SEC Filing | Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Form 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

x	Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number 333-126019-09

MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR LLC

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		83-0406195
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

c/o MagnaChip Semiconductor S.A. 74, rue de Merl, B.P. 709, L-2017 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg		Not Applicable
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (352) 45-62-62

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes x No ¨

Note—Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨		Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Not applicable.

As of March 1, 2007, the registrant had 52,720,784.047 of the registrant’s common units outstanding.

Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.

No annual report or proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material with respect to any annual or other meeting of security holders has been sent to security holders.

MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR LLC

2006 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	PART I

Item 1	Business	2

Item 1A	Risk Factors	10

Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	16

Item 2	Properties	16

Item 3	Legal Proceedings	17

Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	17

	PART II

Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	18

Item 6	Selected Financial Data	19

Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21

Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	34

Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	35

Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	76

Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	76

Item 9B	Other Information	77

	PART III

Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	78

Item 11	Executive Compensation	81

Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	92

Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	96

Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	97

	PART IV

Item 15	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	98

SIGNATURES		104

PART I

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

In this report, we rely on and refer to information regarding the semiconductor market from iSuppli, DisplaySearch, and other third-party sources. Market data attributed to iSuppli are from “CCD and CMOS Image Sensors: Handset Market Driving the Industry, Consumer Platforms Topical Report—Q4 2006” dated October 2005, “Pure Play Foundry Market Tracker—H2 2006,” and “Much Room for Growth Before Display Driver Market Matures: Display Driver ICs Market Tracker—Q4 2006.” Market data attributed to DisplaySearch are from “Quarterly Global TV Shipment & Forecast Data Tables—Q4 2006,” “Quarterly Desktop MNT Shipment & Forecast Data Tables—Q4 2006,” and “Quarterly NBPC Shipment & Forecast Data Table—Q4 2006.” Although we believe that this information is reliable, we cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the information and have not independently verified it. As a result, you should be aware that market and other similar data set forth herein, and estimates and beliefs based on such data, may not be reliable. We do not have any obligation to announce or otherwise make publicly available updates or revisions to these forecasts. In many cases, we have made statements in this report regarding our industry and our position in the industry based on our experience in the industry and our own investigation of market conditions. We cannot assure you that any of these assumptions are accurate or that our assumptions correctly reflect our position in our industry.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements represent expectations or beliefs of ours concerning future events, and no assurance can be given that the results described in this report will be achieved. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “may,” “will,” “should” or other similar words or phrases. All forward-looking statements are based upon information available to us on the date of this report.

These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including, among other things, the matters discussed in this report in the sections captioned: “Business,” “Risk factors” and “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations.” There may be other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf apply only as of the date of this report and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this report which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

“MagnaChip” and “IC Media” are our trademarks and trade names. All other trademarks, trade names, and service marks appearing in this report are the property of their respective owners.

Item 1. Business.

BUSINESS

Overview

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (“MagnaChip” or the “Company”) is a leading designer, developer and manufacturer of mixed-signal and digital multimedia semiconductors addressing the convergence of consumer electronics and communications devices. We focus on Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor (“CMOS”) image sensors and flat panel display drivers, which are complex, high-performance mixed-signal semiconductors that capture and display images and enable and enhance the features and capabilities of both small and large flat panel displays. Our solutions are used in a wide variety of consumer and commercial mass market applications, such as mobile handsets, including camera-equipped mobile handsets, flat panel monitors and televisions, consumer home and mobile displays, portable and desktop computer displays, handheld gaming devices, PDAs and audio-visual equipment such as DVD players. We serve consumer markets that we believe will have higher growth rates than those of the overall semiconductor industry.

We manufacture our products using our proprietary process technology, which we believe provides our products with cost advantages over those of our competitors. We have approximately 8,500 registered and pending patents. We believe that our proprietary in-house CMOS image sensor technology allows us to tailor our process to create brighter, sharper, more colorful picture quality in image-capture applications such as camera-equipped mobile handsets. Our flat panel display drivers enable our customers to deliver higher image quality, thinner and more power-efficient small panel displays for use in mobile handsets, handheld gaming devices and PDAs and large panel displays for use in portable and desktop computer monitors and digital televisions. We are also a leading provider of wafer foundry services whereby we leverage our specialized process technologies and low cost manufacturing facilities to produce semiconductors for third parties using their product designs.

We own and operate five wafer fabrication facilities, or fabs, which have a combined production capacity of over 119,000 eight-inch equivalent wafers per month. Our fabs provide us with large-scale, cost-effective and flexible capacity, enabling us to rapidly scale to high volume to meet shifts in demand by our end customers. Our fabs also provide us with the ability to further develop our differentiated process technologies for our own product development and manufacturing. The location of our manufacturing sites in Korea and research and development resources in Korea, Japan, and the United States provide close geographical proximity to many of our largest customers and to the core of the worldwide consumer electronics supply chain.

We sell our solutions to leading original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, which include major branded customers as well as contract manufacturers. Our CMOS image sensors are currently designed into products offered by leading global mobile handset manufacturers. Our flat panel display drivers are currently incorporated into products offered by top flat panel display manufacturers. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we sold over 2,200 products to more than 240 customers.

In the three-month period ended December 31, 2004, and the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005, and December 31, 2006, we derived respectively 23.9%, 17.4%, and 8.1% of our consolidated revenue from CMOS image sensors, 24.8%, 34.8%, and 36.8% from flat panel display drivers, and 36.2%, 36.8%, and 46.0% from semiconductor manufacturing services.

The Original Acquisition

Our business was named MagnaChip Semiconductor when it was acquired from Hynix Semiconductor Inc. on October 6, 2004, by Citigroup Venture Capital Equity Partners, L.P. (now known as Court Square Capital Partners, but referred to herein as “CVC”), Francisco Partners L.P., or “Francisco Partners,” CVC Asia Pacific Limited, or “CVC Asia Pacific,” certain members of management and other investors, following discussions with

Hynix that began in late 2001 and the execution of a definitive agreement in June 2004. Previously, we were the System IC division within Hynix which, in 1999, had been formed from the Hyundai Electronics and LG Semiconductor System IC businesses and can trace its history back to the late 1970s. We refer to the acquisition transaction, including the related definitive agreements with Hynix, as the “Original Acquisition.”

Divestment of Application Processor Business

On January 31, 2006, we completed the sale of our application processor business to ABOV Semiconductor Co., Ltd., a new independent entity formed by the investors in GreenChips Co., Ltd., a Korean semiconductor solution provider. The application processor business primarily included assets, staff, and intellectual property related to MagnaChip’s 8-bit and 32-bit microcontroller, SmartCard controller, microperipheral IC, and linear IC product lines. MagnaChip retained a 2.3% equity stake in the new entity, and our semiconductor manufacturing services business continues to provide wafer foundry services for ABOV Semiconductor.

Competitive Strengths

We believe that our competitive strengths include:

Leading Technology and Intellectual Property. We believe our advanced process technology and portfolio of approximately 8,500 registered and pending patents provide us with key competitive advantages in the following areas:

CMOS image sensors: Our CMOS image sensors feature low power consