UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation

May 7, 2021

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders of Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (“Magnachip” or the “Company” or “we,” “us” or “our”) to be held on June 15, 2021 at 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time. This meeting will be held completely virtually via live interactive webcast on the Internet. You will be able to attend and vote during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MX2021SM. For purposes of attendance at the special meeting, all references in this proxy statement to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the special meeting.

At the special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of March 25, 2021, among Magnachip, South Dearborn Limited, an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability (“Parent”), and Michigan Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”). Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, if the merger is completed, Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnachip (the “Merger”), and Magnachip will continue as the surviving corporation and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.

The Merger Agreement will be adopted only with the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote thereon. If our stockholders adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, and the Merger is completed, each share of our common stock will be converted into the right to receive $29.00 in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes (unless you have properly demanded your statutory rights of appraisal with respect to the Merger), which represents a premium of approximately 54% relative to the unaffected closing price for shares of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on March 2, 2021 (the last full trading day prior to the publication of market rumors regarding a potential acquisition of the Company) and a premium of approximately 75% over the 3-month volume-weighted average price on the New York Stock Exchange prior to that date.

Our board of directors (our “Board”) carefully considered a number of factors in evaluating the terms of the Merger Agreement. Based on such consideration, our Board unanimously approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby. Accordingly, our Board has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and unanimously recommends that you vote:

The enclosed proxy statement provides detailed information about the special meeting, the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other proposals to be voted on at the special meeting. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement. We encourage you to read the proxy statement carefully in its entirety.

Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. The proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger must be approved at the special meeting by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote thereon. Only stockholders who owned shares of our common stock as of the close of business on May 3, 2021, the record date for the special meeting, will be entitled to vote at the special meeting.

To vote your shares, you may submit a proxy via the Internet or by telephone, as specified in the Internet and telephone voting instructions on your proxy card, return your proxy card by mail using the postage prepaid envelope provided, or attend the special meeting virtually and vote during the meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, you must instruct the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote your shares or vote your shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. If you did not receive a 16-digit control number from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot, you should follow the instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in your favor. Even if you plan to attend the special meeting virtually, we urge you to promptly submit a proxy for your shares via the Internet or by telephone or by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card by mail in the postage paid envelope provided.

If you are a record holder of shares of Company Common Stock and fail to submit your proxy via Internet or telephone, return your proxy card by mail or attend the special meeting and vote by virtual ballot during the meeting, then your shares will not be counted for determining whether a quorum is present at the special meeting and your decision not to respond will have the same effect as if you voted “AGAINST” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock and fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee or you fail to vote your shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting, then your shares will not be counted for determining whether a quorum is present at the special meeting and your decision not to respond will have the same effect as if you voted “AGAINST” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger.

Please note, however, that if your shares are held in the name of your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to vote by virtual ballot at the special meeting, you must instruct the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote your shares or vote your shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. If you did not receive a 16-digit control number from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot, you should follow the instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in your favor.

Thank you for your continued support of Magnachip.

Sincerely,

/s/ Young-Joon Kim

Young-Joon Kim

Chief Executive Officer

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state or other securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved of the Merger, passed upon the merits or fairness of the Merger Agreement or the Merger or determined if the accompanying proxy statement is accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The accompanying proxy statement is dated May 7, 2021 and, together with the enclosed form of proxy card, is first being mailed to our stockholders on or about May 10, 2021.

Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Dear Stockholder:

Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation., a Delaware corporation (“Magnachip” or the “Company” or “we,” “us” or “our”), will hold a special meeting of stockholders at 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on June 15, 2021. This meeting will be held completely virtually via live interactive webcast on the Internet. You will be able to attend and vote during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MX2021SM. For purposes of attendance at the special meeting, all references in this proxy statement to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the special meeting. The special meeting is being held to consider and vote upon the following proposals:

Only record holders of Company Common Stock at the close of business on May 3, 2021, the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to receive notice of, and will be entitled to vote at, the special meeting, including any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares of common stock you own.

The votes required to approve each proposal are as follows:

If a quorum is not present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting, it is expected that our board of directors (our “Board”) will recommend adjournment of the special meeting to solicit additional proxies if permitted by the Merger Agreement. If there is not a quorum of stockholders at the special meeting and the vote with respect to the adjournment proposal fails, our Board may set a new record date and meeting date for a special meeting to consider the Merger Agreement, compensation proposal and adjournment proposal, in accordance with the Merger Agreement. In addition, if permitted by the Merger Agreement, the special meeting may be postponed at the discretion of our Board or adjourned by the chairman of the meeting.

If the Merger is completed, our stockholders who (1) submit a written demand for an appraisal of their shares of Company Common Stock to the Company prior to the stockholder vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger, (2) do not submit a proxy or otherwise vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger, (3) hold Company Common Stock upon the making of a demand under clause (1) and continue to hold their shares of Company Common Stock through the effective date of the Merger, (4) do not thereafter withdraw their demand for appraisal of their shares or otherwise lose their appraisal rights, in each case in accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) and (5) otherwise meet the criteria and follow the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL, will have the right to have such shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment of the fair value of such shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, as determined by the court. For a more detailed discussion of your appraisal rights, see the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 78 of this proxy statement and Annex B to this proxy statement.

You are cordially invited to attend the special meeting virtually. Whether or not you expect to attend the special meeting, please submit a proxy via the Internet or by telephone, as specified in the Internet and telephone voting instructions on your proxy card or return your proxy card by mail using the postage prepaid envelope provided as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the special meeting. A return envelope (which is postage prepaid if mailed in the United States) is enclosed for your convenience. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote by virtual ballot during the meeting if you attend the special meeting virtually. Please note, however, that if your shares are held in the name of your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to vote by virtual ballot during the special meeting, you must instruct the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote your shares or vote your shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. If you did not receive a 16-digit control number from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot, you should follow the instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in your favor.

If you sign, date and return your proxy card by mail or submit a proxy via the Internet or by telephone without indicating how you wish to vote on one or more proposals, your proxy will be voted “FOR” such proposal or proposals, such that if you did not indicate how you wish to vote on any proposal, your proxy will be voted “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, “FOR” the compensation proposal and “FOR” the adjournment proposal. If you do attend the special meeting and wish to vote by virtual ballot during the special meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote during the meeting. You may revoke your proxy in the manner described in the enclosed proxy statement at any time before the polls are closed at the special meeting.

Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, “FOR” the compensation proposal and “FOR” the adjournment proposal.

The Merger is described in the accompanying proxy statement, which we urge you to read carefully. A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement. If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your shares of Company Common Stock, please contact our proxy solicitor, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, via telephone toll-free at 1-877-800-5194 (for shareholders) or collect at 1-212-750-5833 (for bankers and brokers).

By Order of the Board of Directors,

/s/ Young-Joon Kim

Young-Joon Kim

Chief Executive Officer

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. The proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement must be approved at the special meeting by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. To vote your shares, you can submit a proxy via the Internet or by telephone, as specified in the Internet and telephone voting instructions on the proxy card, return your proxy card by mail using the postage prepaid return envelope provided, or attend the special meeting virtually and vote by virtual ballot. We urge you to promptly submit a proxy for your shares via the Internet or by telephone or by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card by mail in the postage paid envelope provided.

If you are a record holder of shares of Company Common Stock and fail to submit your proxy via Internet or telephone, return your proxy card by mail or attend the special meeting virtually and vote by virtual ballot then your shares will not be counted for determining whether a quorum is present at the special meeting and your decision not to respond will have the same effect as if you voted “AGAINST” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock and fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee or you fail to vote your shares by virtual ballot, then your shares will not be counted for determining whether a quorum is present at the special meeting and your decision not to respond will have the same effect as if you voted “AGAINST” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger.

If your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, you must instruct the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote your shares or vote your shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. If you did not receive a 16-digit control number from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot, you should follow the instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in your favor.

REFERENCES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

If you have any questions about this proxy statement, the special meeting or the Merger, or need assistance with voting procedures, you should contact:

Innisfree M&A Incorporated

Shareholders (Toll-Free): 1-877-800-5194

Banks and Brokers (Collect): 1-212-750-5833

MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

ii

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND THE MERGER

Except as otherwise specifically noted in this proxy statement, “Magnachip,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and similar words in this proxy statement refer to Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation. In addition, throughout this proxy statement, we refer to South Dearborn Limited as “Parent” and Michigan Merger Sub, Inc. as “Merger Sub.” We refer to our shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as the “Company Common Stock.” For purposes of attendance at the special meeting, all references in this proxy statement to “present in person” or “in person” shall mean virtually present at the special meeting.

The following questions and answers about the special meeting and the Merger (this “Q&A”) are intended to address some commonly asked questions about the special meeting of stockholders and the merger of Merger Sub with and into Magnachip (the “Merger”). This Q&A may not address all questions that may be important to you as a Magnachip stockholder. We urge you to read carefully the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement and the documents we refer to in this proxy statement.

General

You are being solicited to vote in favor of the proposals (1) to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, (2) to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation that may be paid or become payable to our named executive officers named in our proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 29, 2020, as well as our current Chief Financial Officer and current General Manager of Power Solutions (collectively, the “named executive officers”) that is based on or otherwise relates to the Merger (the “compensation proposal”) and (3) to approve the adjournment of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, including to solicit additional proxies if (a) there is not a quorum present in person or represented by proxy or (b) there are insufficient votes to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, in each case, at the time of the then-scheduled special meeting, or to give our stockholders additional time to evaluate new material information or disclosure (the “adjournment proposal”).

1

For a more detailed summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Merger, see the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 85 of this proxy statement.

A copy of the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL is included as Annex B to this proxy statement. Failure to follow any of the statutory procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL may result in the loss of appraisal rights.

2

The Special Meeting

Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote:

See the section captioned “The Special Meeting—Our Board’s Recommendation” beginning on page 31 of this proxy statement. Our stockholders should carefully read this proxy statement in its entirety for more detailed information concerning the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger. In addition, our stockholders are directed to the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement.

3

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on the record date of the special meeting and their duly appointed proxy holders may attend the special meeting virtually and may vote their shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting if they enter the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. Beneficial owners of shares held in “street name” are also invited to attend the special meeting virtually and may vote their shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting if they enter the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. Beneficial owners who did not receive a 16-digit control number from their brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee who wish to attend the special meeting should follow the instructions from their brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in their favor.

4

If you are a record holder of shares of Company Common Stock and you abstain from voting or fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock and you abstain from voting, fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, or fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger.

Advisory approval of the compensation proposal requires a majority of the votes cast by holders of Company Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

Abstentions will not be treated as “votes cast” for purposes of determining the approval of the compensation proposal. If you are a record holder of shares of Company Common Stock and you abstain from voting or fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, it will have no effect on the vote for the compensation proposal, provided that a quorum is present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock and you abstain from voting, fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, or fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, it will have no effect on the vote for the compensation proposal, provided that a quorum is present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting.

5

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the special meeting, who will separately count “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes and abstentions.

If you are a stockholder of record and you abstain from voting or are present at the special meeting in person or by proxy and fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger and a vote “AGAINST” the adjournment proposal but will have no effect on the compensation proposal (provided that a quorum is present). If you are a beneficial owner and you abstain from voting, fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, or fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger but will have no effect on the compensation proposal (provided that a quorum is present). If you are a beneficial owner and you abstain from voting, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the adjournment proposal, but if (1) you attend the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials, fail to give any instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and fail to cast your vote or (2) you do not attend the special meeting in person or by proxy and you fail to give any voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, then, in each case of (1) and (2), it will have no effect on the vote for the adjournment proposal, even if a quorum is not present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting.

6

If you are voting via the Internet or by telephone, your voting instructions must be received by the date and time indicated on the applicable proxy card(s).

Voting via the Internet, by telephone or by mailing in your proxy card will not prevent you from attending the special meeting virtually. You are encouraged to submit a proxy via the Internet, by telephone or by mail even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person, to ensure that your shares of Company Common Stock are represented at the special meeting. If you return a properly signed and dated proxy card but do not mark the box showing how you wish to vote on one or more proposals, your shares will be voted “FOR” such proposal or proposals, such that if you did not mark any boxes on the proxy card, your shares will be voted “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, “FOR” the compensation proposal and “FOR” the adjournment proposal.

If your shares are held through a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares of Company Common Stock held in “street name.” If you are a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock held in “street name,” this proxy statement has been forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, to be the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting. You are also invited to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. If you did not receive a 16-digit control number from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot, you should follow the instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in your favor.

7

In addition, because any shares you may hold in “street name” will be deemed to be held by a different stockholder than any shares you hold of record, shares held in “street name” will not be combined for voting purposes with shares you hold of record. To be sure your shares are voted, you should instruct your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee to vote your shares that you hold in “street name.” Shares held by a corporation or business entity must be voted by an authorized officer of the entity.

Because brokerage firms, banks, trusts or other nominees do not have discretionary voting authority with respect to any of the proposals described in this proxy statement, if a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock held in “street name” does not give voting instructions to the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, then those shares of Company Common Stock will not be present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting. Because all of the proposals being considered at the special meeting are considered “non-routine” matters, it is expected that there will not be any broker non-votes in connection with any of the proposals described in this proxy statement.

If you are a “street name” holder of shares of Company Common Stock, you should contact your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee to obtain instructions as to how to change or revoke your proxy.

8

In addition, if you sell your shares of Company Common Stock prior to the special meeting or prior to the Effective Time, you will not be eligible to exercise your appraisal rights in respect of the Merger. For a more detailed discussion of your appraisal rights and the requirements for properly demanding your appraisal rights, see the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 78 of this proxy statement and Annex B to this proxy statement.

9

A separate copy of these proxy materials will be promptly delivered upon request by contacting (1) our proxy solicitor by telephone at 1-877-800-5194 or (2) our Investor Relations Department by e-mail at investor.relations@magnachip.com.

10

Innisfree M&A Incorporated

Shareholders (Toll-Free): 1-877-800-5194

Banks and Brokers (Collect): 1-212-750-5833

If your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee holds your shares in “street name,” you should also call your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee for additional information.

11

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This proxy statement contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such statements include statements concerning anticipated future events, projections and expectations that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, statements relating to the Merger and expressions of confidence. These forward-looking statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “will be,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe(s),” “intend,” “predict,” “potential,” “future,” “strategy,” “opportunity” and similar words or phrases or the negatives of these words or phrases. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including, but not limited to:

12

We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We do not assume any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement after it is made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

13

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information from this proxy statement related to the Merger and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand the Merger more fully and for a more complete description of the legal terms of the Merger, you should read carefully this entire proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement and the documents we refer to in this proxy statement. See the section captioned “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 129 of this proxy statement. The Merger Agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the Merger Agreement, which is the legal document governing the Merger. Each item in this summary references another section of this proxy statement with more detailed disclosure about that item. Capitalized terms used in this section but not defined in this proxy statement have the meaning ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement.

Parties Involved in the Merger (see page 28)

Magnachip

We are a designer and supplier of analog and mixed-signal semiconductor platform solutions for communications, Internet of Things applications, consumer, industrial and automotive applications. We have a proven record with more than 40 years of operating history, a portfolio of approximately 1,200 registered patents and pending applications and extensive engineering and manufacturing process expertise. On September 1, 2020, we completed the previously announced sale of our Foundry Services Group business and its fabrication facility located in Cheongju known as “Fab 4,” marking a strategic shift in our operational focus to our standard products business. Our standard products business includes our Display Solutions and Power Solutions business lines. Our Display Solutions products provide panel display solutions to major suppliers of large and small rigid and flexible panel displays, and mobile, automotive applications and home appliances. Our Power Solutions products include discrete and integrated circuit solutions for power management in communications, consumer, computing, servers and industrial applications.

Parent

Parent is an investment vehicle established by an affiliate of Wise Road Capital LTD (“Wise Road”). Wise Road is a global private equity firm that invests in leading technology companies. The firm focuses on identifying opportunities in enabling technologies for global urbanization and smart and green life through close cooperation with companies across several main themes, including smart city, intelligent manufacturing and renewable energies. Wise Road strives to build a healthy international ecosystem around these key themes through its investments and its international management team that has a combination of industry and investment expertise. Parent was formed on March 11, 2021, solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Parent has not engaged in any business activities other than in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

Merger Sub

Merger Sub, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, was formed on March 3, 2021, solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Merger Sub has not engaged in any business activities other than in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Upon completion of the Merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnachip, and Merger Sub will cease to exist.

The Special Meeting

(see page 29)

14

Date, Time and Place

A special meeting of our stockholders will be held on June 15, 2021, at 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time, virtually via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MX2021SM. We intend to mail this proxy statement, the proxy card and the notice of special meeting on or about May 10, 2021 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the special meeting.

Record Date; Shares Entitled to Vote

You are entitled to vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of Company Common Stock as of the close of business on May 3, 2021, the record date of the special meeting. You will have one vote at the special meeting for each share of Company Common Stock that you owned as of the close of business on the record date.

Purpose

At the special meeting, we will ask stockholders to vote on proposals to (1) adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, (2) approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation proposal and (3) approve the adjournment proposal.

Quorum

As of the close of business on the record date, there were an aggregate of 46,333,946 outstanding shares of Company Common Stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. The holders of a majority of the voting power of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, present, in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the special meeting.

Required Vote

The votes required to approve each proposal are as follows:

Stock Ownership of Our Directors and Executive Officers

As of the close of business on the record date of the special meeting, our directors and executive officers and their respective affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 498,853 shares of Company Common Stock, representing approximately 1.07% of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock. Although they are not obligated to do so, our directors and executive officers have informed us of their intent to vote

15

all of their shares of Company Common Stock (1) “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, (2) “FOR” the compensation proposal and (3) “FOR” the adjournment proposal.

Voting and Proxies

Any stockholder of record entitled to vote may submit a proxy via the Internet or by telephone, as specified in the Internet and telephone voting instructions on your proxy card, return your proxy card by mail using the postage prepaid envelope provided, or may vote by virtual ballot by attending the special meeting. If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares of Company Common Stock in “street name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you should instruct your bank, broker or other nominee on how you wish to vote your shares of Company Common Stock using the instructions provided by your bank, broker or other nominee. Under applicable stock exchange rules, banks, brokers or other nominees have the discretion to vote on routine matters. The proposals to be considered at the special meeting are non-routine matters, and banks, brokers and other nominees cannot vote on these proposals without your instructions. Therefore, it is important that you cast your vote or instruct your bank, broker or nominee on how you wish to vote your shares.

If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the polls are closed at the special meeting by (1) signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it by mail prior to the special meeting; (2) submitting a new proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone after the date of the earlier submitted proxy; (3) delivering a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary; or (4) attending the special meeting and voting by virtual ballot.

If you hold your shares of Company Common Stock in “street name,” you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee for instructions regarding how to change your vote. Alternatively, you may also vote your shares by virtual ballot at the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials. If you did not receive a 16-digit control number from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot, you should follow the instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in your favor.

The Merger (see page 34)

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, if the Merger is completed, Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnachip, and Magnachip will continue as the surviving corporation and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Surviving Corporation”). As a result of the Merger, we will cease to be a publicly traded company, all outstanding shares of Company Common Stock will be canceled and converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration (except for (1) any shares of Company Common Stock owned by Magnachip or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries or by Parent or any of its subsidiaries immediately before the Effective Time and (2) any shares of Company Common Stock owned by stockholders who are entitled to and who properly exercise appraisal rights under the DGCL).

After the Merger is completed, each holder of shares of Company Common Stock will have the right to receive the Merger Consideration, but will no longer have any rights as a holder of shares of Company Common Stock (except that such holders of shares of Company Common Stock who properly exercise their appraisal rights may have the right to receive a payment for the “fair value” of their shares of Company Common Stock as determined pursuant to an appraisal proceeding as contemplated by Delaware law, as described below under the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 78 of this proxy statement).

Treatment of Magnachip Equity Awards (see page 69)

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, except as described in the following sentence, (1) each outstanding Company Option (as defined under the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and

16

Approval of the Merger—Interests of our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of Magnachip Equity Awards” beginning on page 69 of this proxy statement) whether or not exercisable or vested, will be canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the product of (i) the excess, if any, of the Merger Consideration over the per share exercise or purchase price of the applicable Company Option multiplied by (ii) the aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock underlying such Company Option immediately before the Effective Time; provided that any such Company Option with a per share exercise or purchase price that is equal to or greater than the Merger Consideration will be canceled and terminated for no consideration, (2) each outstanding Company RSU (as defined under the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Interests of our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of Magnachip Equity Awards” beginning on page 69 of this proxy statement) will be vested and all restrictions will lapse in full as of immediately before the Effective Time, and each such vested Company RSU will be canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the Merger Consideration multiplied by the number of shares of Company Common Stock that such Company RSU conveyed the right to receive and (3) each outstanding Company PSU (as defined under the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Interests of our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger—Treatment of Magnachip Equity Awards” beginning on page 69 of this proxy statement) will be vested, and earned or deemed earned, based on performance measures that shall be equal to the maximum amount of such award and all restrictions will lapse in full as of immediately before the Effective Time, and each such vested Company PSU will be canceled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the Merger Consideration multiplied by the number of shares of Company Common Stock that such Company PSU conveyed the right to receive.

Financing of the Merger (see page 77)

Parent has delivered to the Company (1) the Equity Commitment Letter (as defined below in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Financing of the Merger” beginning on page 77 of this proxy statement), pursuant to which the Sponsor (as defined below in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Financing of the Merger” beginning on page 77 of this proxy statement) has committed to provide Parent with the Equity Financing (as defined below in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Financing of the Merger” beginning on page 77 of this proxy statement), and to which Magnachip is a party and pursuant to which Magnachip can cause Parent to draw down the full proceeds of the Equity Financing from the Sponsor and (2) the Investor Commitment Letters (as defined below in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Financing of the Merger” beginning on page 77 of this proxy statement) and to which Magnachip is a third-party beneficiary and, subject to the terms thereof, can cause Sponsor to draw down the full proceeds of the investor commitment under such Investor Commitment Letter.

Parent has represented that the net proceeds from the Equity Financing, in addition to the proceeds of any U.S. dollar debt financing actually received by Parent prior to the closing date, will be sufficient to pay in cash all amounts to be paid by Parent and Merger Sub in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the aggregate Merger Consideration on the terms and conditions contained in the Merger Agreement, plus Parent’s and Merger Sub’s costs and expenses, and there is not, nor will there be, any restriction on the use of such proceeds for such purposes. The obtaining of debt financing is not a condition to the closing of the Merger, however, prior to the Effective Time, Magnachip has agreed to, and will cause each of our subsidiaries to, and will use our reasonable best efforts to cause our respective representatives to, furnish Parent and its Financing Sources (as defined below in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Financing of the Merger” beginning on page 77 of this proxy statement) with all information reasonably necessary for Parent to obtain debt financing on customary terms, and otherwise provide to Parent all cooperation reasonably requested by Parent in connection with obtaining debt

17

financing, including by using reasonable best efforts to take certain actions as set forth in the Merger Agreement, but subject to certain restrictions as set forth in the Merger Agreement.

Standby Letter of Credit (see page 116)

Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Parent has delivered to Magnachip a Standby Letter of Credit (as defined below in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Standby Letter of Credit” beginning on page 116 of this proxy statement) in favor of Magnachip, pursuant to which $103,500,000 may be drawn in cash in Dollars by Magnachip, subject to the terms thereof, in the event that the Parent Termination Fee (as defined below in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees—Termination Fee Payable by Parent” beginning on page 113 of this proxy statement) or other Damages (as defined under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement— Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance” beginning on page 107 of this proxy statement) becomes or may become payable pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement.

Conditions to the Closing of the Merger (see page 108)

Each party’s respective obligation to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction, or to the extent permitted by law, waiver on or before the closing date of various conditions, including the following:

In addition, Parent and Merger Sub are not obligated to effect the Merger unless the following conditions are satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived by Parent on or before the closing date:

18

Further, we are not obligated to effect the Merger unless the following conditions are satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived by us on or before the closing date:

The obligation of Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Merger is not subject to any financing condition.

Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger (see page 88)

Under the Merger Agreement, the Merger cannot be completed until the approval or other authorization of, or filing with or notification to the State Administration for Market Regulation in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”) under the Anti-monopoly Law (China) for antitrust review of business concentrations (the “Required Competition Approval”).

In the Merger Agreement, we and Parent have agreed to, and Parent has agreed to cause each of its affiliates to, use our respective reasonable best efforts to promptly (1) obtain any consents, approvals or other authorizations, and make any filings and notifications, required in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Required Competition Approval, (2) make any other submissions either required or deemed appropriate by both Parent and Magnachip in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under applicable law and (3) take or cause to be taken all other actions necessary, proper or advisable consistent with this efforts provision of the Merger Agreement to cause the expiration of the

19

applicable waiting periods, or receipt of required consents, approvals or authorizations, as applicable, under any law, including the Required Competition Approval, as soon as reasonably practicable.

We and Parent are not currently aware of any material regulatory filings, authorizations, approvals or consents that are required prior to the parties’ consummation of the Merger other than those described in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger.” There can be no assurance, however, if and when any of the approvals required to be obtained for the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement will be obtained or as to the conditions or limitations that such approvals may contain or impose.

Litigation Relating to the Merger (see page 89)

Since April 22, 2021, nine complaints have been filed seeking to enjoin the Merger, or, if the Merger is consummated, rescind the Merger or recover damages, as well as an award of each plaintiff’s fees and litigation expenses. The lawsuits, each filed as an individual action by a purported stockholder of the Company, are captioned as Schulthess v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03587 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Schulthess Complaint”), Pittman v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02306 (E.D.N.Y.), Flanagan v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03743 (S.D.N.Y.), Castelli v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03769 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Castelli Complaint”), Doolittle v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03801 (S.D.N.Y.), Thomas v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03860 (S.D.N.Y.), Finger v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03927 (S.D.N.Y.), Kent v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00657 (D. Del.), and Kennedy v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-02110 (E.D. Pa.). Each complaint alleges that the preliminary proxy statement filed by the Company with the SEC on April 19, 2021 is false and/or misleading and asserts claims for violations of Section 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and SEC Rule 14a-9 against the Company and certain current or former members of our Board. The Schulthess and Castelli Complaints also allege breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current or former members of our Board. The Schulthess Complaint further alleges that the Company aided and abetted purported breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current or former members of our Board. The Company believes the disclosures in the preliminary proxy statement comply fully with all applicable law and that the lawsuits are entirely without merit.

Additional lawsuits arising out of or relating to the Merger Agreement or the Merger may be filed in the future. The results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict and could delay or prevent the completion of the Merger. The existence of litigation relating to the Merger could impact the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the Merger. Moreover, the pending litigation is, and any future additional litigation could be, time consuming and expensive and could divert management’s attention away from its regular business.

Recommendation of Our Board

(see page 53)

Our Board, after considering various factors described under the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Recommendation of Our Board and Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 53 of this proxy statement has unanimously (i) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement and (ii) determined that it is in the best interests of Magnachip and its stockholders that Magnachip enter into the Merger Agreement and consummate the Merger on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement. Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote (1) “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, (2) “FOR” the compensation proposal and (3) “FOR” the adjournment proposal.

20

Fairness Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC

(see page 60)

Our Board retained J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan”) to act as its financial advisor in connection with our Board’s review of strategic alternatives, including the Merger. As part of this engagement, our Board requested that J.P. Morgan evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the Merger Consideration to be paid to the holders of Company Common Stock. At the meeting of our Board on March 25, 2021, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral opinion to our Board that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock in cash to be paid to the Company’s common stockholders in the proposed Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders. J.P. Morgan has confirmed its March 25, 2021 oral opinion by delivering its written opinion to our Board, dated March 25, 2021, that, as of such date, the consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock in cash to be paid to the Company’s common stockholders in the proposed Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders.

The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan dated March 25, 2021, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The summary of the opinion of J.P. Morgan set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. The Company’s stockholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety. J.P. Morgan’s written opinion was addressed to our Board (in its capacity as such) in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the proposed Merger, was directed only to the consideration to be paid to the holders of Company Common Stock in the Merger and did not address any other aspect of the Merger. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the consideration to the holders of any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company or as to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the proposed Merger. The issuance of J.P. Morgan’s opinion was approved by a fairness committee of J.P. Morgan. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of the Company as to how such stockholder should vote with respect to the proposed Merger or any other matter.

Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

(see page 69)

When considering the unanimous recommendation of our Board that you vote to approve the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, you should be aware that our directors and executive officers and certain additional officers of the Company may have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of stockholders generally, including, among other things, the accelerated vesting of equity awards and the preservation of indemnification and insurance protections for service as directors and officers of Magnachip and our subsidiaries. For more information, see the sections captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 68 of this proxy statement and “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Our Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 74 of this proxy statement.

Appraisal Rights

(see page 78)

If the Merger is completed, holders of Company Common Stock who do not vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger and who properly demand appraisal of their shares of Company Common Stock may be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Merger under Section 262 of

21

the DGCL. This means that holders of Company Common Stock may be entitled to have their shares of Company Common Stock appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash of the “fair value” of their shares of Company Common Stock, exclusive of any elements of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger, together with interest to be paid on the amount determined to be fair value, if any, as determined by the court. Due to the complexity of the appraisal process, holders of Company Common Stock who wish to seek appraisal of their shares of Company Common Stock are encouraged to seek the advice of legal counsel with respect to the exercise of appraisal rights.

Holders of Company Common Stock considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares of Company Common Stock as determined pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL could be more than, the same as or less than the Merger Consideration (see pages 83 to 85)

To exercise your appraisal rights, you must (1) submit a written demand for an appraisal of your shares of Company Common Stock to the Company prior to the stockholder vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger; (2) not submit a proxy or otherwise vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger; (3) hold Company Common Stock upon the making of a demand under clause (1) and continue to hold your shares of Company Common Stock through the effective date of the Merger; (4) not thereafter withdraw your demand for appraisal of your shares or otherwise lose your appraisal rights, in each case in accordance with the DGCL; and (5) otherwise meet the criteria and follow the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL. Your failure to follow exactly the procedures specified under the DGCL may result in the loss of your appraisal rights. The DGCL requirements for exercising appraisal rights are described in further detail in this proxy statement, and the relevant section of the DGCL regarding appraisal rights is reproduced in Annex B to this proxy statement. Under Delaware law, only a stockholder of record can submit the demand for appraisal referred to in clause (1) above. A person having a beneficial interest in shares of Company Common Stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow the steps required by Section 262 of the DGCL and in a timely manner to exercise appraisal rights. If you hold your shares of Company Common Stock through a bank, broker or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your bank, broker or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal on your behalf by your bank, broker or other nominee.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

(see page 85)

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the receipt of cash by a U.S. Holder in exchange for such U.S. Holder’s shares of Company Common Stock in the Merger generally will result in the recognition of gain or loss in an amount measured by the difference, if any, between the amount of cash that such U.S. Holder receives in the Merger and such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares of Company Common Stock surrendered in the Merger.

A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to the exchange of Company Common Stock for cash in the Merger unless such Non-U.S. Holder has certain connections to the United States.

For more information, see the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” beginning on page 85 of this proxy statement. Stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the Merger in light of their particular circumstances and any consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or non-U.S. taxing jurisdiction.

Delisting and Deregistration of Company Common Stock

(see page 34)

22

If the Merger is completed, the Company Common Stock will be delisted from the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act.

Alternative Acquisition Proposals

(see page 101)

From the date of the Merger Agreement until the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, Magnachip will not, and will cause each of our subsidiaries and certain representatives of our financial advisors (set forth in Magnachip’s confidential disclosure letter to the Merger Agreement) not to, and Magnachip will use our reasonable best efforts to cause our and our subsidiaries’ other representatives not to:

Notwithstanding these restrictions, under certain circumstances, prior to the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by our stockholders, we may provide access and non-public information to (provided that any material non-public information to be provided has previously been provided to Parent or is provided to Parent immediately thereafter), and participate in discussions and negotiations with, any third party from whom we receive a bona fide, unsolicited, written Takeover Proposal that is not withdrawn and did not result directly or indirectly from a material breach of any of the provisions of the Merger Agreement if (1) our Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal and financial advisors that such Takeover Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal (as defined below in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Our Board’s Recommendation; Company Board Recommendation Change” beginning on page 102 of this proxy statement), (2) our Board determines in good faith, after having taken into account the advice of our outside legal counsel, that the failure to take the foregoing actions would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations to our stockholders under applicable law and (3) at least 24 hours prior to taking any of the foregoing actions, Magnachip (A) gives Parent written notice of the identity of the person making such Takeover Proposal (to the extent not restricted by the terms of any confidentiality agreement in existence on the date of the Merger Agreement) and of our intention to furnish non-public information to, or enter into discussions or negotiations with, such person, and (B) receives from such person, and delivers to Parent a copy of, an acceptable confidentiality agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Merger Agreement, no access or non-public information may be provided to, and discussions or negotiations may not be entered into (and no Takeover Proposal will be (or will be deemed to be) a Superior Proposal for any purpose under the Merger Agreement) unless and until (x) the person (or group of persons) making the applicable Takeover Proposal has permitted Magnachip (without liability) to provide Parent with the identity of such person (or group of persons), the material terms and conditions of such Takeover Proposal (and any modification or proposed modification thereto) and any documentation relating thereto and (y) Magnachip has provided such information and documentation to Parent.

23

Change in Our Board’s Recommendation

(see page 102)

Our Board has unanimously recommended that Magnachip stockholders vote “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger. Generally, our Board will not change its recommendation in favor of the Merger.

However, the Merger Agreement permits our Board, at any time before the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by our stockholders, in response to an unsolicited, bona fide, written Superior Proposal received by our Board after the date of the Merger Agreement that did not result directly or indirectly from a material breach of any of the provisions of the Merger Agreement, to (x) effect a Company Board Recommendation Change (as defined below in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Our Board’s Recommendation; Company Board Recommendation Change” beginning on page 102 of this proxy statement) with respect to such Superior Proposal or (y) authorize Magnachip to terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement, in each case, but only if:

In addition, our Board may also effect a Company Board Recommendation Change at any time before the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by our stockholders, in response to an Intervening

24

Event (as defined below in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Our Board’s Recommendation; Company Board Recommendation Change” beginning on page 102 of this proxy statement) if our Board determines in good faith, following consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, that the applicable change, event, effect, occurrence, development, fact or circumstance constitutes an Intervening Event and that its failure to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law, subject to a four business day negotiation period with Parent.

Termination of the Merger Agreement

(see page 110)

The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time before the Effective Time:

25

26

Termination Fees (see page 113)

If the Merger Agreement is terminated under specified circumstances, we will be required to pay Parent a Company Termination Fee equal to $42,100,000 (as may be increased to include interest, costs and expenses as described in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees —Interest, Costs and Expenses” beginning on page 115 of this proxy statement).

If the Merger Agreement is terminated under other specified circumstances, Parent will be required to pay us the Parent Termination Fee equal to $105,300,000 (as may be reduced pursuant to the proviso at the end of the first paragraph of the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees—Termination Fee Payable by Parent” beginning on page 113 of this proxy statement or increased to include interest, costs and expenses as described in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees —Interest, Costs and Expenses” beginning on page 115 of this proxy statement).

For more information on these termination fees, see the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees” beginning on page 113 of this proxy statement.

Effect on Magnachip if the Merger is Not Completed

(see page 89)

If the Merger Agreement is not adopted and the Merger is not approved by stockholders or if the Merger is not completed for any other reason, stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares of Company Common Stock. Instead, we will remain a stand-alone public company, shares of Company Common Stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE and registered under the Exchange Act, and we will continue to file periodic reports with the SEC. Under specified circumstances, upon the termination of the Merger Agreement, we will be required to pay Parent a termination fee. For more details, see the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees” beginning on page 113 of this proxy statement.

In addition, if the Merger is not completed, we expect that management will operate the business in a manner similar to that in which it is being operated today and that stockholders will continue to be subject to the same risks and opportunities to which they are currently subject, including risks related to the highly competitive industry in which we operate and risks related to adverse economic conditions.

27

PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE MERGER

Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation

c/o MagnaChip Semiconductor S.A.

1, Allée Scheffer, L-2520

Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

We are a designer and supplier of analog and mixed-signal semiconductor platform solutions for communications, Internet of Things applications, consumer, industrial and automotive applications. We have a proven record with more than 40 years of operating history, a portfolio of approximately 1,200 registered patents and pending applications and extensive engineering and manufacturing process expertise. On September 1, 2020, we completed the previously announced sale of our Foundry Services Group business and its fabrication facility located in Cheongju known as “Fab 4,” marking a strategic shift in our operational focus to our standard products business. Our standard products business includes our Display Solutions and Power Solutions business lines. Our Display Solutions products provide panel display solutions to major suppliers of large and small rigid and flexible panel displays, and mobile, automotive applications and home appliances. Our Power Solutions products include discrete and integrated circuit solutions for power management in communications, consumer, computing, servers and industrial applications.

South Dearborn Limited

c/o Vistra (Cayman) Limited

P.O. Box 31119 Grand Pavilion, Hibiscus Way

802 West Bay Road

Grand Cayman, KY1 - 1205

Cayman Islands

South Dearborn Limited, an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability (“Parent”) is an investment vehicle established by an affiliate of Wise Road Capital LTD (“Wise Road”). Wise Road is a global private equity firm that invests in leading technology companies. The firm focuses on identifying opportunities in enabling technologies for global urbanization and smart and green life through close cooperation with companies across several main themes, including smart city, intelligent manufacturing and renewable energies. Wise Road strives to build a healthy international ecosystem around these key themes through its investments and its international management team that has a combination of industry and investment expertise. Parent was formed on March 11, 2021, solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Parent has not engaged in any business activities other than in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

Michigan Merger Sub, Inc.

c/o The Corporation Trust Company

Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street

Wilmington, County of New Castle

Delaware 19801

Michigan Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, was formed on March 3, 2021, solely for the purpose of engaging in the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Merger Sub has not engaged in any business activities other than in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Upon completion of the Merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnachip, and Merger Sub will cease to exist.

28

THE SPECIAL MEETING

The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of our Board for use at the special meeting of stockholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Date, Time and Place

We will hold the special meeting on June 15, 2021 at 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time, virtually via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MX2021SM. We intend to mail this proxy statement, the proxy card and the notice of special meeting on or about May 10, 2021 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the special meeting.

Purpose of the Special Meeting

At the special meeting of our stockholders, we will ask the holders of Company Common Stock to: (1) adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger; (2) approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation proposal; and (3) approve the adjournment proposal.

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, if the Merger is completed, Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnachip, and Magnachip will continue as the Surviving Corporation.

Record Date; Shares Entitled to Vote; Quorum

Only holders of record of Company Common Stock as of the close of business on May 3, 2021, the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting.

As of the close of business on the record date, there were approximately 46,333,946 shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding, held collectively by approximately 70 stockholders of record. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote per share of Company Common Stock at the special meeting on each of the proposals.

The presence at the special meeting in person or represented by proxy of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock entitled to vote at the special meeting shall constitute a quorum. Votes cast at the special meeting in person or by proxy will be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the special meeting. If shares are present at the special meeting in person or represented by proxy, but are not voted, those shares will count toward determining whether or not a quorum is present for the conduct of business at the special meeting, as will all shares voted “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on a proposal.

In the event that a quorum is not present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting, it is expected that our Board will recommend adjournment of the special meeting to solicit additional proxies if permitted by the Merger Agreement. If there is not a quorum of stockholders at the special meeting and the vote with respect to the adjournment proposal fails, our Board, if permitted by the Merger Agreement, may set a new record date and meeting date for a special meeting to consider the Merger Agreement, compensation proposal and adjournment proposal. In addition, if permitted by the Merger Agreement, the special meeting may be postponed at the discretion of our Board or adjourned by the chairman of the meeting.

Vote Required

The votes required to approve each proposal are as follows:

29

Voting by Our Directors and Executive Officers

As of the close of business on the record date of the special meeting, our directors and executive officers and their respective affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 498,853 shares of Company Common Stock, representing approximately 1.07% of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock. Although they are not obligated to do so, our directors and executive officers have informed us of their intent to vote all of their shares of Company Common Stock:

Certain members of our management and our Board have interests in the Merger that are in addition to those of stockholders generally and may be different from, or in conflict with, your interests as our stockholder. See the sections captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 68 of this proxy statement and “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Our Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 74 of this proxy statement for more information.

As of the close of business on the record date of the special meeting, our directors and executive officers and their respective affiliates beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, 498,853 shares of Company Common Stock at the special meeting, or approximately 1.07% of the shares of Company Common Stock outstanding on such date. Although they are not obligated to do so, our directors and executive officers have informed us that they intend to vote all of their shares of Company Common Stock “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger.

Voting of Proxies

If your shares are registered in your name, you may cause your shares to be voted at the special meeting by returning a signed proxy card by mail or vote by virtual ballot at the meeting. Additionally, you may submit a proxy authorizing the voting of your shares via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions printed on the proxy card. You must have the enclosed proxy card available, and follow the instructions on the proxy card, in order to submit a proxy via the Internet or by telephone.

Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. All shares represented by properly executed proxies received in time for the special meeting will be voted at the special meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions for one or more proposals will be voted “FOR” such proposal or proposals, such that if you did not provide voting instructions for any proposal, your shares will be voted “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, “FOR” the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation proposal and “FOR” the approval of the adjournment proposal.

If your shares are held in “street name” through a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, you may provide voting instructions by completing and returning the voting form provided by your brokerage firm, bank,

30

trust or other nominee or via the Internet or by telephone through your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, if such a service is provided. To provide voting instructions via the Internet or telephone, you should follow the instructions on the voting instruction form provided by your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee. Alternatively, if you plan to attend the special meeting and vote your shares during the special meeting, you can do so by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials and vote your shares by virtual ballot. If you did not receive a 16-digit control number from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to attend the special meeting and vote your shares by virtual ballot, you should follow the instructions from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy executed in your favor. If you do not return your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee’s voting form, provide voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone through your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee or attend the special meeting virtually and vote by virtual ballot, it will have the same effect as if you voted “AGAINST” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger but will have no effect on the compensation proposal (provided a quorum is present) or the adjournment proposal (whether or not a quorum is present).

Revocability of Proxies

Any proxy you give pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by you at any time before the polls are closed at the special meeting. Proxies may be revoked as follows:

If you have sent a proxy directly to us, you may revoke it:

If you have instructed your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee to vote your shares, you may revoke your proxy only by following the directions received from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee to change those instructions.

Your attendance at the special meeting does not alone automatically revoke your proxy. If you have instructed your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote your shares, the above-described options for revoking your proxy do not apply. Instead, you must follow the directions provided by your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee to change your vote.

Our Board’s Recommendations

Our Board has unanimously (i) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement and (ii) determined that it is in the best interests of Magnachip and its stockholders that Magnachip enter into the Merger Agreement and consummate the Merger on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement. Our Board unanimously recommends that our stockholders (1) vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger; (2) vote “FOR” the compensation proposal; and (3) vote “FOR” the adjournment proposal. See the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Recommendation of Our Board and

31

Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 53 of this proxy statement. Our stockholders should carefully read this proxy statement in its entirety for more detailed information concerning the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger. In addition, our stockholders are directed to the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement.

Effect of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes

The Merger Agreement must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock entitled to vote. If you are a stockholder of record and you abstain from voting or fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger. If you are a beneficial owner and you abstain from voting, fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, or fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger.

The compensation proposal must be approved by a majority of votes cast by holders of Company Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote thereon. The adjournment proposal must be approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of Company Common Stock present or represented at the special meeting and entitled to vote, although less than a quorum.

If you are a stockholder of record and you abstain from voting or are present at the special meeting in person or by proxy and fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, it will have no effect on the vote for the compensation proposal (provided that a quorum is present). If you are a beneficial owner and you abstain from voting, fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, or fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, it will have no effect on the vote for the compensation proposal (provided that a quorum is present). If you are a stockholder of record and you abstain from voting or are present at the special meeting in person or by proxy and fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the adjournment proposal. If you are a beneficial owner and you abstain from voting, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the adjournment proposal, but if (1) you attend the special meeting by entering the 16-digit control number on the voting instructions that accompany these proxy materials, fail to give any instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and fail to cast your vote or (2) you do not attend the special meeting in person or by proxy and you fail to give any voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, then, in each case of (1) and (2), it will have no effect on the vote for the adjournment proposal, even if a quorum is not present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and do not provide your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee with specific voting instructions, the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee may generally vote on “routine” matters, but cannot vote on “non-routine” matters. The proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, the compensation proposal and the adjournment proposal are considered “non-routine” matters. If the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, it will inform the inspector of elections that it does not have authority to vote on this matter with respect to your shares. This is referred to as a “broker non-vote.”

Because brokerage firms, banks, trusts or other nominees do not have discretionary voting authority with respect to any of the proposals described in this proxy statement, if a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock held in “street name” does not give voting instructions to the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, then those shares of Company Common Stock will not be present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting. Because all of the proposals being considered at the special meeting are considered “non-routine” matters, it is expected that there will not be any broker non-votes in connection with any of the proposals described in this proxy statement.

32

Solicitation of Proxies

This proxy solicitation is being made by Magnachip on behalf of our Board and will be paid for by us. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies by personal interview, mail, e-mail, telephone, facsimile or other means of communication. These persons will not be paid additional remuneration for their efforts. We have also retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated, a proxy solicitation firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $30,000 plus the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by it on our behalf. In addition, we may reimburse banks, brokers and other nominees representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding soliciting materials to such beneficial owners. You should not send your certificates of Company Common Stock with your proxy card. A letter of transmittal with instructions for the surrender of such stock certificates, if any, will be mailed to our stockholders as soon as practicable after completion of the Merger.

Stockholder List

A list of our stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available for examination online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MX2021SM by any of our stockholders during the special meeting. For 10 days prior to the special meeting, this stockholder list will be available for inspection by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the special meeting during ordinary business hours at our corporate offices located at c/o MagnaChip Semiconductor S.A., 1, Allée Scheffer, L-2520, Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Stockholders may contact our Investor Relations Department at investor.relations@magnachip.com and arrangements will be made to review the records in person during the 10 days prior to the special meeting.

Anticipated Date of Completion of the Merger

We are working toward completing the Merger as quickly as possible and expect the Merger to be completed during the second half of 2021. However, the Merger continues to be subject to various closing conditions, including our stockholder approval and, therefore, we cannot assure you that all conditions to the Merger will be satisfied or, if satisfied, the date by which they will be satisfied.

Householding of Special Meeting Materials

The SEC’s proxy rules permit companies and intermediaries, such as brokers and banks, to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing an address by delivering a single proxy statement to those stockholders, unless contrary instructions have been received. This procedure reduces the amount of duplicate information that stockholders receive and lowers printing and mailing costs for companies. Certain brokerage firms, banks, trusts or other nominees may have instituted householding for beneficial owners of Company Common Stock held through such firms. If your family has multiple accounts holding Company Common Stock, you may have already received a householding notification from your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee. You may decide at any time to revoke your decision to household, and thereby receive multiple copies of proxy materials. If you wish to opt out of this procedure and receive a separate set of proxy materials in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one, you should contact your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee or our Investor Relations Department at the address and telephone number below. A separate copy of these proxy materials will be promptly delivered upon request by contacting (1) our proxy solicitor by telephone at 1-877-800-5194 or (2) our Investor Relations Department by e-mail at investor.relations@magnachip.com.

Other Matters

At this time, we know of no other matters to be voted on at the special meeting. If any other matters properly come before the special meeting, your shares of Company Common Stock will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the appointed proxy holders.

33

PROPOSAL 1: ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE MERGER

The following discussion describes material aspects of the Merger. While we believe that the following description covers the material terms of the Merger, the description may not contain all of the information that may be important to you. The discussion of the Merger in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. We encourage you to read carefully this entire proxy statement, including the Merger Agreement, for a more complete understanding of the Merger.

General

If the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger receives the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock entitled to vote thereon, and, upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, the Merger is completed, Merger Sub will merge with and into Magnachip, and Magnachip will continue as the Surviving Corporation and as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent.

As a result of the Merger, Magnachip will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent, and shares of Company Common Stock will no longer be publicly traded and will be delisted from the NYSE. In addition, shares of Company Common Stock will be deregistered under the Exchange Act, and we will no longer file periodic reports with the SEC. If the Merger is completed, each holder of shares of Company Common Stock immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will not own any shares of common stock of the Surviving Corporation following the Merger.

The Effective Time will occur upon the filing of a Certificate of Merger (the “Certificate of Merger”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (or at such later time as Magnachip and Parent may agree and specify in the Certificate of Merger).

As a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Company Common Stock (other than (1) any shares of Company Common Stock owned by Magnachip or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries or by Parent or any of its subsidiaries immediately before the Effective Time and (2) any shares of Company Common Stock for which the holder thereof (a) has not voted in favor of the Merger or consented to it in writing and (b) has properly and validly exercised their statutory rights of appraisal in respect of such shares of Company Common Stock in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL) will be canceled and converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration. In addition, the treatment of our outstanding equity awards is described in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Merger Consideration—Company Equity Awards” beginning on page 93 of this proxy statement.

After the Merger is completed, holders of Company Common Stock will have the right to receive the Merger Consideration, but will no longer have any rights as a stockholder (except that stockholders who properly exercise their appraisal rights may have the right to receive a payment for the “fair value” of their shares of Company Common Stock as determined pursuant to an appraisal proceeding before the Delaware Court of Chancery as contemplated by Delaware law, as described below under the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 78 of this proxy statement).

34

Background of the Merger

The following chronology summarizes the key meetings and events that led to the signing of the Merger Agreement. The following chronology does not purport to catalogue every conversation among our Board, the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee (as defined below), members of Company management or the representatives of the Company and other parties. All dates are in New York City time unless otherwise stated.

In the ordinary course of its business, our Board, with the assistance of the Company’s senior management team and the Company’s advisors, regularly reviews the near-term and long-term strategy, performance, positioning and operating prospects of the Company with a view toward enhancing stockholder value. These reviews have included, from time to time, discussions as to whether the continued execution of the Company’s strategy as a stand-alone company, a possible separate sale of one of our business lines to a third party, a possible business combination or joint venture with a third party or a possible sale of the Company to a third party offered the best opportunity to enhance stockholder value, as well as a review of the potential benefits and risks associated with each such course of action. As part of this process, the Company engaged Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (including its representatives, “Paul, Weiss”) as legal counsel to assist the Company in evaluating certain potential strategic alternatives available to the Company.

On February 14, 2019, the Company announced that our Board had undertaken a strategic evaluation of the Foundry Services Group business and the fabrication facility located in Cheongju (“Fab 4”), and engaged J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (including its representatives, “J.P. Morgan”) as the Company’s financial advisor to assist in such strategic evaluation (“Foundry Sale Process”).

On July 31, 2019, a financial sponsor we refer to as Party A (including its representatives) contacted Mr. Jonathan Kim, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, noting that Party A planned to be in Seoul, Korea and would like to meet with Mr. YJ Kim, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

On August 7, 2019, with authorization from our Board, Mr. YJ Kim and Mr. J. Kim, met the Co-Head of M&A and Director of M&A of Party A, in Seoul, Korea. Party A presented an overview of Party A’s history and strategy, and noted that they had been following the Company for a long time, and were interested in buying the whole Company, including both business lines of the Company’s Standard Products Group (Display Solutions and Power Solutions), but excluding the Foundry Services Group if it was sold in the Foundry Sale Process. No valuation was presented or offered at this meeting. Party A noted that they respected our Board’s Foundry Sale Process, and that they were willing to wait until after the Foundry Sale Process was concluded to have further discussions regarding the acquisition of the Company’s other business lines. Mr. YJ Kim noted that our Board and senior management were committed to the Foundry Sale Process, and that Party A should reach out to J.P. Morgan and our Board in connection with the Foundry Sale Process to discuss any strategy-related topics regarding the Foundry Services Group.

On December 7, 2019, Mr. YJ Kim was introduced to the Co-Managing Partners of Party A while Mr. YJ Kim was in China on a business trip.

On January 6, 2020, a consortium of two financial sponsors we refer to jointly as Party B (including their representatives), delivered an unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest, addressed to Mr. YJ Kim, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company’s Power Solutions business by Party B at a valuation of $175-223 million. Following receipt of the January 6, 2020 letter, our Board reviewed the letter at a meeting of our Board and determined that it was not prudent for the Company to pursue a sale of the Power Solutions business at that time.

On March 30, 2020, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for the sale of its Foundry Services Group and the fabrication facility located in Cheongju known as “Fab 4” (the “Foundry Sale”).

35

On June 24, 2020, Party B delivered another unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest, again for the acquisition of the Company’s Power Solutions business, with a revised valuation of $183-265 million. Following receipt of the June 24, 2020 letter, our Board reviewed the letter at a regularly scheduled meeting and determined that it was not prudent for the Company to pursue a sale of the Power Solutions business at that time.

On June 26, 2020 (Seoul time), Party A delivered an unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest (the “Party A First Indication of Interest”), addressed to our Board, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company by Party A, including a request to conduct due diligence on the Company. The Party A First Indication of Interest indicated a potential value of $16.50 per share of Company Common Stock on a fully diluted basis, subject to a number of conditions, including the consummation of the Foundry Sale, and that the transaction would be fully funded with equity financing.

At a meeting of our Board held on June 29, 2020, our Board discussed the Party A First Indication of Interest and determined, after discussion with its advisors, that Party A’s offer was not at a level sufficient to warrant further engagement by the Company and that the Company should focus on the consummation of the Foundry Sale. On July 1, 2020, the Company sent a letter to Party A in response to the First Indication of Interest, indicating that following an evaluation of the Party A First Indication of Interest, our Board had determined that the Company is not for sale.

On July 13, 2020, a financial sponsor we refer to as Party C (including its representatives), delivered an unsolicited, non-binding, memo, addressed to Mr. YJ Kim, regarding a proposal to engage in an equal interest joint venture with the Company relating to the Company’s Power Solutions business with the ultimate goal to list the joint venture publicly on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. On July 20, 2020, Party C delivered an addendum to Party C’s non-binding proposal dated July 13, 2020 with proposed purchase price terms. This memo was reviewed with our Board and it was determined that it would not be prudent to engage further with Party C regarding its proposal.

On September 14, 2020 (Seoul time), a potential strategic buyer, who we refer to as Party D (including its representatives), delivered an unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest, addressed to Mr. YJ Kim, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company by Party D (together with Party A, Party B, Party C and Party D, the “Prior Bidders”). The letter indicated a potential value of $16.00-18.00 per share of Company Common Stock. The letter indicated that an additional adjustment of up to 10% would be considered after Party D’s review of the Company’s 2020 financial performance. Party D also noted there may be a further adjustment based on the Company’s cash balance on the closing date of a potential transaction. Following receipt of the letter, our Board reviewed the indication of interest and it was agreed that Mr. YJ Kim and Paul, Weiss would engage with Party D further to gauge Party D’s level of seriousness in a potential transaction with the Company.

On September 16, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board discussed the inbound indications of interest from the Prior Bidders. Paul, Weiss reviewed with our Board its fiduciary duties in connection with the indications of interest and the legal and practical issues to be considered by our Board. Paul, Weiss also discussed various process considerations to facilitate our Board’s implementation of value-maximizing checks before entering into any transactions with one of the Prior Bidders. Our Board instructed Paul, Weiss to review the profiles of all of the Prior Bidders and to continue engaging with them.

On September 17, 2020, at the direction of our Board, Paul, Weiss had a conversation with Party B, during which Party B indicated that they might consider other alternative transactions.

On September 18, 2020, at the direction of our Board, Paul, Weiss had a conversation with Party D. Paul, Weiss noted that the Company is not for sale.

On September 18, 2020, at the direction of our Board, Paul, Weiss had a conversation with Party C. Paul, Weiss noted that the Company is not for sale and that our Board is not interested in Party C’s proposal. Party C noted it was trying to put together a consortium to acquire the Company.

36

On September 24, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board discussed the inbound indications of interest from the Prior Bidders. Paul, Weiss described each Prior Bidder, summarized the latest communications with each Prior Bidder, and discussed with our Board the advantages and disadvantages associated with each indication of interest. Based on the discussion, our Board determined that Party A and Party D had the most promising indications of interest. Our Board determined to continue discussions with Party A and Party D about their respective indications of interest. Paul, Weiss reviewed with our Board its fiduciary duties in connection with the indications of interest. Our Board and Paul, Weiss also discussed formally engaging J.P. Morgan as a financial advisor to assist the Company and our Board in evaluating the indications of interest and any future proposals the Company might receive, and J.P. Morgan was subsequently formally engaged.

On September 25, 2020 (Seoul time), at the direction of our Board, Paul, Weiss met with Party D and its legal counsel in Beijing, China. Paul, Weiss reiterated that the Company is not for sale and pointed out issues with Party D’s offer, particularly regarding Party D’s proposed source of funds. Party D noted it would discuss this feedback internally and update Paul, Weiss thereafter.

On September 30, 2020 (Seoul time), Mr. YJ Kim and Mr. Theodore S. Kim, the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, had a conversation with Party D. Mr. YJ Kim reiterated that the Company is not for sale, and as such, there was no formal process set up by our Board to engage with Party D. Mr. YJ Kim and Mr. T. Kim further noted that Party D’s source of funding was unclear. Party D noted that they would send a further updated indication of interest, in which they would clarify their proposed source of funds.

The Director of M&A of Party A travelled to Seoul, Korea and met with the Company’s senior management on October 6, 2020 (Seoul time).

On October 11, 2020, Party D called Mr. Gary Tanner, a member of our Board, to preview the terms of their forthcoming offer. On October 12, 2020 (Seoul time), Party D delivered a second unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest, addressed to Mr. YJ Kim, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company by Party D. In the indication of interest, Party D reiterated a potential value of $16.00-18.00 per share of Company Common Stock. The letter indicated an adjustment of up to 10%, subject to confirmation through review by Party D of the 2020 financial performance of the Company. Unlike Party D’s first indication of interest, the potential adjustment of up to 10% included the Company’s cash balance on the closing date of a potential transaction. The letter indicated that it was subject to due diligence and that the transaction may require further internal approvals and certain regulatory and governmental approvals. Party D noted that the offer in the indication of interest would remain open until December 12, 2020. Following receipt of the letter, Mr. YJ Kim, Mr. T. Kim and Paul, Weiss reviewed the indication of interest and agreed to review it with our Board at its next scheduled meeting.

On October 14, 2020 (Seoul time), Party A delivered a second unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest (the “Party A Second Indication of Interest”), addressed to our Board, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company by Party A, including a request for a period of exclusivity to conduct due diligence on the Company. The Party A Second Indication of Interest indicated an increased purchase price of $21.50 per share of Company Common Stock, subject to confirmation through due diligence. The Party A Second Indication of Interest reiterated Party A’s plan of all equity financing and noted they could, if necessary, elect to fund the entire purchase price from U.S. Dollar-denominated funds and offshore (i.e., outside of the PRC) entities. Mr. YJ Kim, Mr. T. Kim and Paul, Weiss reviewed the Second Indication of Interest and agreed to review it with our Board at its next scheduled meeting.

On October 14, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board discussed the updated inbound indications of interest from Party A and Party D. Our Board also broadly discussed the indications of interest received to date, particularly from Party B and Party C. J.P. Morgan provided its preliminary analysis with respect to Party A’s offer price of $21.50 per share of Company Common Stock and outlined the process to evaluate it further. Our

37

Board instructed J.P. Morgan to review Party A’s offer price in more detail, and to continue to engage with Party A. Our Board also instructed J.P. Morgan to take steps to establish a virtual data room.

On October 27, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the market valuation of the Company based on various metrics. Our Board determined that the Company should sign a confidentiality agreement with Party A, and that J.P. Morgan should further engage with Party A to continue discussion on fundamental terms of a potential transaction.

On October 29, 2020, J.P. Morgan spoke with the Director of M&A at Party A about the Company’s most recent earnings report.

On October 30, 2020, J.P. Morgan sent Party A a draft confidentiality agreement. From October 31-November 8, 2020, Paul, Weiss and Party A’s legal counsel negotiated the confidentiality agreement.

On November 3, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed developments with respect to J.P. Morgan’s engagement with a potential strategic buyer that requested an introduction to the Company. Our Board authorized Mr. YJ Kim to meet with this third party and the Company to enter into a confidentiality agreement with Party A.

On November 9, 2020, the Company and Party A entered into a confidentiality agreement, which included a customary standstill with a fall-away provision in the event that the Company enters into a definitive agreement with another party with respect to all or a controlling portion of the Company’s equity securities or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

On November 12, 2020 (Seoul time), Mr. YJ Kim gave a presentation with an overview of the Company’s growth plans and financial outlook to representatives of Party A. J.P. Morgan and Mr. T. Kim also participated in this meeting with Party A.

On November 16, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed developments with respect to J.P. Morgan’s engagement with Party A. Paul, Weiss discussed the fundamental terms of a potential transaction with Party A set forth in a term sheet drafted by Paul, Weiss (the “Party A Term Sheet”).

On November 19, 2020 (Seoul time), Party D sent an e-mail to Mr. YJ Kim requesting feedback with respect to its updated indication of interest that was delivered on October 12, 2020. Party D also noted that regulatory approvals and filings in the PRC relating to overseas direct investment (“ODI Approval”) would not be an issue for Party D to close a potential transaction.

On November 20, 2020, Party A sent an e-mail to J.P. Morgan reaffirming its interest in acquiring the Company and reiterated the terms set forth in the Party A Second Indication of Interest (the “Party A November 20 Offer”). In the Party A November 20 Offer, Party A noted it was prepared to increase the offer price to $22.00 per share of Company Common Stock. Party A requested that our Board respond to Party A regarding this revised offer before the close of business on November 24, 2020. Party A noted it was committed to completing its due diligence of the Company and finalizing the definitive agreements expeditiously.

On November 20, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the Party A November 20 Offer and updates in their engagement with Party A. J.P. Morgan reviewed with our Board the latest valuation data. Paul, Weiss discussed the fundamental terms contained in the Party A Term Sheet. Our Board determined that it would meet on November 23, 2020 to finalize its response to the Party A November 20 Offer.

On November 22, 2020, the Head of M&A at Party A called Paul, Weiss and provided additional detail related to their revised offer price of $22.00 per share of Company Common Stock in the Party A November 20

38

Offer. He noted that Party A thought that the Company was being too aggressive in trying to negotiate a valuation per share of Company Common Stock of more than $25.00. He further noted that Party A’s investment committee had not been inclined to increase their offer in the Party A November 20 Offer.

On November 23, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest draft of the Party A Term Sheet. Our Board discussed a proposed response to the Party A November 20 Offer and directed J.P. Morgan to communicate a counter-offer of $22.50 per share of Company Common Stock to Party A, which was the price at which our Board was willing to engage further with Party A.

On November 24, 2020, J.P. Morgan relayed to Party A that our Board was willing to engage further at a price of $22.50 per share of Company Common Stock and requested that Party A make a deposit of $120 million in U.S. dollar funds (the “Deposit”) concurrently with the signing of definitive documents. Also on November 24, 2020, Paul, Weiss delivered the Party A Term Sheet to Party A, which contained, among other things, a 30-day go-shop period during which the Company can solicit and negotiate other proposals or offers, a limited set of closing conditions, a Company termination fee of 3% of equity transaction value (or 1.5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated for a proposal made during the go-shop period), and forfeiture of the Deposit to the Company if the merger agreement is terminated for any reason (including if there is a governmental order enjoining the transaction or the parties fail to obtain applicable antitrust approvals) other than termination by the Company for a superior proposal or termination by Party A due to a recommendation change by our Board or the Company’s material uncured breach. The Party A Term Sheet also required Party A to provide an equity commitment letter for the full amount of the financing to consummate the transaction (of which the Company would be a third party beneficiary) and a guaranty from a credit worthy entity of all of Party A’s obligations under the merger agreement (including payment in full of the purchase price and damages for pre-closing breaches).

On November 25, 2020 (Seoul time), Party A sent an e-mail to our Board withdrawing the Party A November 20 Offer.

On November 25, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest updates in communications with Party A. Our Board authorized Mr. YJ Kim to re-engage with Party A to discuss reasons why Party A withdrew the Party A November 20 Offer and to proceed to negotiate a transaction with Party A at a purchase price of $22.00 per share of Company Common Stock.

On November 26, 2020, Mr. YJ Kim called representatives of Party A to indicate that our Board was committed to exploring a potential transaction with Party A. Party A agreed to re-engage with the Company. On November 27, 2020, Mr. YJ Kim e-mailed Party A to confirm the parties were re-engaged and noted that the most efficient path forward would be for Paul, Weiss and Party A’s legal counsel to finalize the Party A Term Sheet.

On November 29, 2020, Party D called Mr. Tanner to note that Party D would be willing to raise its offer price, agree to a reverse termination fee of 8-10% of equity transaction value and consider other terms that are important to our Board.

On November 30, 2020, Party D e-mailed Mr. YJ Kim increasing their offer price to $23.50 per share of Company Common Stock. Party D noted that this revised offer would remain open until December 12, 2020. Moreover, Party D reiterated that it needs to conduct its due diligence, including business information review.

On December 1, 2020, Party A’s legal counsel delivered to Paul, Weiss a revised draft of the Party A Term Sheet. The revised Party A Term Sheet made the following key changes, among other things: removal of the Deposit, addition of a six month period during which Party A can obtain ODI Approval without being obligated to close the transaction, addition of a reverse termination fee payable by Party A equal to 5% of the equity transaction value in the event of a breach by Party A or failure to obtain ODI Approval, and increase of the

39

Company termination fee to 2.0% (from 1.5%) of the equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated for a proposal made during the go-shop period. The revised Party A Term Sheet also stated that the reverse termination fee would be guaranteed by a creditworthy entity or entities affiliated with Party A.

On December 1, 2020, Party A emailed our Board indicating that the latest draft of the Party A Term Sheet that their counsel shared with Paul, Weiss on December 1, 2020 represented their “best and final” position on the fundamental terms. Party A requested that the Company provide a clear response to their latest draft of the Party A Term Sheet and open access to a virtual data room to facilitate Party A’s due diligence, no later than December 2, 2020.

On December 1, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest draft of the Party A Term Sheet. Paul, Weiss presented a summary of the changes to the Party A Term Sheet. Our Board and Paul, Weiss further discussed Party A’s e-mail to our Board dated December 1, 2020 and Party D’s updated unsolicited communication. Our Board determined, after discussion with its advisors, that the Company should communicate to Party A that if Party A’s proposal in the e-mail dated December 1, 2020 represented its final position, then our Board would not be able to accept Party A’s proposal. However, if Party A was willing to move toward more market terms that provide greater certainty of closing, then the Company would be able to discuss with Party A further on an exclusive basis. On December 1, 2020, after the meeting of our Board, Mr. YJ Kim relayed this message to Party A.

From December 3 to 9, 2020, at the direction of our Board, Mr. YJ Kim, Mr. T. Kim, Paul, Weiss, the Head of M&A at Party A and Party A’s legal counsel continued negotiations regarding the Party A Term Sheet.

On December 10, 2020, a financial sponsor inquired about a potential transaction with the Company, and on December 17, 2020 (Seoul time), this party delivered an unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest addressed to Mr. YJ Kim, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company’s Power Solutions business.

On December 11, 2020, the Head of M&A at Party A spoke with Mr. YJ Kim to note that Party A had agreed to some of the Company’s proposals in the Party A Term Sheet, and that Party A would like to sign an exclusivity agreement with the Company and begin their due diligence the following week. He noted that Party A had agreed to the reverse termination fee of 7.5% (as opposed to 5%) of equity transaction value, and requested a Company termination fee of 4% of equity transaction value. On December 11, 2020, Paul, Weiss delivered a revised Party A Term Sheet reflecting the same, and clarifying that the reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value will be payable if the transaction is not consummated by a 6-month long-stop date as a result of termination by the Company due to Party A’s material uncured breach or Party A’s failure to close when all conditions are satisfied (with ODI Approval being deemed satisfied as of the long-stop date). The Party A Term Sheet also reflected, among other things, an offer price of $22.00 per share of Company Common Stock, equity commitment letters to be delivered by creditworthy entities affiliated with Party A (to which the Company will be third party beneficiary) for the entirety of the cash consideration that will be drawn upon to fund such consideration or any damages payable by Party A and limited guarantee(s) to be delivered by creditworthy entities affiliated with Party A that are established outside of the PRC and have U.S. dollar commitments from limited partners.

On December 12, 2020, Mr. YJ Kim called the Head of M&A at Party A to discuss the Party A Term Sheet, and Paul, Weiss spoke with Party A’s legal counsel to confirm the principals’ understanding.

On December 13, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest status of negotiations with Party A. Paul, Weiss provided an overview of the latest discussions with Party A’s legal counsel regarding various legal mechanisms to ensure certainty of closing of a potential transaction with Party A. Paul, Weiss noted that Party A had requested a period of exclusivity of 5-6 weeks. Our Board discussed what exclusivity period length would be appropriate. J.P. Morgan presented the materials it had

40

circulated to our Board in advance of the meeting relating to the proposed timeline for a potential transaction with Party A, status updates on key work-streams, and key valuation metrics. Our Board determined that Paul, Weiss should negotiate an exclusivity agreement with Party A for an exclusivity period of 14 days to be extended automatically one time by another seven days if Party A confirms to the Company in writing that the purchase price per share of Company Common Stock is at least $22.00 and thereafter, automatically extended by another seven days if Party A reconfirms to the Company in writing that the purchase price per share of Company Common Stock is at least $22.00 and has delivered a draft merger agreement to the Company that is, in the Company’s reasonable judgment, in substantially final form. On December 14, 2020, Paul, Weiss sent a draft exclusivity agreement to Party A’s legal counsel.

On December 15, 2020, at a meeting of our Board to continue the discussions from the meeting on December 13, 2020, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest status of negotiations with Party A and the draft of the exclusivity agreement. In light of the attractiveness of Party A’s offer relative to the offer of any other party with whom the Company was then in dialogue, our Board determined to enter into exclusivity with Party A. Shortly thereafter, Mr. YJ Kim had a call with representatives of Party A to relay our Board’s willingness to enter into exclusivity with Party A and on December 16, 2020, the Company and Party A entered into an exclusivity agreement for a period of 14 days to be extended automatically up to two times for seven days each as described above.

On December 17, 2020 (Seoul time), J.P. Morgan facilitated a management presentation for Party A, and provided access to a virtual data room to Party A to facilitate their due diligence investigation of the Company. Paul, Weiss sent Party A’s legal counsel a draft merger agreement reflecting the terms of the Party A Term Sheet, except with a go-shop period of 45 days.

On December 23, 2020, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest status of negotiations and the due diligence process with Party A. Our Board also discussed the preliminary indication of interest dated December 17, 2020 (Seoul time) regarding the potential acquisition of the Company’s Power Solutions business, and it was determined that J.P. Morgan should not engage with the financial sponsor that had submitted this indication of interest given past experiences with this party and since it was only interested in acquiring the Company’s Power Solutions business, and pending exclusivity with Party A.

On December 30, 2020, Party A confirmed to the Company in writing that the purchase price is at least $22.00 per share of Company Common Stock, and thereafter, the exclusivity period was extended by another seven days until January 6, 2021.

On January 3, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel emailed Paul, Weiss an initial issues list based on the initial draft of the merger agreement that Paul, Weiss had sent to Party A’s legal counsel on December 18, 2020. In the issues list, Party A limited their economic exposure for breach or failure to close to the reverse termination fee. Party A also took the position that any injunction or other regulatory failure should not trigger payment of the reverse termination fee by Party A. Party A also noted a number of items in the issues list as being open.

On January 6, 2021, the exclusivity period with Party A expired.

On January 8, 2021, at a meeting of our Board and Paul, Weiss, our Board tasked the Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee to consider forming an ad hoc committee of our Board to ensure the efficient coordination of the transaction and consider engaging additional legal counsel for our directors and such committee.

On January 10, 2021, the Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee had a meeting in which the relevant members of our Board determined to recommend to our Board that an ad hoc committee (the “Ad Hoc Transaction Committee”) consisting of two members, Mr. Camillo Martino and Mr. Tanner, be formed to ensure the efficient coordination of the transaction by the Company, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan.

41

On January 11, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel sent a revised draft of the merger agreement to Paul, Weiss. Key issues included those previewed in the issues list that Party A’s legal counsel had sent to Paul, Weiss on January 3, 2021, and a reduction of the go-shop period from 45 days to 30 days. In the draft merger agreement, Party A noted that if the Company’s cash on the balance sheet is not available for use by Party A at closing, Party A will need a bridge loan.

On January 11, 2021, at an executive session following a full meeting of our Board, our Board formally established the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee.

From January 11, 2021 to February 22, 2021, J.P. Morgan engaged in discussions with a potential strategic buyer, but these did not materialize into meaningful negotiations as this party refused to present our Board with an indication of interest or accept any economic exposure in connection with U.S. regulatory approvals.

On January 15, 2021, our Board authorized J.P. Morgan to engage further with Party D and two other strategic parties.

On January 18, 2021, J.P. Morgan had a call with Party D to discuss the status of its offer. On January 19, 2021, J.P. Morgan e-mailed Party D with a summary of items they had discussed and which should be updated in any future indication of interest from Party D, including details about source of funds, overall process and timing (including with respect to setting up an investment vehicle), the amount of a reverse termination fee triggered by failure to obtain regulatory approval, and proposed closing conditions.

On January 20, 2021, at a meeting of our Board, our Board authorized Mr. Martino to engage in discussions with Party A directly on behalf of our Board.

On January 21, 2021, Party D delivered an unsolicited, non-binding letter, addressed to our Board, as a supplement to Party D’s second indication of interest dated October 12, 2020. The letter addressed Party D’s proposed source of funding, deal structure, timing and process considerations, termination fees (reverse termination fee of 8% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated for Party D’s failure to secure any PRC regulatory approval) and re-stated the offer price of $23.50 per share of Company Common Stock from their e-mail of November 30, 2020. Party D also had a call with J.P. Morgan noting that they would provide an update regarding their regulatory assessment a week later.

On January 22, 2021, Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim spoke to Party A and made the following three proposals in the context of the negotiations at the time: (1) a reverse termination fee equal to 4% of the equity transaction value will be payable by Party A if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues and no reverse termination fee will be payable if the merger agreement is terminated due to Korean regulatory issues, (2) price should be increased to $24.00 per share of Company Common Stock and (3) the parties will commit to sign definitive documents relating to a transaction by February 1, 2021.

On January 24, 2021, Party A sent an e-mail to Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim, noting that Party A is willing to agree to take all actions necessary (i.e., a “hell or high water” undertaking) to comply with remedial actions requested by a U.S. governmental authority, but would not agree to a reverse termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues. Party A also noted that they would be willing to raise the price per share of Company Common Stock to $25.00, provided there is no go-shop provision. Moreover, Party A noted it was committed to sign definitive documents relating to a transaction five business days after receiving a revised merger agreement and responses to pending diligence requests. At a meeting of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee later that same day, Party A’s e-mail and the status of their legal due diligence was discussed by the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, Paul, Weiss, J.P. Morgan, Mr. YJ Kim and Mr. T. Kim.

On January 25, 2021, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest proposal from Party A in their e-mail dated January 24, 2021, including the fact that they were no longer amenable to a go-shop provision and that they were only willing to commit to a “hell or high water” undertaking

42

and not a reverse termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues. Our Board authorized Mr. Martino to respond to Party A as set forth in the following paragraph. Our Board also discussed retaining additional legal counsel for our directors and the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee. It was then determined by our Board to retain Richards, Layton & Finger (“RLF”) as additional legal counsel to our directors and the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, which firm was subsequently formally engaged following review of RLF’s candidacy and qualifications.

On January 26, 2021, Mr. Martino responded to Party A by e-mail noting that the price per share of Company Common Stock should be $25.50 in exchange for (1) the merger agreement not containing a go-shop provision, (2) a termination fee equal to 3% of equity transaction value payable by the Company if the merger agreement is terminated for a superior proposal and (3) a reverse termination fee equal to 4% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues.

On January 26, 2021, Party A responded to Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim by e-mail agreeing to a price of $25.50 per share of Company Common Stock and a 3% termination fee payable by the Company, but again rejected a reverse termination fee payable by it due to U.S. regulatory issues and reiterated its willingness to agree to a “hell or high water” standard in respect of a request from a U.S. governmental authority.

Between January 27 to 29, 2021, the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, our Board, Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan met on various occasions to discuss Party A’s latest proposal in their e-mail on January 26, 2021, including Party A’s rejection of a reverse termination fee payable by it due to U.S. regulatory issues, and the strategy going forward with Party A. The Ad Hoc Transaction Committee determined that they would seek to improve the headline price in light of no reverse termination fee payable due to U.S. regulatory issues.

On February 1, 2021, Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim spoke to Party A in response to their e-mail. Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim noted that the price per share of Company Common Stock would need to be significantly higher if there will be no reverse termination fee payable due to U.S. regulatory issues. Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim also stated that it was important for the Company that the reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value for the non-U.S. regulatory triggers be U.S. dollar-guaranteed and that quick execution of documents was imperative.

On February 1, 2021, Party A sent an e-mail to Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim reiterating its commitment to a “hell or high water” standard (but no reverse termination fee payable due to U.S. regulatory issues) and a willingness to further engage with the Company on that basis. Party A also noted that it was open to further discussion on price subject to reaching agreement on all material terms of the transaction.

On February 1, 2021, following a meeting of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan, Mr. Martino sent an e-mail to Party A proposing a price increase to $27.50 per share of Company Common Stock in exchange for agreeing to no reverse termination fee due to U.S. regulatory issues. Mr. Martino noted that once agreed, he would instruct management and advisors to engage towards reaching a definitive agreement in the next 10-12 days.

On February 1, 2021, a consortium of two financial sponsors, consisting of Wise Road and a party we refer to as Party E (including its representatives), sent an e-mail to Mr. YJ Kim, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company through a public tender offer. Parent and Party E suggested that if the stockholders of the Company are interested in a potential sale of the Company, Mr. YJ Kim should have a meeting in Korea with one of their representatives.

On February 2, 2021, Party D had a call with J.P. Morgan where Party D indicated that their offer would not include any reverse termination fee payable by Party D if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues.

43

On February 2, 2021, BMO Capital Markets Corp. (including its representatives, “BMO”), the financial advisor of Wise Road, contacted Mr. Tanner to express Wise Road’s interest in exploring a potential transaction with the Company. Mr. Tanner then forwarded J.P. Morgan’s contact information to BMO.

On February 3, 2021, Party A sent an e-mail to Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim indicating that due to the request for a higher price, Party A was no longer interested in pursuing the transaction further.

On February 3, 2021, following a meeting of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan, in response to the above e-mail, Mr. Martino sent an e-mail to Party A reiterating that our Board could only drop its request for a reverse termination fee in the event of U.S. regulatory issues if Party A would be willing to pay a higher price per share of Company Common Stock, but that he would nevertheless instruct Paul, Weiss to deliver a revised merger agreement to Party A’s legal counsel.

On February 4, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent a revised draft of the merger agreement to Party A’s legal counsel.

On February 5, 2021, Party A sent an e-mail to Mr. Martino and Mr. YJ Kim indicating that they have instructed their legal counsel to review the draft merger agreement that Paul, Weiss sent to them on February 4, 2021. Party A requested cooperation from the Company on certain diligence items.

On February 5, 2021, Mr. Martino sent an e-mail to Party A indicating that he has authorized the Company’s senior management team to coordinate with Party A to resolve remaining diligence and documentation items quickly, with the expectation of finalizing price negotiations and announcing the potential transaction in no more than 7-10 days. Further, Mr. Martino requested information about Party A’s planned sources and uses of financing and the identity of equity or debt financing sources.

Between February 5, 2021 and March 17, 2021, BMO had a number of conversations with Messrs. Tanner and Martino about the potential transaction, including the overall process and timing and some of the terms being offered by Wise Road.

On February 6, 2021, Party A sent J.P. Morgan its proposed sources of equity and debt financing. In response, Mr. Martino sent an e-mail to Party A granting consent to Party A to reach out to its proposed equity and debt financing sources, and requesting more details on one of the equity sources.

On February 7, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel sent a draft equity commitment letter and limited guaranty to Paul, Weiss, as well as the financial statements of the proposed guarantor.

On February 7, 2021, at the direction of our Board, Paul, Weiss sent an e-mail to Party A and its legal counsel noting that our Board is unlikely to accept Party A’s proposed funding package with the proposed guarantor. Paul, Weiss then had two calls with Party A’s legal counsel in which Paul, Weiss stated that the Company will require a U.S. dollar escrow or otherwise it cannot move forward with a transaction with Party A.

On February 7, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent a draft company disclosure letter to Party A’s legal counsel.

On February 8, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel sent a revised draft of the merger agreement to Paul, Weiss.

On February 8, 2021, BMO delivered an unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest on behalf of Wise Road and Party E (represented by another financial advisor), as a consortium, addressed to our Board, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company at a purchase price of $26.00 per share of Company Common Stock. The consortium indicated in the indication of interest that they intended to finance the transaction with a combination of equity and debt, but that they were prepared to provide an equity commitment letter for up to 100% of the purchase price, with debt financing to be arranged between signing and closing. In the indication of interest, the consortium proposed a reverse termination fee of 2% of enterprise value payable to the Company if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues, but no reverse termination fee

44

in connection with a failure to obtain ODI Approval since they did not anticipate any ODI approval being required. The indication of interest further proposed a termination fee of 2% of the enterprise value payable by the Company to the consortium if the Company terminates the merger agreement. At a meeting of our Board later that day, the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee provided an update on the latest status of the negotiations with the parties with respect to a potential transaction with the Company.

February 9, 2021, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss, and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest status of negotiations with Party A, including the approach to be taken in light of the preliminary indication of interest received from Wise Road and Party E. J.P. Morgan provided an overview of Wise Road and Party E. It was determined by our Board that J.P. Morgan would continue engaging with both Party A, as well as the consortium of Wise Road and Party E.

On February 9, 2021, J.P. Morgan spoke with BMO to relay that the proposal from Wise Road and Party E would need to be improved by increasing their offered price above $26.00 per share of Company Common Stock.

On February 9, 2021, at a meeting of our Board attended by Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan, Paul, Weiss provided a status update of the negotiations with Party A.

Between February 9 and February 21, 2021, Paul, Weiss and Party A’s legal counsel exchanged drafts of the company disclosure letter and various ancillary documents related to the debt and equity financing.

On February 11 and February 20, 2021, the Company entered into confidentiality agreements with each of Wise Road and Party E, respectively, which included a customary standstill with a fall-away provision in the event that the Company enters into a definitive agreement with another party with respect to all or a controlling portion of the Company’s equity securities or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. J.P. Morgan provided Wise Road, Party E and their representatives with access to a virtual data room in order to facilitate their due diligence investigation of the Company.

On February 13, 2021, J.P. Morgan sent a draft merger agreement prepared by Paul, Weiss to BMO for review by Wise Road, Party E and their counsel. The draft merger agreement was substantially similar to the version of the draft merger agreement originally sent to Party A, except with (1) a customary no shop provision (consistent with what was being discussed with Party A), (2) a cash deposit into escrow or a letter of credit to be delivered at signing as security for the payment of the reverse termination fee and/or any damages for breach in connection with the merger agreement, and (3) no condition with respect to ODI Approvals.

On February 15, 2021, J.P. Morgan sent a draft company disclosure letter to Wise Road, Party E and their counsel.

On February 18, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent to Party A and their legal counsel an issues list based on the draft merger agreement that Party A’s legal counsel had sent to Paul, Weiss on February 8, 2021. The issues list included, among other things, the Company’s position that (1) the equity commitment letter should cover the full amount of the merger consideration (i.e., including the portion to be financed by debt and not just the equity portion) and should cover damages for Party A’s material breach (which should not be limited to the reverse termination fee), (2) a U.S. cash escrow or letter of credit at a U.S. bank is required to backstop the payment of the reverse termination fee, (3) the “hell or high water” standard should apply in all regulatory situations, not just in the case of a request or requirement from a U.S. governmental authority, and (4) the reverse termination fee payable by Party A should be 7.5% (Party A had proposed 6%) of equity transaction value.

On February 22, 2021, the Head of M&A at Party A sent an e-mail to Mr. Martino, certain members of the Company’s management, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan. He acknowledged receipt of the issues list that Paul, Weiss sent to Party A’s legal counsel on February 18, 2021 and provided proposals on certain key commercial issues with a goal to resolve those and finalize the transaction documents shortly thereafter. Party A proposed the

45

following, among other things: (1) a cash escrow will be provided upon signing and deposited in an onshore (i.e., within the PRC) escrow account in the amount of 8% of the total equity transaction value to secure payment of the contemplated reverse termination fee, (2) Party A will accept certain exceptions in the definition of “Company Material Adverse Effect,” provided that the Company agrees that it will not continue to discuss a transaction with other bidders after signing or have the right to postpone the stockholders meeting pending discussion with other bidders, (3) Party A will accept a “hell or high water” standard in relation to obtaining ODI Approval (in addition to in relation to any filings or orders required by U.S. governmental authorities) and (4) the reverse termination fee will be a cap on the amount of damages to which the Company is entitled if Party A breaches the merger agreement, including in the event of failure to close the transaction, and specific performance will not be available to the Company if there has been a debt financing failure. He noted further that once the parties agree on these key points, the parties would instruct their respective counsel to finalize any other outstanding points and all transaction documents for signing on an expedited basis. On February 23, 2021, Party A’s response from the previous day and key legal and commercial issues arising from the negotiations with Party A, as well as the status of negotiations with Wise Road and Party E, were discussed at a meeting of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan.

On February 24, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent to Party A and their legal counsel a further revised issues list based on the draft merger agreement that Party A’s legal counsel sent to Paul, Weiss on February 8, 2021. The revised issues list provided the following, among other things: (1) the Company will accept an equity commitment letter for less than the full amount of the merger consideration provided that a customary debt commitment letter (with no condition that the Company have a minimum cash balance at closing) is delivered for the balance, (2) in the event of a termination of the merger agreement for Party A’s material breach, the Company’s damages will be limited to the reverse termination fee, (3) reiteration that the Company will not proceed with the transaction in the absence of a U.S. dollar cash escrow or letter of credit at a U.S. bank backstopping the reverse termination fee, but will accept a reverse termination fee of 7.5% of the equity transaction value, (4) there will be no go-shop provision and (5) all regulatory risk for regulatory failure in the PRC will be borne by Party A.

On February 26, 2021, Paul, Weiss had a call with Party A and its legal counsel to discuss the issues list that Paul, Weiss circulated on February 24, 2021. During the discussion, Party A stated that it was assuming that there would be a certain amount of cash at the Company at closing that Party A would need in order pay the purchase price and that Party A was not willing to provide a U.S. Dollar escrow or letter of credit to backstop the reverse termination fee.

On February 27, 2021, BMO sent to Paul, Weiss a revised draft of the merger agreement (other than the representations and warranties section) prepared by Wise Road’s legal counsel, Hogan Lovells (including its representatives, “Hogan Lovells”), along with a draft equity commitment letter. Among other changes, the draft of the merger agreement provided that (1) the regulatory reverse termination fee would only be payable if the transaction were blocked by the United States government and (2) Wise Road would provide an equity commitment letter backed by U.S. dollar offshore funds, as opposed to providing a deposit into escrow or a letter of credit at signing as security for the payment of the reverse termination fee and/or any damages for breach in connection with the merger agreement.

On February 27, 2021, at the direction of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, Paul, Weiss sent an e-mail to Hogan Lovells noting that while the Company may be amenable to move away from requiring a deposit or letter of credit at signing, the Company will need to be provided with satisfactory proof of funds from the entities that execute the equity commitment letter.

On February 28, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent Hogan Lovells a revised draft of the merger agreement. Among other changes, the draft of the merger agreement provided (1) that the Company’s willingness to remove the escrow/letter of credit requirement was conditioned on getting comfort around the ability to access U.S. dollar funds without any ODI Approval or other approval, (2) a proposed Company termination fee of 2.75% of equity transaction value and

46

(3) a proposed reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value payable in the event of, among other circumstances, an order prohibiting the transaction or failure to obtain regulatory approvals.

On February 28, 2021, BMO confirmed to J.P. Morgan that Wise Road was no longer considering a consortium bid with Party E, and would be continuing its bid independently.

On March 1, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent a revised draft of the merger agreement to Paul, Weiss reflecting their comments to the representations and warranties section only.

On March 1, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent Party A’s legal counsel a revised draft of the Merger Agreement. The revised draft of the merger agreement included, among other things, (1) that Party A would deposit into escrow cash at signing as security for payment of the reverse termination fee, and (2) re-insertion of a higher reverse termination fee of 7.5% (as opposed to 6%) of equity transaction value, which would be payable, among other circumstances, if the merger agreement were terminated due to a PRC regulatory issue (it was accepted that no reverse termination fee would be payable if the merger agreement were terminated due to any other regulatory issue).

On March 3, 2021, market rumors were published regarding a potential acquisition of the Company.

On March 3, 2021, at a meeting of our Board, our Board and Paul, Weiss discussed options for our Board in light of the publication of market rumors regarding a potential acquisition of the Company, including whether to continue with a deal process or to shut the deal process down. After deliberation, it was determined by our Board that the deal process would be continued.

Between March 3 and March 16, 2021, four potential acquirers contacted J.P. Morgan inquiring about a potential transaction, but after this initial inquiry, each of the potential acquirers either did not follow up with further interest about a potential transaction or confirmed they were no longer interested. One of such potential acquirers was Party C, who on March 4, 2021, delivered a second unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest, addressed to our Board, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company by Party C for a purchase price of $24.04 per share of Company Common Stock. Party C subsequently withdrew its indication of interest.

On March 4, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent Paul, Weiss a revised draft of the merger agreement. The revised draft of the merger agreement included, among other things, (1) an increased Company termination fee of 3.75% (from 2.75%) of the equity transaction value, (2) a termination right of Parent if a governmental authority notifies either party that an approval or consent will be conditioned on the imposition of a “burdensome condition” (i.e., certain conditions that Parent would not be willing to accept) and payment of the reverse termination fee in such circumstance (but some lower amount which was left blank), and (3) payment of a reduced (amount left blank) reverse termination fee by Parent if the merger agreement is terminated as a result of a decision by the United States government to prohibit the merger.

On March 4, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel sent to Paul, Weiss a list of responses to issues raised in the draft merger agreement that Paul, Weiss had sent to Party A’s legal counsel on March 2, 2021. Among other proposals, the list included Party A’s agreement (1) to obtain a U.S. dollar standby letter of credit outside of the PRC at signing to secure payment of the reverse termination fee, (2) that the “hell or high water” standard would apply to any PRC or U.S. governmental approvals, but any efforts required with respect to Korean governmental authorities would be subject to certain limitations on divestitures, (3) that the reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value will be payable if the merger agreement is terminated due to a PRC regulatory issue and (4) to increase the amount of the equity commitment from its sponsors to offset the potential decrease in its debt commitment.

On March 4, 2021, at the direction of our Board, Mr. YJ Kim and Paul, Weiss had a call with Party A to discuss the latest open points in their negotiations. Party A’s legal counsel confirmed that Party A was in a position to be able to deliver a U.S. Dollar standby letter of credit from a bank outside of the PRC to secure payment of the reverse termination fee.

47

On March 5, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel sent to Paul, Weiss a revised draft of the merger agreement. The key changes in the revised draft of the merger agreement were those that were previewed in the list of responses to outstanding issues that Party A’s legal counsel had sent to Paul, Weiss on March 4, 2021.

On March 5, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent Paul, Weiss details relating to Parent’s proposed equity financing sources in response to Paul, Weiss’ requests for proof of sufficient funds.

On March 5, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent Hogan Lovells a revised draft of the merger agreement. The revised draft of the merger agreement included, among other things, (1) a decreased Company termination fee of 3% (from 3.75%) of equity transaction value and (2) one reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value (as opposed to a higher and lower reverse termination fee) payable if, among other circumstances, the merger agreement is terminated due to any regulatory issue.

On March 5, 2021, BMO spoke with J.P. Morgan and submitted an offer price of $26.25 per share of Company Common Stock on behalf of Wise Road.

On March 6, 2021, at the direction of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, J.P. Morgan called BMO to indicate that (1) the increase in the offer price was not sufficient and (2) the Company will require a reverse termination fee of at least 5% of the equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues and a higher reverse termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated for any other regulatory issues.

On March 6, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel sent to Paul, Weiss a draft standby letter of credit, pursuant to which the amount of the reverse termination fee was immediately available to be drawn by the Company upon delivery of a demand notice by the Company to the bank certifying that the reverse termination fee was payable.

On March 6, 2021, the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee met with Paul, Weiss and RLF to discuss the status of the negotiations with both Wise Road and Party A.

On March 6, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent Paul, Weiss a key issues list based on the draft merger agreement that Paul, Weiss had sent to Hogan Lovells on March 5, 2021. The issues list included, among other things, Wise Road’s position that (1) the Company termination fee is agreed at 3% of equity transaction value, except in circumstances in which the Company refuses to close when all conditions are satisfied, in which case it should be 7.5% of equity transaction value, (2) a reverse termination fee of (i) 7.5% of equity transaction value will be payable in the event of (A) Parent’s failure to close when all conditions are satisfied, or (B) failure to obtain PRC antitrust approval and (ii) 5.0% of equity transaction value will be payable if the merger agreement is terminated due to a U.S. regulatory issue, and (3) the definition of “burdensome condition” should be broader than what was proposed by the Company.

On March 7, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent an annotated issues list in response to Hogan Lovells’s issues list delivered to Paul, Weiss on March 6, 2021. Hogan Lovells then sent Paul, Weiss a revised draft of the merger agreement, which reflected the issues list that it had sent to Paul, Weiss on March 6, 2021. Shortly thereafter, Paul, Weiss and Hogan Lovells had a call to discuss the issues list as annotated by Paul, Weiss. The annotated issues list sent by Paul, Weiss included, among other things, the Company’s position that (1) the Company termination fee of 3% of equity transaction value is agreed but there should not be a separate 7.5% termination fee for failure to close, (2) the reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value for Parent’s failure to close and failure to obtain PRC antitrust approval is agreed, but the reverse termination fee of 5% of the equity transaction value with respect to U.S. regulatory issues remains an open point and (3) the broadening of the definition of “Burdensome Condition” is rejected.

On March 8, 2021, at a meeting of our Board, our Board, Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan discussed the latest status of the negotiations with both Wise Road and Party A. Paul, Weiss provided an overview for our

48

Board of the key high-level issues in the negotiations with Wise Road and Party A regarding financing and source of funds, and governmental approvals and termination fees. Our Board discussed differences in each party’s position on key issues and timeline.

Between March 9 and March 19, 2021, at the direction of our Board, Paul, Weiss had calls with Hogan Lovells and various contacts at Wise Road to understand its proposed equity financing package and proof of sufficient funds. During the course of such discussions, Paul, Weiss reiterated its request on numerous occasions for a deposit into escrow or letter of credit at signing to backstop the full amount of the reverse termination fee.

On March 9, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent Hogan Lovells a revised draft of the merger agreement. The draft of merger agreement included, among other things, (1) acceptance of the ability of Parent to seek damages up to, but never in excess of, 7.5% of the equity transaction value (i.e. the Company termination fee is not the sole and exclusive remedy), (2) only one reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value, including in the event the merger agreement is terminated due to a U.S., Korean or PRC regulatory issue, and (3) rejection of Wise Road’s language broadening the definition of “Burdensome Condition.”

On March 9, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent Party A’s legal counsel a revised draft of the merger agreement. The draft of the merger agreement included, among other things, that the “hell or high water” standard is applicable to efforts to obtain all regulatory approvals, except that with respect to Korean governmental authorities, Party A would not be required to take certain divestiture actions.

On March 10, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel had a call with Paul, Weiss to discuss their comments to the draft of the merger agreement that Paul, Weiss had sent to Party A’s legal counsel on March 9, 2021. Later that day, Party A’s legal counsel sent Paul, Weiss a revised draft of the merger agreement. The draft of merger agreement included, among other things, that if the merger agreement is terminated due to Parent’s breach, the reverse termination fee is only payable if the breach was a willful and material breach.

On March 11, 2021, Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan had a call with the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee to discuss the latest status of the negotiations with Wise Road and Party A. Following the meeting, as directed by the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, J.P. Morgan communicated to both Party A and Wise Road that our Board would require their best and final offers on purchase price by the end of the week and also requested from Wise Road certain additional proof of funding and other documentation related to their source of funds (including having certain offshore funding sources execute equity commitment letters in their personal capacity).

On March 11, 2021, Party A’s legal counsel sent Paul, Weiss a draft back-up standby letter of credit from a different bank than the first standby letter of credit delivered, which would be used in the event there were any issues at signing in connection with the original issuing bank. Similar to the standby letter of credit initially delivered to Paul, Weiss by Party A’s legal counsel, funds thereunder could be drawn upon demand by the Company.

On March 11, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent Paul, Weiss drafts of two standby letters of credit from two different banks, intended to secure only a portion of the reverse termination fee (not the full amount), and both of which the Company could only draw upon after a final arbitral award is granted.

On March 14, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent a revised draft of the merger agreement. The revised draft of the merger agreement provided, among other things, (1) for a broader definition of “Burdensome Condition,” (2) for a lower reverse termination fee of 5% of equity transaction value if there is a prohibitive order from a U.S. or Korean governmental authority or an approval required or requested by a U.S. or Korean governmental authority has not been obtained without the imposition of a Burdensome Condition and (3) that if the merger agreement is terminated for Parent’s breach, the reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value is only payable if such breach is a willful and material breach of the reasonable best efforts and regulatory efforts covenants.

49

On March 14, 2021, Wise Road delivered a revised, non-binding proposal, addressed to our Board, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company, noting they had completed their due diligence and were prepared to sign definitive agreements and provide equity commitment letters for 100% of the purchase price with offshore funds. In the new proposal, Wise Road increased its offer price to $28.50 per share of Company Common Stock and noted they would provide letters of credit in the amount of $53,500,000 to support limited guarantees being delivered in respect of the reverse termination fee (and committed to provide, if required by the Company, additional letters of credit for the remainder of the reverse termination fee within six (6) weeks of execution of the merger agreement). Further, Wise Road indicated that they had arranged additional onshore funding as redundant sources of equity should there be any unanticipated challenges with delivering any of the offshore equity commitments. The Ad Hoc Transaction Committee and J.P. Morgan had a call with Wise Road and BMO later that day to discuss Wise Road’s revised proposal.

On March 14, 2021, Party A sent an e-mail to Mr. Martino, Mr. YJ Kim, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan noting that their proposed offer price per share of Company Common Stock has increased to $26.50 from $25.50. Party A further noted that they would be willing to offer a reverse termination fee of 2% of the equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues.

On March 15, 2021, a strategic bidder we refer to as Party F (including its representatives) delivered an unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest, addressed to Mr. YJ Kim, regarding the potential acquisition of the Company by Party F, including a request to conduct due diligence on the Company. The indication of interest indicated a potential value of $25.00-29.00 per share of Company Common Stock on an all cash basis, subject to a number of conditions.

On March 15, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent Hogan Lovells an issues list with the Company positions based on the draft merger agreement that Hogan Lovells had sent to Paul, Weiss on March 14, 2021. The issues list included, among other things, the Company’s position that (1) the standby letter of credit should be for the full amount of the reverse termination fee and that the Company should be able to submit a demand notice to the issuing bank when the Parent Termination Fee is due but unpaid, (2) it is willing to accept a modified version of the definition of “Burdensome Condition,” (3) a lower reverse termination fee of 5% of equity transaction value is acceptable with respect to U.S. regulatory issues but not with respect to Korean regulatory issues (which should result in a reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value), and (4) payment of the reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated for Parent’s willful and material breach should not be limited to breach of the reasonable best efforts or regulatory efforts covenant.

On March 16, 2021, at the direction of our Board, J.P. Morgan reached out to two potential acquirers to assess their interest in a potential transaction. This outreach did not result in meaningful engagement about a potential transaction with the Company.

On March 17, 2021, BMO sent Paul, Weiss an addendum to Wise Road’s revised non-binding proposal dated March 14, 2021, which indicated Wise Road’s expectation that it would fund the transaction with offshore funds, but in the unlikely event that some of the offshore funds were unavailable, it had additional onshore financing sources as a back-up. The addendum also included Wise Road’s responses to the key issues list Paul, Weiss had sent to Hogan Lovells on March 15, 2021. Wise Road accepted, among other things, the Company’s position that the lower reverse termination fee of 5% of equity transaction value should apply with respect to termination of the merger agreement due to U.S. regulatory issues only and the higher reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value will apply to termination of the merger agreement due to Korean regulatory issues. Wise Road rejected, among other things, the Company’s position with respect to the definition of “Burdensome Condition” and with respect to payment of the reverse termination fee in the event of a willful and material breach being limited to a breach by Parent of those certain specified covenants.

On March 17, 2021, at a meeting of our Board, Paul, Weiss presented a side-by-side comparison of the current offers from Wise Road and Party A and provided a status update on the negotiations with both parties.

50

On March 18, 2021, Party A sent an e-mail to Mr. Martino, Mr. YJ Kim, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan noting that per its phone discussion with J.P. Morgan, their offer will expire at 12:00 am in Beijing, China that day, and they will instruct their advisors and debt financing sources to stop all work streams beginning the next day if they receive no response. Our Board discussed Party A’s e-mail and in light of the lower price and less protection on regulatory issues, determined not to respond to Party A’s final offer and let it expire.

On March 18, 2021, Paul, Weiss sent Hogan Lovells a revised draft of the merger agreement reflecting the agreed positions of the parties pursuant to the issues lists discussed above and the Company’s positions with respect to the definition of “Burdensome Condition” and the reverse termination fee in the event of a willful and material breach being only payable for breach of those certain specified covenants.

On March 18, 2021, Party C called J.P. Morgan to inform them that they were looking to revise their previously withdrawn proposal but that they were not sure if they could provide a revised proposal promptly. They asked J.P. Morgan if $28.00 per share of Company Common Stock would be sufficient. J.P. Morgan told Party C that our Board will evaluate any formal proposals, but an offer price of $28.00 per share of Company Common Stock may not be competitive and that their offer price should be closer to $30.00 per share of Company Common Stock.

From March 18 to March 19, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent additional materials to Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan regarding details around Wise Road’s proposed financing package.

On March 21, 2021, BMO sent an update to J.P. Morgan noting that funds in the amount of $103,500,000 had been deposited in China CITIC Bank International’s New York branch (the “Issuing Bank”) to be drawn under the terms of a standby letter of credit issued by the Issuing Bank, in the event that Parent does not pay the Company the reverse termination fee in the circumstances described therein. Hogan Lovells sent to Paul, Weiss additional materials relating to Wise Road’s proposed financing package and proof of funds.

On March 21, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent Paul, Weiss executed investor commitment letters, which were commitments from Wise Road’s equity financing sources to Sponsor and to which the Company is a third party beneficiary, for an aggregate amount of $2,249,800,000.

On March 22, 2021, Hogan Lovells sent Paul, Weiss a revised draft of the merger agreement, which included, among other things, (1) further modifications to broaden the definition of “Burdensome Condition,” and (2) re-insertion of the limitation on payment of the reverse termination fee for a willful and material breach of Parent to a breach of those certain specified covenants. Later that day, Paul, Weiss sent Hogan Lovells a further revised draft of the merger agreement which made minor modifications to the definition of “Burdensome Condition.” The revised draft delivered by Paul, Weiss also accepted Wise Road’s position on payment of the reverse termination fee only if there has been a willful and material breach by Parent of those certain specified covenants, but added that the Company may seek damages up to, but never in excess of, 7.5% of the equity transaction value (i.e., the reverse termination fee is not the sole and exclusive remedy and damages for willful and material breach may be sought in circumstances where the reverse termination fee is not payable).

On March 22, 2021, our Board had a meeting with Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan. Paul, Weiss delivered a presentation about the directors’ fiduciary duties and the principal terms of the draft merger agreement with Parent. J.P. Morgan provided a presentation about the sale process taken to date and their perspective on the valuation based on financial analyses previously provided to our Board.

On March 23, 2021, BMO and representatives of Wise Road had a call with J.P. Morgan and held firm on their offer price of $28.50 per share of Company Common Stock, and provided the following revised proposals: (1) a reverse termination fee equal to 5% of the equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. or Korean regulatory issues and (2) a reverse termination fee equal to 7.5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to any other regulatory issues. J.P. Morgan reiterated the Company’s position that the lower reverse termination fee of 5% of equity transaction value should apply in the

51

case of U.S. regulatory issues only and not Korean regulatory issues (which should be subject to the higher reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value). J.P. Morgan also relayed our Board’s position that the Company should be entitled to send a demand notice under the standby letter of credit immediately upon the reverse termination fee becoming due but unpaid, not after final arbitration.

On March 23, 2021, BMO sent an e-mail to J.P. Morgan noting that Wise Road’s offer remains $28.50 per share of Company Common Stock, and that should Wise Road accept the Company’s requirement that the funds in the standby letter of credit be released before final arbitration, then the reverse termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues will be reduced from 5% of equity transaction value to 3% of equity transaction value.

On March 23, 2021, at a meeting of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, Paul, Weiss, RLF, and J.P. Morgan discussed the e-mail sent by BMO to J.P. Morgan earlier that day, and different triggers to draw funds from the standby letter of credit.

On March 23, 2021, J.P. Morgan responded to BMO noting that the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee will not accept an offer price of $28.50 per share of Company Common Stock and that the reverse termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues will remain 5% of equity transaction value. J.P. Morgan also noted that in the event of a dispute, the Company should be able to draw the funds under the standby letter of credit immediately but the funds could be held in a segregated bank account while the dispute is ongoing.

On March 24, 2021, BMO had a call with J.P. Morgan to discuss J.P. Morgan’s feedback to BMO on March 23, 2021.

On March 24, 2021, BMO sent an e-mail to J.P. Morgan noting that Wise Road’s final terms, among others, are (1) $28.50 per share of Company Common Stock, (2) in case of a dispute over the reverse termination fee, the funds under the standby letter of credit would be moved to an escrow account, which would hold the funds until a settlement or arbitration is reached, and (3) a reduced reverse termination fee from 7.5% of equity transaction value to 5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to Korean regulatory issues. BMO’s e-mail to J.P. Morgan received earlier that day was discussed at a meeting of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, Paul, Weiss and J.P. Morgan later that day.

Between March 24 and March 25, 2021, J.P. Morgan, at the direction of our Board and the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, and BMO engaged in multiple discussions to negotiate final open issues, including the size of the reverse termination fee if the merger agreement is terminated due to Korean regulatory issues. As directed by our Board, J.P. Morgan requested (1) a purchase price of $29.50 per share of Company Common Stock, (2) for the funds that were deposited with the Issuing Bank to be immediately available upon the Company’s delivery of a demand notice, as opposed to after final arbitration, if Parent fails to pay the reverse termination fee and (3) the lower reverse termination fee of 5% of equity transaction value should apply in the case of U.S. regulatory issues only and not Korean regulatory issues. Wise Road held firm on their offer price of $28.50 per share of Company Common Stock and for a final arbitral award in favor of the Company in order for the funds under the standby letter of credit to be released.

On March 24, 2021, J.P. Morgan sent draft confidentiality agreements to Party C, Party F and a potential strategic buyer we refer to as Party G (including its representatives). The Company and Party G entered into a confidentiality agreement on March 24, 2021, which included a customary standstill with a fall-away provision in the event that the Company enters into a definitive agreement with respect to all or a controlling portion of the Company’s equity securities or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.

On March 25, 2021, J.P. Morgan and BMO held final negotiations. At the direction of the Ad Hoc Transaction Committee, J.P. Morgan requested (1) a price of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock,

52

(2) a reverse termination fee of 5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues only, and (3) a reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to any other regulatory issues.

Following the above negotiations, the parties’ final agreed terms were (1) a price of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock, (2) a reverse termination fee of 5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to U.S. regulatory issues only (i.e., $70,200,000), (3) a reverse termination fee of 6% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to Korean regulatory issues only (i.e., $84,300,000) and (4) a reverse termination fee of 7.5% of equity transaction value if the merger agreement is terminated due to any other regulatory issues (i.e., $105,300,000). J.P. Morgan and BMO agreed that the funds under the standby letter of credit would be placed into escrow in the event of a dispute over the payment of the reverse termination fee and would be released from escrow upon mutual agreement of Parent and the Company or upon the rendering of a final arbitral award with respect to such dispute.

During the course of the day on March 25, 2021, Hogan Lovells and Paul, Weiss exchanged revised drafts of the merger agreement and other transaction documents reflecting the agreement among the parties.

On March 25, 2021, our Board had a meeting with Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan to consider the Merger Agreement. Paul, Weiss provided an update on the negotiations with Wise Road since the previous meeting of our Board on March 22, 2021. J.P. Morgan delivered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the assumptions, limitations, qualifications and conditions described in J.P. Morgan’s opinion, the Merger Consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock to be received by the holders of the shares of Company Common Stock was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. For a discussion of J.P. Morgan’s opinion, see the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger – Fairness Opinion of J.P. Morgan” beginning on page 60 of this proxy statement. After discussion, our Board unanimously determined to declare that the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders of Company.

On March 25, 2021, after the meeting of our Board, Paul, Weiss and Hogan Lovells finalized the documentation, and the Company, Parent and Merger Sub entered into the Merger Agreement and other definitive ancillary transaction documentation.

Recommendation of Our Board and Reasons for the Merger

Recommendation of Our Board

Our Board has unanimously approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, and determined that it is in the best interests of Magnachip and its stockholders that Magnachip enter into the Merger Agreement and consummate the Merger on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement.

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE (1) “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND APPROVE THE MERGER; (2) “FOR” THE COMPENSATION PROPOSAL; AND (3) “FOR” THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.

Reasons for the Merger

On March 25, 2021, our Board, after careful consideration, unanimously (1) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated thereby, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, (2) determined that it is in the best interests of Magnachip

53

and our stockholders that Magnachip enter into the Merger Agreement and consummate the Merger on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, (3) directed that the adoption of the Merger Agreement be submitted to a vote at a meeting of our stockholders and (4) resolved to recommend to our stockholders that they vote “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger.

In evaluating the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, our Board consulted with, and received the guidance of, Magnachip’s senior management and outside legal and financial advisors, Paul, Weiss, RLF and J.P. Morgan, and, in reaching its determination to approve the terms of the Merger Agreement and the Merger and to recommend, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, that Magnachip’s stockholders vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and the Merger, our Board carefully considered a number of factors that it believed supported its determination and recommendation, which factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

54

55

56

57

Possible Uncertainties, Risks and Negative Factors Associated with the Merger

Our Board also considered a variety of uncertainties, risks and other potentially negative factors relating to the Merger, including the following:

58

59

Our Board, upon consideration of these and other factors the Board deemed relevant and with the advice from its advisors, concluded that the uncertainties, risks and potentially negative factors relevant to the Merger were outweighed by the benefits that our Board expects the Company and its stockholders would achieve as a result of the Merger, and that the Merger is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

This discussion of the information and factors considered by our Board includes the principal positive and negative factors considered by our Board, but is not intended to be exhaustive, is not presented in any specific order of ranking of importance and may not include all of the factors considered by our Board. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the Merger, and the complexity of these matters, our Board did not find it useful and did not attempt to quantify or assign any relative or specific weights to the various factors that it considered in reaching its determination to approve the Merger and to make its recommendations to the Company’s stockholders. Rather, our Board viewed its decisions as being based on the totality of the information presented to it and the factors it considered, including discussions with the Company’s management and outside financial and legal advisors. In addition, individual members of our Board may have held varied views of the relative importance of the factors considered and may have given differing weights to different factors. The explanation of our Board’s reasons for the Merger and all other information in this section may be forward-looking in nature and therefore should be read in light of the factors discussed in the section captioned “Forward-Looking Information” beginning on page 12 of this proxy statement.

The explanations of Magnachip’s reasons for the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, and other information presented in this section is forward-looking in nature and, accordingly, should be read in light of the risks described in the section captioned “Forward-Looking Information” beginning on page 12 of this proxy statement.

Fairness Opinion of J.P. Morgan

Pursuant to an engagement letter, the Company retained J.P. Morgan as its financial advisor in connection with the proposed Merger.

At the meeting of our Board on March 25, 2021, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral opinion to our Board that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock in cash to be paid to the holders of Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders. J.P. Morgan has confirmed its March 25, 2021 oral opinion by delivering its written opinion to our Board, dated March 25, 2021, that, as of such date, the consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock in cash to be paid to the holders of Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders.

The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan dated March 25, 2021, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The summary of the opinion of J.P. Morgan set forth in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. The Company’s stockholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety. J.P. Morgan’s written opinion was addressed to our Board (in its capacity as such) in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the proposed Merger, was directed only to the consideration to be paid to the holders of Company Common Stock in the Merger and did not address any other aspect of the Merger. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the consideration to the holders of any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company or as to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the proposed Merger. The issuance of J.P. Morgan’s opinion was approved by a fairness committee of J.P. Morgan. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of the Company as to how such stockholder should vote with respect to the proposed Merger or any other matter.

60

In arriving at its opinions, J.P. Morgan, among other things:

In addition, J.P. Morgan held discussions with certain members of the management of the Company and representatives of Parent with respect to certain aspects of the Merger, and the past and current business operations of the Company, the financial condition and future prospects and operations of the Company, and certain other matters J.P. Morgan believed necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.

In giving its opinion, J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed with J.P. Morgan by the Company and Parent or otherwise reviewed by or for J.P. Morgan, and J.P. Morgan did not independently verify (and did not assume responsibility or liability for independently verifying) any such information or its accuracy or completeness. J.P. Morgan did not conduct or was not provided with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor did J.P. Morgan evaluate the solvency of the Company or Parent under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In relying on the financial analyses and forecasts provided to J.P. Morgan or derived therefrom, J.P. Morgan assumed that they were reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments by management as to the expected future results of operations and financial condition of the Company to which such analyses and forecasts relate. J.P. Morgan expressed no view as to such analyses or forecasts or the assumptions on which they were based. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement will be consummated as described in the Merger Agreement, and that the definitive Merger Agreement would not differ in any material respect from the draft thereof provided to J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the representations and warranties made by the Company, Parent and Merger Sub in the Merger Agreement and the related agreements were and will be true and correct in all respects material to its analysis. J.P Morgan is not a legal, regulatory or tax expert and relied on the assessments made by advisors to the Company with respect to such issues. J.P. Morgan further assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the Merger will be obtained without any adverse effect on the Company or on the contemplated benefits of the Merger.

The projections furnished to J.P. Morgan were prepared by the Company’s management. The Company does not publicly disclose internal management projections of the type provided to J.P. Morgan in connection with J.P. Morgan’s analysis of the proposed Merger, and such projections were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure. These projections were based on numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and may be beyond the control of the Company’s management, including, without limitation, factors related to industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market, competitive and financial conditions, prevailing interest rates, and other future events, as well as matters specific to the Company’s

61

business. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those set forth in such projections. For more information regarding the use of projections and other forward-looking statements, please refer to the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Forecasts” beginning on page 66 of this proxy statement.

J.P. Morgan’s opinion was necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date of such opinion. J.P. Morgan’s opinion noted that subsequent developments may affect J.P. Morgan’s opinion, and that J.P. Morgan does not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm such opinion. J.P. Morgan’s opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid to the holders of Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger, and J.P. Morgan has expressed no opinion as to the fairness of any consideration to the holders of any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company or the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the Merger. Furthermore, J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers, directors, or employees of any party to the proposed Merger, or any class of such persons relative to the consideration to be paid to the holders of the Company Common Stock in the proposed Merger or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the price at which the Company Common Stock will trade at any future time.

The terms of the Merger Agreement, including the Merger Consideration, were determined through arm’s length negotiations between the Company and Parent, and the decision to enter into the Merger Agreement was solely that of our Board. J.P. Morgan’s opinion and financial analyses were only one of the many factors considered by our Board in its evaluation of the proposed Merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of our Board or the Company’s management with respect to the proposed Merger or the consideration. For more information on some of the factors our Board considered in reaching its determination to approve the terms of the Merger Agreement and the Merger, please see the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Recommendation of Our Board and Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 53 of this proxy statement.

In accordance with customary investment banking practice, J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation methodology in rendering its opinion to our Board on March 25, 2021 and contained in the presentation delivered to our Board on such date in connection with the rendering of such opinion and does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by J.P. Morgan. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables are not intended to stand alone, and in order to more fully understand the financial analyses used by J.P. Morgan, the tables must be read together with the full text of each summary. Considering the data set forth below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of J.P. Morgan’s analyses.

Public Trading Multiples. Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan compared selected financial data of the Company with similar data for selected publicly traded companies in the semiconductor industry engaged in businesses which J.P. Morgan judged to be analogous to the Company. The companies selected by J.P. Morgan were as follows:

62

These companies were selected, among other reasons, because they are publicly traded companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of J.P. Morgan’s analysis, were considered in its judgment sufficiently similar in certain respects to those of the Company based on business sector participation, operational characteristics and financial metrics. However, none of the selected companies reviewed is identical or directly comparable to the Company and certain of these companies may have characteristics that are materially different from those of the Company. The analyses necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operational characteristics of the companies involved and other factors that could affect the companies differently than they would affect the Company.

With respect to the selected companies, the information J.P. Morgan presented included the multiple of firm value to the Wall Street research analyst consensus estimates of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) of the applicable selected company for calendar year 2021 (“CY2021E FV/EBITDA”). This analysis indicated the following CY2021E FV/EBITDA multiple:

Based on the results of the above analysis and on other factors J.P. Morgan considered appropriate, J.P. Morgan selected a CY2021E FV/EBITDA reference range for the Company of 6.0x to 13.0x. J.P. Morgan then applied that range to the estimate of the Company’s EBITDA for 2021 included in the Forecasts provided by Company management and described in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Forecasts” beginning on page 66 of this proxy statement. This analysis indicated a range of implied equity values per share for Company Common Stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25, of $13.50 to $22.25, which J.P. Morgan compared to the Merger Consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. J.P. Morgan conducted a discounted cash flow analysis for the purpose of determining the fully diluted equity value per share for the Company Common Stock.

A discounted cash flow analysis is a method of evaluating an asset using estimates of the future unlevered free cash flows generated by the asset, and taking into consideration the time value of money with respect to those future cash flows by calculating their “present value.” The “unlevered free cash flows” refers to a calculation of the future cash flows generated by an asset without including in such calculation any debt servicing costs. “Present value” refers to the current value of the future cash flows generated by the asset, and is obtained by discounting those cash flows back to the present using a discount rate that takes into account macroeconomic assumptions and estimates of risk, the opportunity cost of capital and other appropriate factors. “Terminal value” refers to the present value of all future cash flows estimated to be generated by the asset for periods beyond the projections period.

J.P. Morgan calculated the unlevered free cash flows that the Company is expected to generate from March 1, 2021 through the remainder of calendar year 2021 and during calendar years 2022 through 2030 based upon the financial projections prepared by Company management. J.P. Morgan also calculated a range of terminal asset values of the Company at the end of this period by applying a perpetual growth rate ranging from 2.0% to 3.0% of the unlevered free cash flows of the Company during the final year of such period. The unlevered free cash flows and the range of terminal asset values were then discounted to present values using a range of discount rates from 9.50% to 11.50%, which were chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the

63

weighted average cost of capital of the Company, taking into account macroeconomic assumptions and estimates of risk, the opportunity cost of capital and other factors J.P. Morgan deemed appropriate. These present values, when added together, resulted in an implied firm value for the Company. To calculate an estimated equity value per share of Company Common Stock, J.P. Morgan then adjusted the implied firm value for the Company’s debt and cash, and divided the result by the fully diluted number of the shares of Company Common Stock outstanding.

Based on the foregoing, the discounted cash flow analysis indicated a range of equity values per share for Company Common Stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25, of between $20.00 and $26.25, which J.P. Morgan compared to the Merger Consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock.

Selected Transaction Multiples Analysis. Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan examined selected transactions with respect to which J.P. Morgan judged to be analogous to the Company’s business or aspects thereof based on J.P. Morgan’s experience and familiarity with the industries in which the Company operates. These transactions were selected by J.P. Morgan as relevant in evaluating the proposed Merger. Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan calculated, for each selected transaction, the multiple of the target company’s firm value implied in the relevant transaction to the target company’s estimated EBITDA for the next 12 months following announcement of each applicable transaction (“FV/NTM EBITDA”). Results of this analysis were presented for the selected transactions, as indicated in the following table:

None of the selected transactions reviewed was identical to the proposed Merger. Certain of these transactions may have characteristics that are materially different from those of the proposed Merger. However, the transactions selected were chosen because the participants in and certain other aspects of the transactions, for purposes of J.P. Morgan’s analysis, may be considered similar to the participants in and aspects of the Merger. The analyses necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operational characteristics of the companies involved and other factors that could affect the transactions differently than they would affect the Merger.

Based on the results of this analysis and other factors that J.P. Morgan considered appropriate, J.P. Morgan selected a FV/NTM EBITDA reference range for the Company of 9.5x to 14.0x. J.P. Morgan then applied that range to the Company estimated fiscal year 2021 EBITDA included in the Forecasts provided by Company management and described in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Forecasts” beginning on page 66 of this proxy statement. This analysis indicated a range of implied equity values per share for Company Common Stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25, of $18.00 to $23.75, which J.P. Morgan compared to the Merger Consideration of $29.00 per share of Company Common Stock.

64

Historical Trading Range for the Company. For reference purposes only and not as a component of its fairness analysis, J.P. Morgan reviewed the historical prices of the shares of Company Common Stock during the 52-week period prior to March 3, 2021 (the date that speculation regarding a Company acquisition became public), noting that the low and high closing prices during such period ranged from $7.03 per share of Company Common Stock to $20.14 per share of Company Common Stock.

Analyst Price Targets for the Company. For reference purposes only and not as a component of its fairness analysis, J.P. Morgan reviewed certain publicly available equity research analyst share price targets for the Company Common Stock, discounted to present values, using a discount rate of 10.75%, noting that these present values of share price targets for the Company Common Stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25, ranged from $22.50 per share of Company Common Stock to $27.00 per share of Company Common Stock.

Miscellaneous. The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by J.P. Morgan. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. J.P. Morgan believes that the foregoing summary and its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses, without considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying the analyses and its opinion. As a result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis or combination of analyses described above were merely utilized to create points of reference for analytical purposes and should not be taken to be the view of J.P. Morgan with respect to the actual value of the Company. The order of analyses described does not represent the relative importance or weight given to those analyses by J.P. Morgan. In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan did not attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any individual analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered in isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion. Rather, J.P. Morgan considered the totality of the factors and analyses performed in determining its opinion.

Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain, as they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly, forecasts and analyses used or made by J.P. Morgan are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those analyses. Moreover, J.P. Morgan’s analyses are not and do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the prices at which businesses actually could be acquired or sold. None of the selected companies reviewed as described in the above summary is identical to the Company, and none of the selected transactions reviewed was identical to the Merger. However, the companies selected were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of J.P. Morgan’s analysis, may be considered similar to those of the Company. The transactions selected were similarly chosen because their participants, size and other factors, for purposes of J.P. Morgan’s analysis, may be considered similar to the Merger. The analyses necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operational characteristics of the companies involved and other factors that could affect the companies compared to the Company and the transactions compared to the Merger.

As a part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was selected to advise the Company with respect to the Merger on the basis of, among other things, such experience and its qualifications and reputation in connection with such matters and its familiarity with the Company and the industries in which it operates.

For services rendered in connection with the Merger and the delivery of its opinion, the Company has agreed to pay J.P. Morgan a fee of up to $30 million, of which $5 million became payable to J.P. Morgan upon delivery of its opinion, and the remainder will become payable to J.P. Morgan upon the consummation of the

65

proposed Merger. In addition, the Company has agreed to reimburse J.P. Morgan for certain of its expenses incurred in connection with its services, including the fees and disbursements of counsel, and will indemnify J.P. Morgan against certain liabilities arising out of J.P. Morgan’s engagement. During the two years preceding the date of J.P. Morgan’s opinion, neither J.P. Morgan nor any its affiliates have had any material financial advisory or material commercial or investment banking relationships with Parent. During the two years preceding the date of J.P. Morgan’s opinion, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have had, and continue to have, commercial or investment banking relationships with the Company for which J.P. Morgan and such affiliates have received, or will receive, customary compensation. Such services during such period have included acting as financial advisor on the Company’s divestiture which closed in September 2020. In addition, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates hold, on a proprietary basis, less than 1% of the outstanding Company Common Stock. During the two-year period preceding delivery of its opinion ending on February 28, 2021, the aggregate fees recognized by J.P. Morgan from the Company were approximately $11 million. In the ordinary course of their businesses, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates may actively trade the debt and equity securities or financial instruments (including derivatives, bank loans or other obligations) of the Company for J.P. Morgan’s account or for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, J.P. Morgan may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities or other financial instruments.

Forecasts

Magnachip does not as a matter of course make public projections as to future revenues, operating income or other results beyond the fiscal year. Prospective financial information about Magnachip (the “Forecasts”) is included in this proxy statement only because (1) a portion of the Forecasts were made available to Wise Road and other interested parties in connection with the due diligence review of Magnachip; (2) the Forecasts were made available to J.P. Morgan for use in connection with its financial analysis and the Opinion as described in the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Fairness Opinion of J.P. Morgan” beginning on page 60 of this proxy statement and (3) the Forecasts were made available to our Board in connection with Magnachip’s exploration and evaluation of strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value, including a sale of Magnachip. The Forecasts were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure and are not included in this proxy statement to influence any stockholder to make any investment decision with respect to the Merger, including whether or not to seek appraisal rights with respect to the shares of Company Common Stock.

Although the Forecasts are presented with numerical specificity, they reflect numerous estimates and assumptions made by Magnachip with respect to industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market, competitive and financial conditions, prevailing interest rates, and other future events, as well as matters specific to Magnachip’s business, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond Magnachip’s control. The Forecasts reflect assumptions as to certain potential business decisions that are subject to change. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Forecasts include assumptions relating to revenues generated by Magnachip’s business lines and transitional foundry revenue, profitability, capital expenditures, net working capital, tax rates, foreign exchange rates, labor costs and other fixed and variable operating expenses, equity-based compensation expenses and depreciation and amortization. The Forecasts cover several years and such information by its nature becomes less reliable with each successive year.

In the view of Magnachip’s management, the information in the Forecasts was reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting best currently available estimates and judgments by management as to the expected future results of operations and financial conditions of Magnachip as of the date such information was prepared. In addition, the Forecasts did not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date they were prepared, including the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or the announcement thereof. Further, these Forecasts did not take into account the effect of any failure of the Merger to occur, and should not be viewed as applicable or continuing in that context. However, this information is not fact and should not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future results. The Forecasts reflect subjective judgment in many respects and thus are susceptible to multiple interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and

66

business developments. As such, the Forecasts constitute forward-looking information and are subject to many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results forecasted in the Forecasts, including, but not limited to, the impact of changes in macroeconomic and/or general economic conditions, including those caused by or related to the COVID-19 outbreak, recessions, economic instability and the outbreak of disease; the impact of competitive products and pricing; timely design acceptance by our customers; timely introduction of new products and technologies; ability to ramp new products into volume production; industry wide shifts in supply and demand for semiconductor products; industry and/or company overcapacity; effective and cost efficient utilization of manufacturing capacity; financial stability in foreign markets and the impact of foreign exchange rates; unanticipated costs and expenses or the inability to identify expenses which can be eliminated; compliance with U.S. and international trade and export laws and regulations by us and our distributors; change or ratification of local or international laws and regulations, including those related to environment, health and safety; public health issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic; other business interruptions that could disrupt supply or delivery of, or demand for, Magnachip’s products, including uncertainties regarding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic that may result in factory closures, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and goods produced in infected areas, as well as reduced consumer and business spending affecting demand for Magnachip’s products due to government and private sector mandatory business closures, travel restrictions or the like to prevent the spread of disease; and other risks detailed from time to time in Magnachip’s filings with the SEC, including our Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2021 (including that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, trade tensions and supply constraints may also exacerbate the risks discussed therein). There can be no assurance that the Forecasts will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower than forecast. In addition, the Forecasts will be affected by Magnachip’s ability to achieve strategic goals, objectives and targets over the applicable periods. The Forecasts cannot, therefore, be considered a guarantee of future operating results, and this information should not be relied on as such.

The inclusion of the Forecasts should not be regarded as an indication that Magnachip and J.P. Morgan or anyone who received this information then considered, or now considers, them a reliable prediction of future events, and this information should not be relied upon as such. The inclusion of the Forecasts herein should not be deemed an admission or representation by Magnachip that Magnachip views such Forecasts as material information. The inclusion of the Forecasts in this proxy statement should not be regarded as an indication that the Forecasts will be necessarily predictive of actual future events given the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with such long-range forecasts. No representation is made by Magnachip or any other person regarding the Forecasts or Magnachip’s ultimate performance compared to such information. The Forecasts should be evaluated, if at all, in conjunction with the historical financial statements and other information about us contained in Magnachip’s public filings with the SEC. See the section captioned “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 129 of this proxy statement for more information. In light of the foregoing factors, and the uncertainties inherent in the Forecasts, stockholders are cautioned not to place undue, if any, reliance on the Forecasts.

The Forecasts included in this document have been prepared or approved for use by Magnachip’s management or, as indicated below, have been calculated by J.P. Morgan using the Forecasts and certain prospective financial information provided by Magnachip’s management, in each case, approved for J.P. Morgan’s use by Magnachip. Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers has not audited, reviewed, examined, compiled nor applied agreed-upon procedures with respect to the accompanying Forecasts and, accordingly, Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers report incorporated by reference in this proxy statement relates to Magnachip’s previously issued financial statements. It does not extend to the Forecasts and should not be read to do so.

The Forecasts are “non-GAAP financial measures,” which are financial performance measures that are not calculated in accordance with the published guidelines of the SEC regarding Forecasts or accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial measures should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP financial measures, and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. Furthermore, there are limitations inherent in non-GAAP financial measures, because they

67

exclude charges and credits that are required to be included in a GAAP presentation. Accordingly, these non-GAAP financial measures should be considered together with, and not as an alternative to, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The Forecasts were not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation or presentation of prospective financial information.

The following table presents selected unaudited prospective financial data from the Forecasts:

Further, the Forecasts also include the following extrapolations from the above referenced Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and Unlevered Free Cash Flow amounts that J.P. Morgan used, with Magnachip’s approval, in connection with its financial analysis and the Opinion (and there were no other extrapolations of such financial measures prepared separately by Magnachip’s management for use by J.P. Morgan in connection therewith):

In addition, the Forecasts have not been updated or revised to reflect information or results after the date they were prepared or as of the date of this proxy statement, and except as required by applicable securities laws, MAGNACHIP DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE FORECASTS OR THE SPECIFIC PORTIONS PRESENTED TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS ARE SHOWN TO BE IN ERROR.

68

Interests of Our Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

When considering the recommendation of our Board that you vote to approve the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger, you should be aware that our directors and executive officers (as defined under U.S. federal securities laws) have interests in the Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally, as more fully described below. Our Board was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in approving the Merger Agreement and the Merger and recommending that the Merger Agreement be adopted and the Merger be approved by our stockholders. The transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement will be a “change in control” for purposes of our executive compensation and benefit plans and agreements described below.

Treatment of Magnachip Equity Awards

Our non-employee directors and executive officers hold various types of compensatory awards with respect to Company Common Stock. Our non-employee directors hold awards of options to acquire shares of Company Common Stock (“Company Options”) and Company RSUs (as defined below) and our executive officers hold awards of Company Options, Company RSUs and Company PSUs (as defined below). As a result of the Merger, the treatment of the Company Options, Company RSUs and Company PSUs that are outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and held by our non-employee directors and executive officers will be as follows:

Treatment of Company Options

Magnachip will use reasonable best efforts so that, as of the Effective Time, each Company Option granted under Magnachip’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2020 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Company Equity Plans”) outstanding immediately before the Effective Time, whether or not then exercisable or vested, by virtue of the Merger and without any further action by Parent, Merger Sub, Magnachip or the holder of that Company Option, will be canceled and converted into the right to receive from Parent or the Surviving Corporation an amount in cash, without interest, equal to (1) the excess, if any, of the Merger Consideration over the per share exercise or purchase price of the applicable Company Option multiplied by (2) the aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock underlying such Company Option immediately before the Effective Time. If the per share exercise price or purchase price of any Company Option is greater than or equal to the Merger Consideration, such Company Option will be cancelled and terminated as of the Effective Time without any cash payment being made or other consideration provided in respect thereof. Magnachip has not granted any Company Options to its employees or non-employee directors since 2017, and all of the outstanding Company Options are currently fully vested and exercisable.

Treatment of Company RSUs

Magnachip will use reasonable best efforts so that, as of the Effective Time, each restricted stock unit that is subject to vesting or other risks of forfeiture (other than Company PSUs (as defined below)) granted under the Company Equity Plans (“Company RSUs”) outstanding immediately before the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action by Parent, Merger Sub, Magnachip or the holder of such Company RSU, shall be vested and all restrictions thereon shall lapse in full as of immediately before the Effective Time, and each such vested Company RSU will be canceled and converted into the right to receive from Parent (or the Surviving Corporation) an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the Merger Consideration multiplied by the number of shares of Company Common Stock that such Company RSU conveyed the right to receive.

Treatment of Company PSUs

Magnachip will use reasonable best efforts so that, as of the Effective Time, each performance-based restricted stock unit granted under the Company Equity Plans (“Company PSUs”) outstanding immediately before the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action by Parent, Merger Sub, the Company

69

or the holder of such Company PSU, shall be vested and all restrictions thereon shall lapse in full and the number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to such Company PSU earned or deemed earned based on performance measures that shall be equal to the maximum amount of such award as of immediately before the Effective Time, and each such vested Company PSU will be canceled and converted into the right to receive from Parent (or the Surviving Corporation) an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the Merger Consideration multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock that such Company PSU conveyed the right to receive.

Payments with Respect to Equity Awards

As promptly as practicable following the Effective Time, Parent will cause the Paying Agent (as defined in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Payment Procedures” beginning on page 94 of this proxy statement) to pay the aggregate amounts described above that are payable with respect to each Company Option, Company RSU and Company PSU (collectively, the “Company Equity Awards”) to the Surviving Corporation, and promptly thereafter (in any event not later than the third business day after the Effective Time), Parent will cause the Surviving Corporation to pay the applicable amount payable to each holder of a Company Equity Award through its payroll system, subject to reduction by any income or employment tax withholding required under the Code or any applicable state, local or foreign tax law.

Equity Awards Held by Executive Officers

Assuming that the Effective Time is May 6, 2021, the estimated aggregate value of vested Company Options held by our named executive officers is $9,697,301 and the estimated aggregate value of unvested Company RSUs and Company PSUs, including performance awards assessed at maximum, held by such named executive officers is $15,773,999. For an estimate of the amounts that may be paid or become payable to each of our named executive officers with respect to unvested equity awards in connection with the Merger, see the section captioned “Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger Agreement and Approval of the Merger—Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to our Named Executive Officers” beginning on page 74 of this proxy statement. The foregoing amounts have been determined using the per share Merger Consideration of $29.00.

Equity Awards Held by Non-Employee Directors

Assuming that the Effective Time is May 6, 2021, the estimated aggregate value of vested Company Options held by the non-employee directors is $11,541,819 and the estimated aggregate amounts that would become payable to the non-employee directors in respect of their outstanding Company RSUs is $11,112,278. The foregoing amounts have been determined using the per share Merger Consideration of $29.00 and includes the Company Options and Company RSUs held by Nader Tavakoli, who resigned as a director effective as of April 22, 2021.

Agreements or Arrangements with our Executive Officers

As described in more detail below, each of our executive officers, is party to an employment agreement or executive services agreement with the Company which provides severance or other benefits upon a change in control. In addition, in connection with the consummation of the Merger, we have allocated a transaction bonus pool of approximately $2,460,000 to be awarded, in the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion, to certain key executives and employees as bonuses to encourage retention and motivate our executives and employees to successfully complete the Merger and commence post-merger integration.

Employment Agreement with Young-Joon Kim

On April 26, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Young-Joon Kim, pursuant to which Mr. YJ Kim is entitled to severance payments and benefits upon certain qualifying terminations of his employment in connection with a change in control.

70

If Mr. YJ Kim’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (1) during (i) a period the Company is party to a definitive agreement for a corporate transaction, the consummation of which would result in a change in control or (ii) the 18-month period following a change in control (each, a “CIC Termination”), or (2) by reason of his death or disability, he is entitled to receive (A) a lump sum payment equal to two times the sum of his base salary (as then in effect or in effect prior to any diminution implicating “good reason”) and his annual bonus (as then in effect or in effect prior to any diminution implicating “good reason,” but in no event greater than 100% of his base salary), (B) a prorated portion of his annual bonus based on actual performance (if such termination occurs after June 30 of the year of termination), (C) a lump sum payment equal to the cost of 18 months of Company-paid COBRA premiums, (D) 90 days’ continuation of his expatriate benefits and, to the extent that he is eligible to receive such payments as part of the expatriate benefits, repatriation allowance and expenses and (E) accelerated vesting of outstanding equity or equity-based awards granted to Mr. YJ Kim on or after January 1, 2018, in accordance with the terms of the equity plan and the applicable award agreements.

Mr. YJ Kim’s right to receive any of the severance payments outlined above is subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, including: (1) a 24-month non-compete; (2) a 24-month non-solicit of employees and customers; (3) a 24-month no-hire of employees; (4) perpetual non-disclosure; and (5) perpetual non-disparagement.

Mr. YJ Kim’s employment agreement includes a Section 280G cutback provision, pursuant to which, in the event any payments or benefits received by Mr. YJ Kim would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, he will receive the greater of (1) such payments reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any portion of the payments from being nondeductible or (2) the full amount of such payments. The employment agreement also includes a tax equalization provision, pursuant to which we will pay Mr. YJ Kim an amount equal to the amount necessary to put him in the same after-tax position he would be in if he was only subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax. The tax equalization provision does not entitle Mr. YJ Kim to any reimbursement of excise taxes that may be incurred under Sections 4999 or 409A of the Code.

Employment Agreement with Young Soo Woo

On May 26, 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Young Soo Woo, pursuant to which Mr. YS Woo is entitled to the following severance payments and benefits upon a CIC Termination: (1) 12 months of continued base salary (as then in effect or in effect prior to any diminution constituting “good reason”), (2) a prorated portion of his annual bonus based on actual performance (if such termination occurs after June 30 of the year of termination) and (3) accelerated vesting of outstanding equity or equity-based awards, in accordance with the terms of the equity plan and the applicable award agreements.

Mr. YS Woo’s right to receive any of the severance payments outlined above is subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, including: (1) a 12-month non-compete; (2) a 12-month non-solicit of employees and customers; (3) a 12-month no-hire of employees; (4) perpetual non-disclosure; and (5) perpetual non-disparagement.

Mr. YS Woo’s employment agreement includes a Section 280G cutback provision pursuant to which, in the event any payments or benefits received by Mr. YS Woo would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, he will receive the greater of (1) such payments reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any portion of the payments from being nondeductible or (2) the full amount of such payments.

Employment Agreement with Theodore Kim

On October 22, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Theodore Kim, pursuant to which Mr. T. Kim is entitled to the following severance payments and benefits upon a CIC Termination: (1) a lump sum payment equal to the sum of (i) one and one half times his base salary (as then in effect or in effect prior to any

71

diminution implicating “good reason”) and (ii) if the termination occurs on or after July 1 of the calendar year of termination, an amount equal to one months’ base salary multiplied by the number of whole or partial months between July 1 and the date of termination (rounding up for any partial month), (2) a prorated portion of his annual bonus based on actual performance (if such termination occurs after June 30 of the year of termination), (3) a lump sum payment equal to the cost of 12 months of Company-paid COBRA premiums, (4) 90 days’ continuation of his expatriate benefits and, to the extent that he is eligible to receive such payments as part of the expatriate benefits, repatriation allowance and expenses and (5) accelerated vesting of outstanding equity or equity-based awards granted to Mr. T. Kim on or after January 1, 2018, in accordance with the terms of the equity plan and the applicable award agreements.

Mr. T. Kim’s right to receive any of the severance payments outlined above is subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, including: (1) a 12-month non-compete; (2) a 12-month non-solicit of employees and customers; (3) a 12-month no-hire of employees; (4) perpetual non-disclosure; and (5) perpetual non-disparagement.

Mr. T. Kim’s employment agreement includes a Section 280G cutback provision, pursuant to which, in the event any payments or benefits received by Mr. T. Kim would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, he will receive the greater of (1) such payments reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any portion of the payments from being nondeductible or (2) the full amount of such payments. The employment agreement also includes a tax equalization provision, pursuant to which we will pay Mr. T. Kim an amount equal to the amount necessary to put him in the same after-tax position he would be in if he was only subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax. The tax equalization provision does not entitle Mr. T. Kim to any reimbursement of excise taxes that may be incurred under Sections 4999 or 409A of the Code.

Employment Agreement with Woung Moo Lee

On October 22, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Woung Moo Lee, pursuant to which Mr. WM Lee is entitled to the following severance payments and benefits upon a CIC Termination: (1) an amount equal to one and one half times his base salary (as then in effect or in effect prior to any diminution implicating “good reason”) paid over a 12-month period, (2) a prorated portion of his annual bonus based on actual performance (if such termination occurs after June 30 of the year of termination) and (3) accelerated vesting of outstanding equity or equity-based awards granted to Mr. WM Lee on or after January 1, 2018, in accordance with the terms of the equity plan and the applicable award agreements.

Mr. WM Lee’s right to receive any of the severance payments outlined above is subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, including: (1) a 12-month non-compete; (2) a 12-month non-solicit of employees and customers; (3) a 12-month no-hire of employees; (4) perpetual non-disclosure; and (5) perpetual non-disparagement.

Mr. WM Lee’s employment agreement includes a Section 280G cutback provision, pursuant to which, in the event any payments or benefits received by Mr. WM Lee would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, he will receive the greater of (1) such payments reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any portion of the payments from being nondeductible or (2) the full amount of such payments.

Executive Service Agreement with Chan Ho Park

On June 1, 2020, we entered into an executive service agreement with Chan Ho Park, pursuant to which Mr. C. Park is entitled to the following severance payments and benefits upon a CIC Termination: (1) 12 months of continued base salary (as then in effect or in effect prior to any diminution constituting “good reason”), (2) a portion of his annual bonus based on actual performance (if such termination occurs after June 30 of the year of termination) and (3) vesting in all outstanding equity grants in accordance with the terms of the equity plan and the applicable award agreements.

72

Mr. C. Park’s right to receive any of the severance payments outlined above is subject to his execution and non-revocation of a release of claims against us and compliance with certain restrictive covenants, including: (1) a 12-month non-compete; (2) a 12-month non-solicit of employees and customers; (3) a 12-month no-hire of employees; (4) perpetual non-disclosure; and (5) perpetual non-disparagement.

Mr. C. Park’s executive service agreement includes a cutback provision, pursuant to which, in the event any payments or benefits received by Mr. C. Park would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, he will receive the greater of (1) such payments reduced by an amount necessary to prevent any portion of the payments from being nondeductible or (2) the full amount of such payments.

For purposes of the agreements with Messrs. YJ Kim, YS Woo, T. Kim, WM Lee and C. Park, “cause” generally means: (1) the executive’s conviction of, or a plea of nolo contendere to, a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude (or, in each case, equivalent crimes in a jurisdiction other than the United States), but excluding minor traffic violations; (2) the executive’s commission of fraud, embezzlement or misappropriation of funds; (3) a breach by the executive of the executive’s fiduciary duty; (4) the executive’s refusal to fulfill the executive’s duties and responsibilities (other than by reason of death or disability); (5) the executive’s material violation of any established lawful company policy; (6) the executive’s material breach of any of the terms of any agreement between us and the executive; (7) the executive’s habitual use of illicit drugs or habitual abuse of alcohol that affects the executive’s job performance; or (8) any gross negligence, material misconduct or material wrongful act or omission on the executive’s part in connection with the executive’s duties and responsibilities, in each case subject to certain notice and cure provisions.

For purposes of the agreements with Messrs. YJ Kim, YS Woo, T. Kim, WM Lee and C. Park “good reason” generally means: (1) if upon or following a change in control, a diminution in the executive’s base salary or target annual bonus opportunity; (2) if prior to a change in control, a diminution in (i) the executive’s base salary, other than an across the board cumulative reduction of no more than 15% that applies in a similar manner to all of our other similarly situated members of the senior management or (ii) the executive’s target annual bonus opportunity (other than a reduction that occurs as a result of a reduction described in the foregoing clause (i)); (3) our material breach of any of the material terms of any material agreement between us and the executive; or (4) a non-temporary relocation of the executive’s primary work location by us to a location that is more than 35 miles from the executive’s principal place of service and that increases the executive’s one-way commute to work by more than 35 miles, in each case, subject to certain notice and cure provisions.

Transaction Bonus Pool for Executive Officers

In connection with the consummation of the Merger, we have allocated a transaction bonus pool of approximately $2,460,000 to be awarded, in the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion, to certain key executives and employees as bonuses to encourage retention and motivate our executives and employees to successfully complete the Merger and commence post-merger integration. In connection with such transaction bonus pool, the Compensation Committee approved the following awards for (i) Mr. YS Woo, approximately $79,000; (ii) Mr. T. Kim, approximately $529,000; (iii) Mr. WM Lee, approximately $185,000; and Mr. C. Park, approximately $132,000. Mr. YJ Kim has elected to forego participation in the transaction bonus pool to allow for a larger percentage of the transaction bonus pool to be allocated to other executives.

Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance

The Merger Agreement provides that for a period of at least six years from and after the Effective Time (or for a longer period if set forth in any indemnification agreement in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement), Parent and the Surviving Corporation will cause all rights to indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation now existing in favor of any Indemnified Parties (as defined under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance” beginning on page 107 of this proxy statement) as provided in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and comparable

73

organizational or governing documents of our subsidiaries (as in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement) or in any written indemnification agreements (in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement) between an Indemnified Party and Magnachip or one of our subsidiaries, to survive the Merger and to continue in full force and effect.

Parent has also agreed to cause the Surviving Corporation to indemnify and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law with respect to all acts and omissions arising out of or relating to their services as directors, officers or employees of Magnachip, our subsidiaries or another person, if such Indemnified Party is or was serving as a director, officer or employee of such other person at the request of Magnachip, or fiduciaries of the Company Benefit Plans (as defined in the Merger Agreement), whether asserted or claimed at or after or occurring before the Effective Time (including in connection with the negotiation and execution of the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or otherwise). If any Indemnified Party is or becomes involved in any legal action in connection with any matter subject to indemnification hereunder, then Parent has agreed to cause the Surviving Corporation to advance as incurred any Damages arising out of or incurred in connection with such legal action, subject to the Surviving Corporation’s receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such Indemnified Party to repay such Damages if it is ultimately determined under applicable law that such Indemnified Party is not entitled to be indemnified.

The Merger Agreement also provides that Parent and the Surviving Corporation will, jointly and severally, maintain in effect for at least six years after the Effective Time the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance maintained by Magnachip or policies of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions which are no less advantageous with respect to claims arising out of or relating to events which occurred before or at the Effective Time (including in connection with the negotiation and execution of the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement) so long as Parent and the Surviving Corporation are not required to pay an annual premium in excess of the Maximum Premium (as defined under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement— Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance” beginning on page 107 of this proxy statement). If Parent or the Surviving Corporation are unable to obtain the insurance described in the prior sentence for an amount less than or equal to the Maximum Premium, then Parent and the Surviving Corporation will, jointly and severally, instead obtain as much comparable insurance as possible for an annual premium less than or equal to the Maximum Premium. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of the arrangements contemplated by this paragraph, before the Effective Time, Magnachip will be entitled to purchase (for no more than the Maximum Premium) a “tail” directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy covering the matters described in this paragraph and, if Magnachip elects to purchase such a policy before the Effective Time, then Parent and the Surviving Corporation’s obligations under this paragraph will be satisfied so long as Parent and the Surviving Corporation cause such policy to be maintained in effect for a period of six years following the Effective Time.

Quantification of Potential Payments and Benefits to Our Named Executive Officers

In accordance with Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K, the table below sets forth the amount of payments and benefits that each of our named executive officers would or may receive in connection with the Merger. The amounts reported below are based on various assumptions that may or may not actually occur or be accurate on the relevant date, including assumptions described in the footnotes to the table. For example, we have assumed, among other things, that: (1) the Effective Time is May 6, 2021, which is the assumed date of the closing solely for the purposes of disclosure in this section; (2) the Company PSUs vest based on maximum achievement in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement; (3) the employment of each of our named executive officers is terminated by us without “cause” or due to the named executive officer’s resignation for “good reason” (each, a “qualifying termination”) in either case, immediately following the assumed Effective Time of May 6, 2021; (4) that the number of equity awards held by each named executive officer on May 6, 2021 is the same as the number of equity awards that will be held by each such named executive officer at the Effective Time, such that the equity values in the table below do not take into account any vesting or forfeitures that may occur between

74

May 6, 2021 and the Effective Time; and (5) no reductions of any payments or benefits would be triggered pursuant to any excise tax provisions in any named executive officer’s applicable agreement.

The actual amounts payable to our named executive officers will depend on whether the named executive officer experiences a qualifying termination, the date of termination (if any) and the terms of the plans or agreements in effect at such time, and accordingly may differ materially from the amounts set forth below. The amounts payable to our named executive officers absent a qualifying termination are solely those described below as equity award payments and the transaction bonus.

For purposes of this discussion, “single trigger” refers to benefits that arise solely as a result of the closing and “double trigger” refers to benefits that arise as a result of the closing accompanied by a qualifying termination on or following the closing.

In addition, Messrs. YS Woo, T. Kim, WM Lee and C. Park are eligible to earn a one-time transaction bonus in connection with the consummation of the Merger.

75

76

Financing of the Merger

Parent has delivered to the Company (1) an executed equity commitment letter (the “Equity Commitment Letter”), pursuant to which North Dearborn Limited, an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability (the “Sponsor”) has committed to provide Parent with equity financing in the amount set forth therein for the purpose of funding the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Equity Financing”), and to which Magnachip is a party and pursuant to which Magnachip can cause Parent to draw down the full proceeds of the Equity Financing from the Sponsor and (2) executed equity commitment letters pursuant to which the direct or indirect investors in Sponsor (such persons, in such capacity, collectively, the “Investors”) have committed to provide Sponsor, directly or indirectly, with equity financing in the amount set forth therein (each an “Investor Commitment Letter” and collectively the “Investor Commitment Letters”) and to which Magnachip is a third-party beneficiary and, subject to the terms thereof, can cause Sponsor to draw down the full proceeds of the investor commitment under such Investor Commitment Letter.

Parent and Merger Sub have agreed to obtain the Equity Financing at or prior to the closing on the terms and conditions described in the Equity Commitment Letter, including by (1) complying with its obligations under the Equity Commitment Letter and (2) if the conditions to closing of the Merger are satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived, consummating the Equity Financing at or prior to the closing date (it being understood that it is not a condition to closing under the Merger Agreement, nor to the consummation of the Merger, for Parent or Merger Sub to obtain the Equity Financing or any alternative financing). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the immediately preceding sentence, but subject to Parent’s and Merger Sub’s ability to obtain alternative financing as contemplated by the penultimate sentence of this paragraph, each of Parent and Merger Sub have agreed to, and will cause each of its affiliates to, take all actions necessary to (i) maintain in effect the Equity Commitment Letter and Investor Commitment Letters and (ii) enforce all of its rights under the Equity Commitment Letter and Investor Commitment Letters (or any definitive agreements relating thereto) (including, if Parent and Merger Sub’s efforts to obtain alternative financing in accordance with this paragraph are unsuccessful, by commencing and pursuing litigation against any of the parties thereto). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Merger Agreement, Sponsor and Parent may supplement, modify or replace the Equity Commitment Letter and Investor Commitment Letters to add investors, limited partners and other similar financing sources who have not executed the Equity Commitment Letter or an Investor Commitment Letter as of the date of the Merger Agreement, provided that such supplement, amendment, modification or replacement does not impose new or additional conditions or otherwise expand, amend or modify any of the conditions to the receipt of Equity Financing in a manner that would reasonably be expected to (A) delay or prevent the funding of the Equity Financing (or satisfaction of the conditions to the Equity Financing) on the closing date or (B) materially and adversely impact the ability of Sponsor or Parent to enforce its rights against other parties to the Equity Commitment Letter or Investor Commitment Letters or the definitive agreements, if any, with respect thereto or consummate the transactions contemplated thereby; provided, however, that, to the extent any such supplement, amendment, modification or replacement would reduce the commitment amount of any Investor or Sponsor under the applicable Investor Commitment Letter or the Equity Commitment Letter as of the date of the Merger Agreement, such original Investor or Sponsor will remain obligated to fund the full amount of its original commitment amount and will otherwise not be relieved of its obligations thereunder. For purposes of this proxy statement, references to the “Equity Financing” will include the financing contemplated by the Equity Commitment Letter as permitted to be supplemented, amended, modified or replaced pursuant to this paragraph, references to an “Investor Commitment Letter” will include such Investor Commitment Letter as permitted to be supplemented, amended, modified or replaced pursuant to this

77

paragraph, and references to the “Equity Commitment Letter” shall include the Equity Commitment Letter as permitted to be supplemented, amended, modified or replaced pursuant to this paragraph.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Merger Agreement, Parent has agreed not to, and will cause Sponsor not to, use Equity Financing that may delay or prevent the funding of the Equity Financing (or satisfaction of the conditions to the Equity Financing) on the closing date.

Parent has represented that the net proceeds from the Equity Financing, in addition to the proceeds of any U.S. dollar debt financing actually received by Parent prior to the closing date, will be sufficient to pay in cash all amounts to be paid by Parent and Merger Sub in connection with the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the aggregate Merger Consideration on the terms and conditions contained in the Merger Agreement, plus Parent’s and Merger Sub’s costs and expenses, and there is not, nor will there be, any restriction on the use of such proceeds for such purposes. The obtaining of debt financing is not a condition to the closing of the Merger, however, prior to the Effective Time, Magnachip has agreed to, and will cause each of our subsidiaries to, and will use our reasonable best efforts to cause our respective representatives to, furnish Parent and its sources of debt financing (the “Financing Sources”) with all information reasonably necessary for Parent to obtain debt financing on customary terms, and otherwise provide to Parent all cooperation reasonably requested by Parent in connection with obtaining debt financing, including by using reasonable best efforts to take certain actions as set forth in the Merger Agreement, but subject to certain restrictions as set forth in the Merger Agreement. Parent has agreed to (1) promptly upon request by Magnachip, reimburse us and our subsidiaries for all reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by us or any of our subsidiaries in connection with such cooperation and (2) promptly indemnify and hold harmless Magnachip and our subsidiaries and our respective representatives from and against any and all liabilities, claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, interest, awards, judgments and penalties (including reasonable and documented attorneys’ fees) actually suffered or incurred by us in connection with the arrangement or consummation of the debt financing, except to the extent any such liabilities, claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, interest, awards, judgments or penalties arise out of or result from fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence by any of Magnachip, our subsidiaries or our respective representatives, as determined by a final, non-appealable judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction.

Closing and Effective Time

The closing of the Merger will take place on the tenth business day after the day on which all of the conditions to closing of the Merger (as described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger” beginning on page 108 of this proxy statement) are satisfied or waived in accordance with the Merger Agreement, other than any conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) in no event (except to the extent Parent and Magnachip agree in writing) will the closing occur prior to the date that is 60 days after the date of the Merger Agreement and (2) if the date on which the closing is set to occur would follow the Termination Date (as described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination of the Merger Agreement” beginning on page 110 of this proxy statement), then the Termination Date will instead be extended to occur one business day after such date (subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to closing of the Merger on the initial Termination Date (other than any conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing, but which were, at the initial Termination Date, capable of being satisfied)). The Merger will become effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Merger, or at such later time as is agreed by the parties and specified in the Certificate of Merger.

Appraisal Rights

This section summarizes certain material provisions of Delaware law pertaining to appraisal rights in connection with the Merger. The following discussion is not a complete statement of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under Delaware law and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of Section 262 of the DGCL

78

(“Section 262”), which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex B and incorporated herein by reference. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice and does not constitute a recommendation that stockholders exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262. All references in Section 262 of the DGCL and in this summary to a “stockholder” or a “holder of shares” are to the record holder of shares of Company Common Stock unless otherwise noted. Only a holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock is entitled to demand appraisal rights for the shares registered in that holder’s name. A person having a beneficial interest in shares of Company Common Stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow the steps summarized below properly and in a timely manner to perfect appraisal rights. If you hold your shares of Company Common Stock through a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee.

Any stockholder contemplating the exercise of such appraisal rights should review carefully the provisions of Section 262, which is attached hereto as Annex B, particularly the procedural steps required to properly demand and perfect such rights. Failure to follow the steps required by Section 262 for demanding and perfecting appraisal rights may result in the loss of such rights.

Under Section 262, stockholders who (1) submit a written demand for an appraisal of their shares of Company Common Stock to the Company prior to the stockholder vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger; (2) do not submit a proxy or otherwise vote in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger; (3) hold Company Common Stock upon the making of a demand under clause (1) and continue to hold their shares of Company Common Stock through the effective date of the Merger; and (4) do not thereafter withdraw their demand for appraisal of their shares or otherwise lose their appraisal rights, in each case in accordance with the DGCL; and (5) otherwise meet the criteria and follow the procedures set forth in Section 262 may be entitled to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive, in lieu of the Merger Consideration, payment in cash of the amount determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery to be the “fair value” of the shares of Company Common Stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger, together with interest to be paid on the amount determined to be fair value, if any, as determined by the court (subject, in the case of interest payments, to any voluntary cash payments made by the Surviving Corporation pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL that have the effect of limiting the sum on which interest accrues as described below). However, assuming the Company Common Stock remains listed on a national securities exchange immediately prior to the Merger (which we expect to be the case), after an appraisal petition has been filed, the Delaware Court of Chancery will dismiss appraisal proceedings as to all holders of Company Common Stock who asserted appraisal rights unless (x) the total number of shares for which appraisal rights have been pursued and perfected exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock as measured in accordance with subsection (g) of Section 262 or (y) the value of the aggregate Merger Consideration in respect of such shares exceeds $1,000,000. We refer to these conditions as the “ownership thresholds.” Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery, in its discretion, determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest on an appraisal award will accrue and compound quarterly from the effective date of the Merger through the date the judgment is paid at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during such period; provided, however, that at any time before the Delaware Court of Chancery enters judgment in the appraisal proceeding, the Surviving Corporation may pay to each stockholder entitled to appraisal an amount in cash, in which case any such interest will accrue after the time of such payment only on the amount that equals the sum of (1) the difference, if any, between the amount so paid and the “fair value” of the shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and (2) any interest accrued prior to the time of such voluntary payment, unless paid at such time. The Surviving Corporation is under no obligation to make such voluntary cash payment prior to such entry of judgment. Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as determined pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL could be more than, the same as or less than the $29.00 per share consideration payable pursuant to the Merger Agreement if they did not seek appraisal of their shares.

79

Under Section 262, where a merger agreement is to be submitted for adoption at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders who was such as of the close of business on the record date for notice of such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available that appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262. This proxy statement constitutes our notice to the holders of Company Common Stock that appraisal rights are available in connection with the Merger, and the full text of Section 262 is attached to this proxy statement as Annex B. In connection with the Merger, any holder of shares of Company Common Stock who wishes to exercise appraisal rights or who wishes to preserve such holder’s right to do so should review Annex B carefully. Failure to comply with the requirements of Section 262 in a timely and proper manner may result in the loss of appraisal rights under the DGCL. A stockholder who loses his, her or its appraisal rights will be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration described in the Merger Agreement (without interest) upon surrender of the certificates that formerly represented such shares of Company Common Stock. Moreover, because of the complexity of the procedures for exercising the right to seek appraisal of shares of Company Common Stock, we believe that if a stockholder considers exercising such rights, that stockholder should seek the advice of legal counsel.

Stockholders wishing to exercise the right to seek an appraisal of their shares of Company Common Stock must comply with Section 262 of the DGCL, which means doing, among other things, ALL of the following:

In addition, assuming the Company Common Stock remains listed on a national securities exchange immediately prior to the Effective Time (which we expect to be the case), one of the ownership thresholds must be met.

Because a proxy that does not contain voting instructions will, unless timely revoked, be voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger, a stockholder who votes by proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights should not return a blank proxy, but rather must vote against the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger, abstain or not vote its shares.

Filing Written Demand

Any holder of shares of Company Common Stock wishing to exercise appraisal rights must deliver to us, before the vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger at the special meeting, a written demand for the appraisal of the stockholder’s shares, and that stockholder must not vote or submit a proxy in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger. A holder of shares of Company Common Stock exercising appraisal rights must hold of record the shares on the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to hold the shares of record through the effective date of the Merger. Neither voting against the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger nor abstaining

80

from voting or failing to vote on the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger will, in and of itself, constitute a written demand for appraisal satisfying the requirements of Section 262. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger. A proxy or vote against the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger will not constitute a demand. A stockholder’s failure to make the written demand prior to the taking of the vote on the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger at the special meeting may constitute a waiver of appraisal rights.

Only a holder of record of shares of Company Common Stock is entitled to demand appraisal rights for the shares registered in that holder’s name. A demand for appraisal in respect of shares of Company Common Stock should be executed by or on behalf of the holder of record and must reasonably inform us of the identity of the holder and state that the person intends thereby to demand appraisal of the holder’s shares in connection with the Merger. If the shares are owned of record in a fiduciary or representative capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, such demand must be executed by or on behalf of the record owner, and if the shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy and tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or on behalf of all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for two or more joint owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a holder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for the record owner or owners. A holder of record, such as a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, who holds shares of Company Common Stock as nominee or intermediary for others may exercise appraisal rights with respect to shares of Company Common Stock held for one or more beneficial owners while not exercising appraisal rights for other beneficial owners. In that case, the written demand should state the number of shares of Company Common Stock as to which appraisal is sought. Where no number of shares of Company Common Stock is expressly mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares of Company Common Stock held in the name of the holder of record.

A person who has a beneficial interest in shares of Company Common Stock held of record in the name of another person, such as a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights should consult with their brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, as applicable, to determine the appropriate procedures for the brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee to make a demand for appraisal of those shares. If any such brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee in turn holds the shares through a central securities depository nominee, such as Cede & Co., a demand for appraisal of such shares must be made by or on behalf of the depository nominee and must identify the depository nominee as the record holder. A person having a beneficial interest in shares held of record in the name of another person, such as a brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow properly and in a timely manner the steps necessary to perfect appraisal rights.

All written demands for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 should be mailed or delivered to:

Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation

c/o Magnachip Semiconductor, Ltd.

Attention: Corporate Secretary

V-Plex Bldg.,15F, 501, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 06168

Surviving Corporation’s Actions After Completion of the Merger

If the Merger is completed, within 10 days after the effective date of the Merger, the Surviving Corporation will notify each holder of shares of Company Common Stock who has made a written demand for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 and who has not voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger that the Merger has become effective and the effective date thereof. At any time within 60 days after the effective date of the Merger, any holder of shares of Company Common Stock who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party may withdraw his, her or its demand for

81

appraisal and accept the consideration offered pursuant to the Merger Agreement by delivering to us a written withdrawal of the demand for appraisal, but after such 60-day period a demand for appraisal may be withdrawn only with the written approval of the Surviving Corporation. Furthermore, no appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party may withdraw such stockholder’s demand for appraisal and accept the terms offered upon the Merger within 60 days after the effective date of the Merger.

Within 120 days after the effective date of the Merger, the Surviving Corporation or any record holder of shares of Company Common Stock who has complied with Section 262 and is entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262, or a beneficial owner of shares as to which the record holder has so complied with Section 262, may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with a copy served on the Surviving Corporation in the case of a petition filed by a stockholder of record or beneficial owner, demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares held by all our stockholders entitled to appraisal. The Surviving Corporation is under no obligation, and has no present intention, to file a petition, and holders should not assume that the Surviving Corporation will file a petition or initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of the shares of Company Common Stock. Accordingly, any holders of Company Common Stock who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate all necessary action to perfect their appraisal rights in respect of their shares of Company Common Stock within the time and in the manner prescribed in Section 262. The failure of a record holder or beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock to file such a petition within the period specified in Section 262 could result in the loss of appraisal rights.

Within 120 days after the effective date of the Merger, any record holder of shares of Company Common Stock who has complied with the requirements for exercise of appraisal rights, or a beneficial owner of shares as to which the record holder has so complied, will be entitled, upon written request, to receive from the Surviving Corporation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger and with respect to which we have received demands for appraisal, and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. The Surviving Corporation must mail this statement to the requesting stockholder or beneficial owner within 10 days after receipt of the written request for such a statement or within 10 days after the expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later.

If a petition for an appraisal is duly filed by a record holder of shares of Company Common Stock or a beneficial owner and a copy thereof is served upon the Surviving Corporation, the Surviving Corporation will then be obligated within 20 days after such service to file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly verified list (the “Verified List”) containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached. Upon the filing of any such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery may order that notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing on the petition be mailed to the Surviving Corporation and all of the stockholders shown on the Verified List at the addresses stated therein. Such notice will also be published at least one week before the day of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware, or in another publication determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery. The costs of these notices are borne by the Surviving Corporation.

After notice to the stockholders as required by the court, the Delaware Court of Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing on the petition to determine those stockholders who have complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled to appraisal rights thereunder. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require the stockholders who demanded appraisal of their shares to submit their stock certificates to the Delaware Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings, and if any stockholder fails to comply with that direction, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss that stockholder from the proceedings. In addition, assuming the Company Common Stock was listed on a national securities exchange immediately

82

prior to the Effective Time, the Delaware Court of Chancery will dismiss the appraisal proceedings as to all our stockholders who assert appraisal rights unless one of the ownership thresholds is met.

Determination of Fair Value

After determining the holders of Company Common Stock entitled to appraisal and that at least one of the ownership thresholds above has been satisfied in respect of our stockholders seeking appraisal rights, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine the “fair value” of the shares of Company Common Stock subject to appraisal, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the Merger, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value (subject, in the case of interest payments, to any voluntary cash payments made by the Surviving Corporation pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL that have the effect of limiting the sum on which interest accrues as described below). Unless the court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the Merger through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the Merger and the date of payment of the judgment. However, the Surviving Corporation has the right, at any point prior to the Delaware Court of Chancery’s entry of judgment in the proceedings, to make a voluntary cash payment to each stockholder seeking appraisal. If the Surviving Corporation makes a voluntary cash payment pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262, interest will accrue thereafter only on the sum of (1) the difference, if any, between the amount paid by the Surviving Corporation in such voluntary cash payment and the fair value of the shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and (2) interest accrued before such voluntary cash payment, unless paid at that time.

In determining fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Supreme Court of Delaware discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that “proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered, and that “[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company.” The Delaware Supreme Court stated that, in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts that could be ascertained as of the date of the merger that throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 provides that fair value is to be “exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger.” In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a “narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value,” but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Supreme Court of Delaware also stated that “elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered.”

Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares of Company Common Stock as so determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery could be more than, the same as or less than the consideration they would receive pursuant to the Merger if they did not seek appraisal of their shares of Company Common Stock and that an opinion of an investment banking firm as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration payable in a Merger is not an opinion as to, and may not in any manner address, “fair value” under Section 262 of the DGCL. Although we believe that the Merger Consideration is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and holders of Company Common Stock should recognize that such an appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the Merger Consideration. Neither we nor Parent anticipates offering more than the Merger Consideration to any holder of shares of Company Common Stock exercising appraisal rights, and we and Parent each reserve the right to make a voluntary cash payment pursuant to subsection (h) of Section 262 of the DGCL and to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that for purposes of Section 262, the “fair value” of a share of Company Common Stock is less than

83

the Merger Consideration. If a demand for appraisal is duly withdrawn, a petition for appraisal is not timely filed, neither of the ownership thresholds is met, or other requirements imposed by Section 262 to perfect and seek appraisal are not satisfied, then the right to an appraisal will cease.

Upon application by the Surviving Corporation or by any holder of shares of Company Common Stock entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Delaware Court of Chancery may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholders entitled to an appraisal. Any holder of shares of Company Common Stock whose name appears on the Verified List and, if such shares are represented by certificates and if so required, who has submitted such stockholder’s certificates of Company Common Stock to the Delaware Register in Chancery, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights or that neither of the ownership thresholds is met. The Delaware Court of Chancery will direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the Surviving Corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Payment will be made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock, forthwith, and in the case of holders of shares represented by certificates, upon the surrender to the Surviving Corporation of the certificate(s) representing such stock. The Delaware Court of Chancery’s decree may be enforced as other decrees in such court may be enforced.

The costs of the appraisal proceedings (which do not include attorneys’ fees or the fees and expenses of experts) may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable under the circumstances. Upon application of a holder of shares of Company Common Stock, the Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by a holder of shares of Company Common Stock in connection with an appraisal, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to appraisal. In the absence of such an order, each party bears its own expenses.

If any stockholder who demands appraisal of his, her or its shares of Company Common Stock under Section 262 fails to perfect, or loses or successfully withdraws, such holder’s right to appraisal, the stockholder’s shares of Company Common Stock will be deemed to have been converted at the Effective Time into the right to receive the consideration payable in the Merger, without interest. A stockholder will fail to perfect, or effectively lose or withdraw, the holder’s right to appraisal if no petition for appraisal is filed within 120 days after the effective date of the Merger, if neither of the ownership thresholds is met or if the stockholder delivers to the Surviving Corporation a written withdrawal of the holder’s demand for appraisal and an acceptance of the consideration payable in the Merger in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL.

From and after the Effective Time, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights will be entitled to vote such shares of Company Common Stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock, except dividends or other distributions on the holder’s shares of Company Common Stock, if any, payable to stockholders as of a time prior to the Effective Time. If no petition for an appraisal is filed, if neither of the ownership thresholds is met or if the stockholder delivers to the Surviving Corporation a written withdrawal of the demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the Merger Consideration, either within 60 days after the effective date of the Merger or thereafter with the written approval of the Surviving Corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal will cease. Once a petition for appraisal is filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery, however, the appraisal proceeding may not be dismissed as to any stockholder who commenced the proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party without the approval of the court; provided that this sentence does not affect the right of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such stockholder’s demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the Merger within 60 days after the effective date of the Merger.

Failure to comply with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 of the DGCL may result in the loss of a stockholder’s statutory appraisal rights. Consequently, any holder of shares of Company Common Stock wishing to exercise appraisal rights is encouraged to consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise those rights.

84

Accounting Treatment

The Merger will be accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting for financial accounting purposes.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

The following discussion is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Merger that may be relevant to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders (both as defined below) of shares of Company Common Stock whose shares are converted into the right to receive cash pursuant to the Merger. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the regulations promulgated under the Code (the “Treasury Regulations”), court decisions, published positions of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date of this proxy statement and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion is limited to holders who hold their shares of Company Common Stock as “capital assets” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment).

This discussion is for general information only and does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to holders in light of their particular circumstances. For example, this discussion does not address:

If a partnership (including an entity or arrangement, domestic or foreign, treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock, then the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partner and the partnership. Partnerships holding shares of Company Common Stock and partners therein are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the consequences of the Merger.

85

No opinion of counsel or ruling from the IRS has been or will be obtained regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Merger described below. If the IRS contests a conclusion set forth herein, no assurance can be given that a holder would ultimately prevail in a final determination by a court.

YOU ARE URGED TO CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISORS CONCERNING THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE MERGER IN LIGHT OF YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND ANY CONSEQUENCES ARISING UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR NON-U.S. TAXING JURISDICTION.

U.S. Holders

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

The receipt of cash by a U.S. Holder in exchange for shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, such U.S. Holder’s gain or loss will be equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash received and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares surrendered pursuant to the Merger. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis generally will equal the amount that such U.S. Holder paid for the shares reduced, but not below zero, by any distributions received that were in excess of the Company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits with respect to the taxable year in which such distribution was made. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if such U.S. Holder’s holding period in such shares is more than one year at the time of the completion of the Merger. A reduced tax rate on capital gain generally will apply to long-term capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. Holder (including individuals). The deductibility of capital losses is subject to substantial limitations. If a U.S. Holder acquired different blocks of shares of Company Common Stock at different times or different prices, such U.S. Holder must determine its adjusted tax basis and holding period separately with respect to each block of shares of Company Common Stock (i.e., common stock acquired at the same cost in a single transaction).

U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts, and whose income exceeds certain thresholds, are required to pay an additional 3.8% tax on their “net investment income.” Net investment income includes, among other items, capital gains recognized on the receipt of cash in exchange for shares of Company Common Stock, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of the net investment income tax on their exchange of shares of Company Common Stock for cash pursuant to the Merger.

Non-U.S. Holders

For purposes of this discussion, the term “Non-U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of shares of Company Common Stock that is neither a U.S. Holder nor a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Any gain realized by a Non-U.S. Holder as a result of the receipt of cash in exchange for shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the Merger generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless:

86

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Information reporting and backup withholding (at a rate of 24%) may apply to proceeds received by a U.S. Holder or Non-U.S. Holder pursuant to the Merger. Backup withholding, however, will not apply to: (1) a U.S. Holder that furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that such U.S. Holder is not subject to backup withholding on IRS Form W-9 (or a substitute or successor form) and otherwise complies with all applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules; (2) a Non-U.S. Holder that provides a certification of such Non-U.S. Holder’s foreign status on the appropriate IRS Form W-8 (or a substitute or successor form); or (3) a U.S. Holder or Non-U.S. Holder that otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS. You are urged to consult your own tax advisors regarding the information reporting and backup withholding tax rules.

THE DISCUSSION SET FORTH ABOVE IS NOT A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OR DISCUSSION OF ALL POTENTIAL TAX CONSEQUENCES RELEVANT TO HOLDERS OF COMPANY COMMON STOCK. THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER MAY VARY DEPENDING UPON THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF EACH STOCKHOLDER. YOU ARE URGED TO CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISORS CONCERNING THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, NON-U.S. INCOME OR OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO YOU.

Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger

In the Merger Agreement, subject to certain limitations (including those in the immediately subsequent paragraph), we and Parent have agreed to, and Parent has agreed to cause each of its affiliates to, use our respective reasonable best efforts to promptly (1) obtain any consents, approvals or other authorizations, and make any filings and notifications, required in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (2) make any other submissions either required or deemed appropriate by both Parent and Magnachip in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under applicable law and (3) take or cause to be taken all other actions necessary, proper or advisable consistent with the efforts provision

87

of the Merger Agreement (as described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Efforts to Close the Merger” beginning on page 105 of this proxy statement) to cause the expiration of the applicable waiting periods, or receipt of required consents, approvals or authorizations, as applicable, under any law as soon as reasonably practicable. Subject to the following paragraph, Parent has agreed to take, and will cause its affiliates to take (and Magnachip and our affiliates will be permitted to take, without affecting any representation or warranty in the Merger Agreement, but subject to the following paragraph and the last sentence of this paragraph), all action necessary to (1) cause the expiration of the applicable waiting periods, or receipt of required consents, approvals or authorizations, as applicable, under any laws, including the Required Competition Approval and (2) avoid the entry or to effect the dissolution of, or vacate or lift, any order or other requirement of a governmental authority which would otherwise have the effect of preventing, impairing or delaying the closing, including: (i) objecting to and resisting any regulatory action or direction that seeks to require a filing with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (except as contemplated under the Merger Agreement, including with respect to a Requesting Authority), (ii) selling, licensing, divesting or disposing of or holding separate any entities, assets, intellectual property or businesses (including, after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation or any of its subsidiaries), (iii) terminating, amending or assigning existing relationships or contractual rights and obligations, (iv) changing or modifying any course of conduct regarding future operations, (v) otherwise taking actions that would limit its freedom of action with respect to, or its ability to retain, one or more of their respective businesses, assets or rights or interests therein and (vi) committing to take any such actions in the foregoing clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v). For the avoidance of doubt, Parent will not require Magnachip or our subsidiaries to take, and Magnachip and our subsidiaries will not be required to take, any action described in the preceding sentence that is not conditioned upon the consummation of the Merger. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Merger Agreement, neither Magnachip nor any of our subsidiaries or affiliates will take any action described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) or (vi) of the first sentence of this paragraph without the prior written consent of Parent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, except (1) with respect to the Required Competition Approval and (2) in the case of any filings, applications or submissions required by applicable law in the PRC or the issuance or enactment of any order or law by the State Administration for Market Regulation in the PRC (solely in its capacity under the Anti-monopoly Law (China) on antitrust review of business concentrations) or the National People’s Congress of the PRC or its Standing Committee (in each of cases (1) and (2), which, for the avoidance of doubt, will be subject to the immediately preceding paragraph without application of this paragraph), Parent will not be required to agree to, or accept or suffer to have imposed upon Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries (and, without Parent’s consent, none of Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries, prior to the closing, will agree to or accept or suffer to have imposed upon it), any Burdensome Condition (as defined under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Efforts to Close the Merger” beginning on page 105 of this proxy statement). If Parent becomes aware of a Burdensome Condition, it must provide prompt notice thereof (and in any event within five days) to Magnachip.

Anti-monopoly Law (China)

Under the Merger Agreement, the Merger cannot be completed until the Required Competition Approval is obtained.

Other Regulatory Approvals

In addition, we and Parent have agreed to, and Parent has agreed to cause its affiliates to, (1) file and not withdraw, as promptly as practicable after the date of the Merger Agreement, any filings, notification forms, applications, submissions, and related material required to be filed with any governmental authority or requested by any Requesting Authority, in each case with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and (2) promptly make any further filings or submissions pursuant thereto that may be necessary, proper or advisable.

88

One or more governmental agencies may require filings or submissions or impose a condition, restriction, qualification, requirement or limitation when it grants the necessary approvals and consents. Third parties may also seek to intervene in the regulatory process or litigate to enjoin or overturn regulatory approvals, any of which actions could significantly impede or even preclude obtaining required regulatory approvals. There is currently no way to predict whether a governmental authority will assert or attempt to assert jurisdiction over, or request, require or attempt to require a filing or submission (other than the Required Competition Approval) related to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, how long it will take to obtain all of the required regulatory approvals or whether such approvals will ultimately be obtained and there may be a substantial period of time between the approval by stockholders and the completion of the Merger.

Although we expect that all required regulatory clearances and approvals will be obtained, we cannot assure you that these regulatory clearances and approvals will be timely obtained, obtained at all or that the granting of these regulatory clearances and approvals will not involve the imposition of additional conditions on the completion of the Merger, including the requirement to divest assets, or require changes to the terms of the Merger Agreement. These conditions or changes could result in the conditions to the Merger not being satisfied.

Litigation Relating to the Merger

Since April 22, 2021, nine complaints have been filed seeking to enjoin the Merger, or, if the Merger is consummated, rescind the Merger or recover damages, as well as an award of each plaintiff’s fees and litigation expenses. The lawsuits, each filed as an individual action by a purported stockholder of the Company, are captioned as Schulthess v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03587 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Schulthess Complaint”), Pittman v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02306 (E.D.N.Y.), Flanagan v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03743 (S.D.N.Y.), Castelli v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03769 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Castelli Complaint”), Doolittle v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03801 (S.D.N.Y.), Thomas v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03860 (S.D.N.Y.), Finger v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03927 (S.D.N.Y.), Kent v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00657 (D. Del.), and Kennedy v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-02110 (E.D. Pa.). Each complaint alleges that the preliminary proxy statement filed by the Company with the SEC on April 19, 2021 is false and/or misleading and asserts claims for violations of Section 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 14a-9 against the Company and certain current or former members of our Board. The Schulthess and Castelli Complaints also allege breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current or former members of our Board. The Schulthess Complaint further alleges that the Company aided and abetted purported breaches of fiduciary duties by certain current or former members of our Board. The Company believes the disclosures in the preliminary proxy statement comply fully with all applicable law and that the lawsuits are entirely without merit.

Additional lawsuits arising out of or relating to the Merger Agreement or the Merger may be filed in the future. The results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict and could delay or prevent the completion of the Merger. The existence of litigation relating to the Merger could impact the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the Merger. Moreover, the pending litigation is, and any future additional litigation could be, time consuming and expensive and could divert management’s attention away from its regular business.

Effect on Magnachip if the Merger is Not Completed

If the Merger Agreement is not adopted and the Merger is not approved by stockholders or if the Merger is not completed for any other reason, stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares of Company Common Stock. Instead, we will remain a stand-alone public company, our shares of Company Common Stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE and registered under the Exchange Act and we will continue to file periodic reports with the SEC. In addition, if the Merger is not completed, we expect that management will operate the business in a manner similar to that in which it is being operated today and that stockholders will continue to be subject to the same risks and opportunities to which they are currently subject, including risks related to the highly competitive industry in which we operate and risks related to adverse economic conditions.

89

Furthermore, if the Merger is not completed, and depending on the circumstances that caused the Merger not to be completed, the price of our shares of Company Common Stock may decline significantly. If that were to occur, it is uncertain when, if ever, the price of our shares of Company Common Stock would return to the price at which it trades as of the date of this proxy statement.

Accordingly, if the Merger is not completed, there can be no assurance as to the effect of these risks and opportunities on the future value of your shares of Company Common Stock. If the Merger is not completed, our Board will continue to evaluate and review our business operations, strategic direction and capitalization, among other things, and will make such changes as are deemed appropriate. If the Merger Agreement is not adopted and the Merger is not approved by stockholders or if the Merger is not completed for any other reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction acceptable to our Board will be offered or that our business, prospects or results of operation will not be adversely impacted.

In addition, we will be required to pay to Parent a termination fee of up to $42,100,000 if the Merger Agreement is terminated under specified circumstances. For more information, please see the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees” beginning on page 113 of this proxy statement.

Vote Required and Board Recommendation

The Merger Agreement must be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock entitled to vote thereon. If you are a stockholder of record and you abstain from voting or fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger. If you are a beneficial owner and you abstain from voting, fail to cast your vote in person or by proxy, or fail to give voting instructions to your brokerage firm, bank, trust or other nominee, it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger.

Our Board has unanimously (i) approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement and (ii) determined that it is in the best interests of Magnachip and its stockholders that Magnachip enter into the Merger Agreement and consummate the Merger on the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement.

Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger.

90

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

Explanatory Note Regarding the Merger Agreement

The following summary describes the material provisions of the Merger Agreement. The descriptions of the Merger Agreement in this summary and elsewhere in this proxy statement are not complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A and incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. We encourage you to read the Merger Agreement carefully and in its entirety because this summary may not contain all the information about the Merger Agreement that is important to you. The rights and obligations of the parties are governed by the express terms of the Merger Agreement and not by this summary or any other information contained in this proxy statement. Capitalized terms used in this section but not defined in this proxy statement have the meaning ascribed to them in the Merger Agreement.

The representations, warranties, covenants and agreements described below and included in the Merger Agreement: (1) were made only for purposes of the Merger Agreement and as of specific dates; (2) were made solely for the benefit of the parties to the Merger Agreement; and (3) may be subject to important qualifications, limitations and supplemental information agreed to by Magnachip, Parent and Merger Sub in connection with negotiating the terms of the Merger Agreement. The representations and warranties may also be subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from those generally applicable to reports and documents filed with the SEC and in some cases were qualified by confidential matters disclosed to Parent and Merger Sub by Magnachip in connection with the Merger Agreement. In addition, the representations and warranties may have been included in the Merger Agreement for the purpose of allocating contractual risk between Magnachip, Parent and Merger Sub rather than to establish matters as facts, and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to such parties that differ from those applicable to investors. Stockholders are not third-party beneficiaries under the Merger Agreement (other than after the closing with respect to their right to receive the Merger Consideration and the right of Magnachip on behalf of the Stockholders to pursue Damages as more fully described below) and should not rely on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of Magnachip, Parent or Merger Sub or any of their respective affiliates or businesses. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may change after the date of the Merger Agreement. In addition, you should not rely on the covenants in the Merger Agreement as actual limitations on the respective businesses of Magnachip, Parent and Merger Sub, because the parties may take certain actions that are either expressly permitted in the confidential disclosure letter to the Merger Agreement or as otherwise consented to by the appropriate party, which consent may be given without prior notice to the public. The Merger Agreement is described below, and included as Annex A, only to provide you with information regarding its terms and conditions, and not to provide any other factual information regarding Magnachip, our business, Parent or Merger Sub. Accordingly, the representations, warranties, covenants and other agreements in the Merger Agreement should not be read alone, and you should read the information provided elsewhere in this document and in our filings with the SEC regarding Magnachip and our business.

Effects of the Merger; Directors and Officers; Certificate of Incorporation; Bylaws

The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, and in accordance with the DGCL, at the Effective Time, (1) Merger Sub will be merged with and into Magnachip, (2) the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease and Magnachip will continue its corporate existence under the DGCL as the surviving corporation in the Merger (sometimes referred to herein as the “Surviving Corporation”) and (3) the Surviving Corporation will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. At the Effective Time, all of the property, rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises of Magnachip and Merger Sub will vest in the Surviving Corporation, and all debts, liabilities, obligations, restrictions and duties of Magnachip and Merger Sub will become the debts, liabilities, obligations, restrictions and duties of the Surviving Corporation.

91

The Parties will take all requisite action so that the directors of Merger Sub immediately before the Effective Time will be, from and after the Effective Time, the directors of the Surviving Corporation until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Surviving Corporation and applicable law. From and after the Effective Time, the officers of Magnachip immediately before the Effective Time will be the officers of the Surviving Corporation until their successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Surviving Corporation and applicable law. At the Effective Time, the certificate of incorporation of Magnachip as the Surviving Corporation will be amended and restated in its entirety as set forth on an exhibit to the Merger Agreement, until thereafter amended as provided in such certificate of incorporation or applicable law, and the bylaws of Magnachip as the Surviving Corporation will be amended and restated in their entirety to read substantially identically to the bylaws of Merger Sub as in effect immediately before the Effective Time, until, subject to the provisions of the Merger Agreement with respect to director and officer indemnification (as described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance” beginning on page 107 of this proxy statement), thereafter amended as provided in the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Surviving Corporation and by applicable law.

Closing and Effective Time

The closing of the Merger will take place on the tenth business day after the day on which all of the conditions to closing of the Merger (as described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Merger” beginning on page 108 of this proxy statement) are satisfied or waived in accordance with the Merger Agreement, other than any conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) in no event (except to the extent Parent and Magnachip agree in writing) will the closing occur prior to the date that is 60 days after the date of the Merger Agreement and (2) if the date on which the closing is set to occur would follow the Termination Date (as described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination of the Merger Agreement” beginning on page 110 of this proxy statement), then the Termination Date will instead be extended to occur one business day after such date (subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to closing of the Merger on the initial Termination Date (other than any conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing, but which were, at the initial Termination Date, capable of being satisfied)). The Merger will become effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Merger, or at such later time as is agreed by the parties and specified in the Certificate of Merger.

Merger Consideration

Common Stock

Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the parties or any stockholder, each share of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately before the Effective Time (other than (1) any shares of Company Common Stock owned by Magnachip or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries or by Parent or any of its subsidiaries immediately before the Effective Time and (2) any shares of Company Common Stock for which the holder thereof (a) has not voted in favor of the Merger or consented to it in writing and (b) has properly and validly exercised their statutory rights of appraisal in respect of such shares of Company Common Stock in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL) will be canceled and will cease to exist and will be automatically converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration (which is $29.00 in cash, without interest and subject to applicable withholding taxes).

92

Company Equity Awards

Treatment of Company Options

Magnachip will use reasonable best efforts so that, as of the Effective Time, each Company Option granted under the Company Equity Plans outstanding immediately before the Effective Time, whether or not then exercisable or vested, by virtue of the Merger and without any further action by Parent, Merger Sub, Magnachip or the holder of that Company Option, will be canceled and converted into the right to receive from Parent or the Surviving Corporation an amount in cash, without interest, equal to (1) the excess, if any, of the Merger Consideration over the per share exercise or purchase price of the applicable Company Option multiplied by (2) the aggregate number of shares of Company Common Stock underlying such Company Option immediately before the Effective Time. If the per share exercise price or purchase price of any Company Option is greater than or equal to the Merger Consideration, such Company Option will be cancelled and terminated as of the Effective Time without any cash payment being made or other consideration provided in respect thereof.

Treatment of Company RSUs

Magnachip will use reasonable best efforts so that, as of the Effective Time, each Company RSU outstanding immediately before the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action by Parent, Merger Sub, Magnachip or the holder of such Company RSU, shall be vested and all restrictions thereon shall lapse in full as of immediately before the Effective Time, and each such vested Company RSU will be canceled and converted into the right to receive from Parent (or the Surviving Corporation) an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the Merger Consideration multiplied by the number of shares of Company Common Stock that such Company RSU conveyed the right to receive.

Treatment of Company PSUs

Magnachip will use reasonable best efforts so that, as of the Effective Time, each Company PSU outstanding immediately before the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action by Parent, Merger Sub, Magnachip or the holder of such Company PSU, shall be vested and all restrictions thereon shall lapse in full and the number of shares of Company Common Stock subject to such Company PSU earned or deemed earned based on performance measures that shall be equal to the maximum amount of such award as of immediately before the Effective Time, and each such vested Company PSU will be canceled and converted into the right to receive from Parent (or the Surviving Corporation) an amount in cash, without interest, equal to the Merger Consideration multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock that such Company PSU conveyed the right to receive.

Payments with Respect to Company Equity Awards

As promptly as practicable following the Effective Time, Parent will cause the Paying Agent (as defined below) to pay the aggregate amounts described above that are payable with respect to each Company Equity Award to the Surviving Corporation, and promptly thereafter (in any event not later than the third business day after the Effective Time), Parent will cause the Surviving Corporation to pay the applicable amount payable to each holder of a Company Equity Award through its payroll system, subject to reduction by any income or employment tax withholding required under the Code or any applicable state, local or non-U.S. tax law.

Company ESPP

Magnachip will use reasonable best efforts so that (i) no future offering periods shall commence under the Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Company ESPP”) after the date of the Merger Agreement and (ii) the Company ESPP will terminate effective as of immediately prior to the Effective Time.

93

Payment Procedures

Not less than three business days before the Effective Time, Parent will select a bank or trust company, satisfactory to Magnachip in its reasonable discretion, to act as the paying agent in the Merger (the “Paying Agent”). Immediately prior to the Effective Time (with the filing of the Delaware Certificate of Merger being subject to the receipt by Magnachip of written confirmation from the Paying Agent that the following deposit from Parent has been received), Parent will deposit or cause to be deposited with the Paying Agent cash sufficient to pay the aggregate Merger Consideration to holders of Company Common Stock and the aggregate amounts payable to holders of Company Equity Awards described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Merger Consideration—Company Equity Awards” beginning on page 93 of this proxy statement.

As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Time (but in any event no more than two business days after the date on which the Effective Time occurs), Parent will cause the Paying Agent to mail to each holder of record of a share of Company Common Stock a letter of transmittal and instructions for surrendering stock certificates (if any) and book-entry shares in exchange for the Merger Consideration payable in respect thereof. Upon surrender of a stock certificate for cancellation to the Paying Agent, together with a duly executed letter transmittal and any other documents and information reasonably required by the Paying Agent, the holder of such stock certificate will be entitled to receive, and the Paying Agent will promptly pay in exchange therefor, the Merger Consideration payable in respect of the number of shares formerly evidenced by that stock certificate less any required withholding of taxes. Upon receipt of an “agent’s message” by the Paying Agent (or such other evidence, if any, of transfer as the Paying Agent may reasonably request) in the case of a surrender of book-entry shares, the holder of such book-entry shares will be entitled to receive, and the Paying Agent will promptly pay in exchange therefor, the Merger Consideration payable in respect of such book-entry shares less any required withholding of taxes.

If any portion of the cash deposited with the Paying Agent remains unclaimed one year after the Effective Time, such cash will be delivered by the Paying Agent to Parent upon demand. Thereafter, any holder of stock certificates or book-entry shares who has not complied with the exchange procedures in the Merger Agreement will look only to Parent and the Surviving Corporation, which will remain responsible for payment of the applicable Merger Consideration. If any certificates or book-entry shares have not been surrendered prior to the date on which the cash amounts payable with respect thereto would escheat to or become the property of any governmental authority, any such cash amounts will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, immediately prior to such time become the property of Parent, free and clear of all claims or interest of any person previously entitled thereto.

If any stock certificate is lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the person claiming such stock certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if reasonably required by the Surviving Corporation, the execution and delivery by such person of a customary indemnity agreement to provide indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with respect to such stock certificate, the Paying Agent will pay the Merger Consideration to such person in respect of the shares of Company Common Stock represented by such Certificate.

Representations and Warranties

The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties of Magnachip, Parent and Merger Sub.

Some of the representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement made by us are qualified as to “materiality” or “Company Material Adverse Effect.” For purposes of the Merger Agreement, “Company Material Adverse Effect” means any fact, event, circumstance, change, condition, occurrence or effect that, individually or in the aggregate with all other facts, events, circumstances, changes, conditions, occurrences and effects, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations or financial condition of Magnachip and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided, that the term

94

“Company Material Adverse Effect” shall not include any of the following nor any fact, event, circumstance, change, condition, occurrence or effect relating to or arising or resulting from any of the following (in each case, by itself or when aggregated):

95

except, in the case of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, seventh and eighth bullet above, to the extent any such effect has a disproportionate adverse impact on Magnachip and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to other similarly situated companies in the industries in which Magnachip and its subsidiaries operate; provided, further, that with respect to references to Company Material Adverse Effect in the representations and warranties with respect to governmental authorizations and non-contravention, the exceptions set forth in the eleventh bullet above will not apply.

Some of the representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement made by Parent and Merger Sub are qualified as to “materiality” or “Parent Material Adverse Effect.” For purposes of the Merger Agreement, “Parent Material Adverse Effect” means any event, circumstance, development, change or effect that, individually or in the aggregate with all other events, circumstances, developments, changes and effects, would prevent, impair or materially delay the consummation by Parent or Merger Sub of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or prevent or materially impair or delay the ability of Parent or Merger Sub to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement.

In the Merger Agreement, we have made customary representations and warranties to Parent and Merger Sub that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications contained in the Merger Agreement. These representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

96

97

In the Merger Agreement, Parent and Merger Sub have made customary representations and warranties to Magnachip that are subject, in some cases, to specified exceptions and qualifications contained in the Merger Agreement. These representations and warranties relate to, among other things:

Conduct of Business Pending the Merger

The Merger Agreement provides that, except (1) as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (2) as set forth in Magnachip’s confidential disclosure letter to the Merger Agreement, (3) to comply with any COVID-19 Measures, (4) as required by applicable law or policy or guidance from a governmental authority, (5) for any action (including cessation of activities) taken by Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries that Magnachip or such subsidiary, after reasonable consultation with Parent, reasonably believes is required in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the officers and employees of any of the Businesses and all other individuals having business dealings with any of the Businesses or (6) with the prior written consent of Parent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned, during the period of time between the date of the Merger Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time or the termination of the Merger Agreement pursuant to its

98

terms, Magnachip will, and will cause each of our subsidiaries to, use our commercially reasonable efforts to conduct our operations only in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice.

In addition, we have agreed that, except (1) as otherwise contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (2) as set forth in Magnachip’s confidential disclosure letter to the Merger Agreement, (3) to comply with any COVID-19 Measures, (4) as otherwise required by applicable law or policy or guidance from a governmental authority, (5) for any action (including cessation of activities) taken by Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries, after reasonable consultation with Parent, that Magnachip or such subsidiary reasonably believes is required in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the officers and employees of any of the Businesses and all other individuals having business dealings with any of the Businesses or (6) with the prior written consent of Parent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned, during the period of time between the date of this Merger Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time or the termination of the Merger Agreement pursuant to its terms, we will not, and will cause each of our subsidiaries not to, take any of the following actions:

99

100

Alternative Acquisition Proposals

From the date of the Merger Agreement until the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, Magnachip will not, and will cause each of our subsidiaries and certain representatives of our financial advisors (set forth in Magnachip’s confidential disclosure letter to the Merger Agreement) not to, and Magnachip will use our reasonable best efforts to cause our and our subsidiaries’ other representatives not to:

Notwithstanding these restrictions, under certain circumstances, prior to the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by our stockholders, we may provide access and non-public information to (provided that any material non-public information to be provided has previously been provided to Parent or is provided to Parent immediately thereafter), and participate in discussions and negotiations with, any third party from whom we receive a bona fide, unsolicited, written Takeover Proposal that is not withdrawn and did not result directly or indirectly from a material breach of any of the provisions of the Merger Agreement if (1) our Board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal and financial advisors that such Takeover Proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal, (2) our Board determines in good faith, after having taken into account the advice of our outside legal counsel, that the failure to take the foregoing actions would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations to our stockholders under applicable law and (3) at least 24 hours prior to taking any of the foregoing actions, Magnachip (A) gives Parent written notice of the identity of the person making such Takeover Proposal (to the extent not restricted by the terms of any confidentiality agreement in existence on the date of the Merger Agreement) and of our intention to furnish non-public information to, or enter into discussions or negotiations with, such person and (B) receives from such person, and delivers to Parent a copy of, an acceptable confidentiality agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Merger Agreement, no access or non-public information may be provided to, and discussions or negotiations may not be entered into (and no Takeover Proposal will be (or will be deemed to be) a Superior Proposal for any purpose under the Merger Agreement) unless and until (x) the person (or group of persons) making the applicable Takeover Proposal has permitted Magnachip (without liability) to provide Parent with the identity of such person (or group of persons), the material terms and conditions of such Takeover Proposal (and any modification or proposed modification thereto) and any documentation relating thereto and (y) Magnachip has provided such information and documentation to Parent.

We have agreed: (1) not to release or permit the release of any person from, or to amend, waive or permit the amendment or waiver of any provision of, any confidentiality or similar agreement or provision to which we or any of our subsidiaries is or becomes a party or under which we or any of our subsidiaries has any rights; and

101

(2) to use our reasonable best efforts to enforce or cause to be enforced each such agreement or provision at the request of Parent. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Merger Agreement, our Board may modify, waive, amend or release any existing standstill obligations owed by any person to the extent such standstill obligations would prohibit such person from making a Takeover Proposal privately to our Board in order to permit such person to make a Takeover Proposal privately to our Board, if our Board determines in good faith, after having taken into account the advice of our outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary obligations to our stockholders under applicable law.

We have agreed to advise Parent orally and in writing of (1) the receipt of any Takeover Proposal or any request for non-public information relating to us or any of our subsidiaries, specifying the material terms and conditions thereof and the identity of the party making such Takeover Proposal or request (to the extent not restricted by the terms of any confidentiality agreement in existence on the date hereof) and (2) any material modifications to the financial or other material terms and conditions of such Takeover Proposal, in each case within 24 hours after our receipt thereof and, if available, providing Parent with copies of any written documentation from such person or any of such person’s representatives setting forth the terms and conditions of, or otherwise relating to, such Takeover Proposal or request (in each case, which may be redacted for the identity of the person or group of persons making such Takeover Proposal or request to the extent restricted by the terms of any confidentiality agreement in existence on the date of the Merger Agreement). We have also agreed to keep Parent reasonably informed, on a reasonably current basis, with respect to the status of any such Takeover Proposal or request and any modification or proposed modification thereto, and to, within 24 hours after transmittal or receipt of any material correspondence or communication involving us and any of our subsidiaries or any of our respective representatives, on the one hand, and the person that made or submitted such Takeover Proposal or request, on the other hand, provide Parent with a copy thereof (which may be redacted for the identity of the person or group of persons making such modification or proposed modification to the extent restricted by the terms of any confidentiality agreement in existence on the date of the Merger Agreement).

We have agreed that (1) we will, and will cause our subsidiaries and certain representatives of our financial advisors (set forth in Magnachip’s confidential disclosure letter to the Merger Agreement) to, and will use our reasonable best efforts to cause our and our subsidiaries’ respective other representatives to, immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing discussions or negotiations with any person relating to any Takeover Proposal and (2) promptly after the date of the Merger Agreement, we will request each person that has executed a confidentiality or similar agreement within 12 months prior to the date of the Merger Agreement in connection with such person’s consideration of a possible Takeover Proposal or investment in Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries to return or destroy all confidential information previously furnished to such person by or on behalf of us or any of our subsidiaries.

Our Board’s Recommendation; Company Board Recommendation Change

As described above, and subject to the provisions described below, our Board has recommended that the holders of Company Common Stock vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and approve the Merger (the “Company Board Recommendation”). The Merger Agreement provides that our Board will not effect a Company Board Recommendation Change except as described below.

Except as permitted by the next two paragraphs, neither our Board nor any committee thereof will (1) withdraw, modify or amend the Company Board Recommendation in any manner adverse to Parent, (2) approve, endorse, accept, adopt or recommend, or declare the advisability of, a Takeover Proposal or (3) agree or publicly propose to take any of the foregoing actions (any action described in clauses (1), (2) or (3), a “Company Board Recommendation Change”).

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Merger Agreement, at any time before the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by our stockholders, our Board may, in response to an unsolicited, bona fide, written Superior Proposal received by our Board after the date of the Merger Agreement

102

that did not result directly or indirectly from a material breach of any of the provisions of the Merger Agreement, (x) effect a Company Board Recommendation Change with respect to such Superior Proposal or (y) authorize Magnachip to terminate the Merger Agreement to enter into an Alternative Acquisition Agreement, in each case, but only if:

In addition, our Board may also effect a Company Board Recommendation Change at any time before the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger by our stockholders, in response to an Intervening Event, but only if:

103

“Takeover Proposal” means any proposal or offer relating to (1) a merger, consolidation, spin-off, share exchange (including a split-off), reorganization, recapitalization, joint venture, tender or exchange offer, business combination or other similar transaction involving Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries (or assets thereof) representing 20% or more of the assets, revenue or net income of Magnachip and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (2) a sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, transfer, exclusive license or sublicense or other disposition, in a single transaction or series of related transactions, involving Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries (or assets thereof) representing 20% or more of the assets, revenue or net income of Magnachip and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (3) a purchase or sale of shares of capital stock or other securities, in a single transaction or series of related transactions, representing 20% or more of the voting power of the capital stock of Magnachip or our Korean subsidiary, including by way of a tender offer or exchange offer, (4) a liquidation or dissolution of Magnachip or our Korean subsidiary or (5) any other transaction or combination of transactions having a similar effect to those described in clauses (1) through (4) (in each case, other than any such transaction among Magnachip and any of our subsidiaries or among our subsidiaries and other than the Merger).

“Superior Proposal” means a Takeover Proposal which our Board determines, in consultation with its legal and financial advisors, (i) is on terms and conditions more favorable, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of Magnachip than those contemplated by the Merger Agreement and (ii) is reasonably likely to be consummated (if accepted). For purposes of the reference to “Takeover Proposal” in this definition, references in the definition of the term “Takeover Proposal” to the figure “20%” will be deemed to be replaced by “50%.”

“Intervening Event” means any material change, event, effect, occurrence, development, fact or circumstance in respect of Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries that arises after the date hereof and that was not known or reasonably foreseeable to our Board prior to the date of the Merger Agreement (other than (1) any change, event, effect, occurrence, development, fact or circumstance resulting from a breach of the Merger Agreement by Magnachip, any of our subsidiaries or any of our respective representatives, (2) any Takeover Proposal or (3) the fact that Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries exceeds any internal or published projections, estimates or expectations of revenue, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations in any period (however, the underlying reasons for such events may constitute an Intervening Event)).

Employees; Benefits Plans

For a period of three years following the closing date (the “Continuation Period”), Parent will not, and will cause the Surviving Corporation or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates not to, (1) terminate the engagement or employment of any individual who, immediately prior to the Effective Time, is an employee of Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries, including each individual on a permitted leave immediately prior to the Effective Time (each, an “Employee”), or take any adverse measures against any such Employee, including termination, suspension or demotion, in each case, other than for just cause as permitted under the Labor Standards Act of Korea (it being understood that Parent will not, and will cause the Surviving Corporation or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates not to, engage in compulsory layoffs, restructurings or early retirement of Employees for such period); (2) modify any terms of contract, engagement or employment existing as of the closing date in a manner adverse to the interests of any Employees, other than for just cause as permitted under the Labor Standards Act of Korea; (3) shut-down or close any factory or facility in which the Employees provide services; or (4) transfer the employment of any Employee to any affiliate of Parent without such Employee’s consent.

104

For the Continuation Period, Parent will, or will cause the Surviving Corporation or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates to, provide to each Employee (1) no less than the salary or hourly wage rate provided to such Employee immediately prior to the Effective Time, (2) no less than the short-term (annual or more frequent) bonus or commission opportunity provided to such Employee immediately prior to the Effective Time and (3) other compensation and benefits (excluding equity and equity-based awards which will remain discretionary) that are no less favorable in the aggregate, determined on an individual basis, than those provided to such Employee under the compensation and benefit plans, programs, policies, agreements and arrangements of Magnachip and its subsidiaries in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Merger Agreement, after the Effective Time, nothing therein will preclude the Surviving Corporation from terminating the employment of any Employee for any lawful reason.

During the Continuation Period, Parent will, or will cause the Surviving Corporation and each of their respective subsidiaries and affiliates to, honor all Company Benefit Plans in accordance with their terms as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time; provided, that nothing herein will prevent the amendment or termination of any specific plan, program, policy, agreement or arrangement in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof, or interfere with Parent’s, the Surviving Corporation’s or any of their respective affiliates’ rights or obligations to make such changes as are necessary to comply with applicable law. For all purposes under all employee benefit plans of Parent, the Surviving Corporation and their respective affiliates providing benefits to any Employee after the Effective Time, each Employee will receive full credit for the years of service credited to the Employee under the Company Benefit Plans before the Effective Time, to the same extent that such Employee was entitled, prior to the Effective Time, to credit for such service under any similar or comparable Company Benefit Plan (except to the extent such credit would result in a duplication of accrual of benefits and not for purposes of benefit accruals under any defined benefit pension plan or similar plan).

Nothing in the foregoing paragraphs, whether express or implied, will confer upon any current or former employee of Magnachip, Parent, the Surviving Corporation or any of their respective affiliates, any rights or remedies including any right to employment or continued employment for any specified period, of any nature or kind whatsoever under or by reason of the foregoing.

In addition to Parent’s obligations under the Merger Agreement with respect to employees and benefit plans as described above, it is our understanding that following the consummation of the Merger, Parent intends to cause Magnachip to (1) increase capital expenditures at our facility in Gumi, South Korea beyond the amounts currently planned by Magnachip’s management (and approved by our Board), (2) increase research and development resources in an effort to continue to grow and enhance the Businesses, and (3) provide an employee stock ownership plan for employees who, as determined by the chief executive officer and the board of directors, have contributed to, or are likely to or have demonstrated a commitment to contribute to, Magnachip’s ongoing success.

Efforts to Close the Merger

In the Merger Agreement, we and Parent have agreed to, and Parent has agreed to cause each of its affiliates to, use our respective reasonable best efforts to promptly (1) obtain any consents, approvals or other authorizations, and make any filings and notifications, required in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Required Competition Approval, (2) make any other submissions either required or deemed appropriate by both Parent and Magnachip in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under applicable law and (3) take or cause to be taken all other actions necessary, proper or advisable consistent with this efforts provision of the Merger Agreement to cause the expiration of the applicable waiting periods, or receipt of required consents, approvals or authorizations, as applicable, under any law, including the Required Competition Approval, as soon as reasonably practicable.

In addition, we and Parent have agreed to, and Parent has agreed to cause its affiliates to, (1) file and not withdraw, as promptly as practicable after the date of the Merger Agreement, any filings, notification forms,

105

applications, submissions, and related material required to be filed with any governmental authority or requested by any “Requesting Authority” (which means a governmental authority that requests, asserts or attempts to assert jurisdiction over, or requests, requires, or attempts to require from Parent, Magnachip and/or our Korean subsidiary a filing or submission related to, the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement), in each case with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and (2) promptly make any further filings or submissions pursuant thereto that may be necessary, proper or advisable. We and Parent have agreed not to, and have agreed to ensure that none of our respective affiliates, consent to any voluntary extension of any statutory deadline or waiting period or to any voluntary delay of any consent, approval or other authorization required for the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement at the behest of any governmental authority or Requesting Authority without the consent of the other party, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned (it being understood that if Parent determines to withdraw and refile any submission to any Requesting Authority, Magnachip will consent thereto).

We and Parent have also agreed to cooperate and consult with each other in connection with the making of all such filings, notifications, applications, and submissions, including by providing copies of all relevant documents (that are not privileged, confidential or proprietary) to the non-filing party and its advisors before filing. In addition, we and Parent have agreed to, and will cause our respective affiliates to, among other things, (1) promptly inform each other upon receipt of any communication from any governmental authority or Requesting Authority regarding any of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, (2) endeavor in good faith to make, or cause to be made, to the extent practicable and after consultation with the other party, an appropriate response to any request for additional information from a governmental authority or Requesting Authority (incorporating any comments of the other party in good faith), (3) not (i) voluntarily make any filing, application or other submission that is not directed or requested by a governmental authority or Requesting Authority or (ii) initiate any meeting or communication with any governmental authority or Requesting Authority, in each case, without the prior written consent of the other party (and if any filing, application or other submission is so made as mutually agreed between Parent and Magnachip, then the form and substance of any such filing, application or other submission shall be reasonably acceptable to Parent and Magnachip), (4) not participate in any meeting or engage in any substantive conversation with any governmental authority or Requesting Authority without giving the other party, to the extent legally permissible, prior notice of the meeting or substantive conversation and, unless prohibited by such governmental authority or Requesting Authority, the opportunity to attend or participate, (5) keep each other reasonably informed with respect to the status of any submissions and filings to any governmental authority or Requesting Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and any developments, meetings or substantive discussions with any governmental authority or Requesting Authority in respect thereof and (6) attempt to resolve any objections that may be asserted with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement under any antitrust, competition, trade or other law as promptly as practicable and advise each other promptly of any understandings, undertakings or agreements (oral or written) which the relevant party proposes to make or enter into with any governmental authority or Requesting Authority in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (it being understood, however, that Magnachip will not propose or enter into any such understanding, undertaking or agreement (oral or written) without the prior written consent of Parent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned).

In addition, Parent has agreed not to, and will not permit any of its affiliates to, take any action (including acquiring or making any investment in any person or any division or assets thereof) that would reasonably be expected to (1) result in a material delay in the satisfaction of any of the conditions to the closing of the Merger or any of such conditions not being satisfied, (2) impose or cause any material delay in the obtaining of, or materially increase the risk of not obtaining, any governmental authorization necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or the expiration or termination of any waiting period under applicable law or (3) result in any governmental authority entering an order prohibiting or enjoining the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

Subject to the following paragraph, Parent has agreed to take, and will cause its affiliates to take (and Magnachip and our affiliates will be permitted to take, without affecting any representation or warranty in the

106

Merger Agreement, but subject to the following paragraph and the last sentence of this paragraph), all action necessary to (1) cause the expiration of the applicable waiting periods, or receipt of required consents, approvals or authorizations, as applicable, under any laws, including the Required Competition Approval and (2) avoid the entry or to effect the dissolution of, or vacate or lift, any order or other requirement of a governmental authority which would otherwise have the effect of preventing, impairing or delaying the closing, including: (i) objecting to and resisting any regulatory action or direction that seeks to require a filing with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (except as contemplated under the Merger Agreement, including with respect to a Requesting Authority), (ii) selling, licensing, divesting or disposing of or holding separate any entities, assets, intellectual property or businesses (including, after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation or any of its subsidiaries), (iii) terminating, amending or assigning existing relationships or contractual rights and obligations, (iv) changing or modifying any course of conduct regarding future operations, (v) otherwise taking actions that would limit its freedom of action with respect to, or its ability to retain, one or more of their respective businesses, assets or rights or interests therein and (vi) committing to take any such actions in the foregoing clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (v). For the avoidance of doubt, Parent will not require Magnachip or our subsidiaries to take, and Magnachip and our subsidiaries will not be required to take, any action described in the preceding sentence that is not conditioned upon the consummation of the Merger. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Merger Agreement, neither Magnachip nor any of our subsidiaries or affiliates will take any action described in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v) or (vi) of the first sentence of this paragraph without the prior written consent of Parent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned.

However, notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with any filings, applications, or submissions required by applicable law or requested by a Requesting Authority with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, Parent (1) will be entitled to make such filings, applications and submissions and to respond to such requests and (2) except (i) with respect to the Required Competition Approval and (ii) in the case of any filings, applications or submissions required by applicable law in the PRC or the issuance or enactment of any order or law by the State Administration for Market Regulation in the PRC (solely in its capacity under the Anti-monopoly Law (China) on antitrust review of business concentrations) or the National People’s Congress of the PRC or its Standing Committee (in each of cases (i) and (ii), which, for the avoidance of doubt, will be subject to the immediately preceding paragraph without application of this paragraph), will not be required to (A) agree to, or accept or suffer to have imposed upon Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries (and, without Parent’s consent, none of Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries, prior to the closing, will agree to or accept or suffer to have imposed upon it), any condition or restriction relating to any of the assets, businesses or interests of Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries that would reasonably be expected to materially and adversely impact the assets, businesses or interests of any of the Businesses or of our Korean subsidiary or (B) agree to or accept any condition or restriction that would reasonably be expected to have the effect of materially limiting or materially restricting Parent’s ownership, conduct or operation of any of the Businesses or of our Korean subsidiary, following the closing (any of the foregoing conditions, restrictions or actions described in clauses (A) and (B), a “Burdensome Condition”). If Parent becomes aware of a Burdensome Condition, it must provide prompt notice thereof (and in any event within five days) to Magnachip.

Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification and Insurance

The Merger Agreement provides that for a period of at least six years from and after the Effective Time (or for a longer period if set forth in any indemnification agreement in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement), Parent and the Surviving Corporation will cause all rights to indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation now existing in favor of any present or former director, officer or employee of Magnachip or any of our subsidiaries and the fiduciaries of any Company Benefit Plan (the “Indemnified Parties”) as provided in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and comparable organizational or governing documents of our subsidiaries (as in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement) or in any written indemnification agreements (in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement) between an Indemnified Party and Magnachip or one of our subsidiaries, to survive the Merger and to continue in full force and effect.

107

Parent has also agreed to cause the Surviving Corporation to indemnify and hold harmless all Indemnified Parties to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law with respect to all acts and omissions arising out of or relating to their services as directors, officers or employees of Magnachip, our subsidiaries or another person, if such Indemnified Party is or was serving as a director, officer or employee of such other person at the request of Magnachip, or fiduciaries of the Company Benefit Plans, whether asserted or claimed at or after or occurring before the Effective Time (including in connection with the negotiation and execution of the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or otherwise). If any Indemnified Party is or becomes involved in any legal action in connection with any matter subject to indemnification hereunder, then Parent has agreed to cause the Surviving Corporation to advance as incurred any costs or expenses (including legal fees and disbursements), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages or liabilities (“Damages”) arising out of or incurred in connection with such legal action, subject to the Surviving Corporation’s receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such Indemnified Party to repay such Damages if it is ultimately determined under applicable law that such Indemnified Party is not entitled to be indemnified.

The Merger Agreement also provides that Parent and the Surviving Corporation will, jointly and severally, maintain in effect for at least six years after the Effective Time the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance maintained by Magnachip or policies of at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions which are no less advantageous with respect to claims arising out of or relating to events which occurred before or at the Effective Time (including in connection with the negotiation and execution of the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement) so long as Parent and the Surviving Corporation are not required to pay an annual premium in excess of 300% of the last annual premium paid by Magnachip for such insurance before the date of the Merger Agreement (such 300% amount being the “Maximum Premium”). If Parent or the Surviving Corporation are unable to obtain the insurance described in the prior sentence for an amount less than or equal to the Maximum Premium, then Parent and the Surviving Corporation will, jointly and severally, instead obtain as much comparable insurance as possible for an annual premium less than or equal to the Maximum Premium. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of the arrangements contemplated by this paragraph, before the Effective Time, Magnachip will be entitled to purchase (for no more than the Maximum Premium) a “tail” directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy covering the matters described in this paragraph and, if Magnachip elects to purchase such a policy before the Effective Time, then Parent and the Surviving Corporation’s obligations under this paragraph will be satisfied so long as Parent and the Surviving Corporation cause such policy to be maintained in effect for a period of six years following the Effective Time.

Other Covenants

The Merger Agreement contains other customary covenants, including, but not limited to, covenants relating to access to information, confidentiality, public announcements, transfer taxes, Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, NYSE de-listing, transaction litigation, agreements with principal stockholders and notices of certain events.

Conditions to the Closing of the Merger

Mutual Conditions to Parent’s and Magnachip’s Obligation to Effect the Merger

Each party’s respective obligation to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction, or to the extent permitted by law, waiver on or before the closing date of various conditions, including the following:

108

“Specified Governmental Authority” means any of the following: (i) any federal governmental authority from the United States, (ii) any national governmental authority from the Republic of Korea, (iii) the State Administration for Market Regulation in the PRC solely in its capacity under the Anti-monopoly Law (China) on antitrust review of business concentrations and (iv) for purposes of the Prohibitive Order Condition and the Prohibitive Order Termination Right (described under the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination of the Merger Agreement” beginning on page 110 of this proxy statement), the National People’s Congress of the PRC or its Standing Committee.

Conditions to Parent’s Obligation to Effect the Merger

In addition, Parent and Merger Sub are not obligated to effect the Merger unless the following conditions are satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived by Parent on or before the closing date:

Conditions to Magnachip’s Obligation to Effect the Merger

Further, we are not obligated to effect the Merger unless the following conditions are satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived by us on or before the closing date:

109

Neither Magnachip nor Parent and Merger Sub may rely, either as a basis for not consummating the Merger or for terminating the Merger Agreement and abandoning the Merger, on the failure of any of the preceding conditions listed in this section to be satisfied if such party’s breach of any provision of the Merger Agreement was the primary cause of such failure.

The obligation of Parent and Merger Sub to consummate the Merger is not subject to any financing condition.

Termination of the Merger Agreement

The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time before the Effective Time:

110

With respect to the first bullet, a “Specified Circumstance” will be deemed to exist if: (1) the Regulatory Approval Condition with respect to the approval, consent or authorization of any governmental authority identified in clause (i) or (ii) of the definition of “Specified Governmental Authority” is not satisfied and has not, to the extent permitted by Law, been waived; or (2) as a result of a challenge by a governmental authority identified in clause (i) or (ii) of the definition of “Specified Governmental Authority,” the Prohibitive Order Condition with respect to the absence of a Prohibitive Order issued or enacted by any governmental authority identified in clause (i) or (ii) of the definition of “Specified Governmental Authority” is not satisfied and has not, to the extent permitted by law, been waived.

111

In the event of termination of the Merger Agreement, the Merger Agreement will immediately become void and have no effect, without any liability or obligation on the part of Parent, Merger Sub or Magnachip (or any Parent Related Party or Company Related Party (each as defined in the Merger Agreement)) other than as provided in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees” beginning on page 113 of this proxy statement; provided, that the Confidentiality Agreements, the Equity Commitment Letter and the Standby Letter of Credit will survive the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with their respective terms, as will certain provisions of the Merger Agreement, including terms relating to termination fees.

112

Termination Fees

Termination Fee Payable by Magnachip

We will be required to pay Parent a “Company Termination Fee” equal to $42,100,000 (as may be increased to include interest, costs and expenses as described in the section captioned “The Merger Agreement—Termination Fees—Interest, Costs and Expenses” beginning on page 115 of this proxy statement) in the following circumstances: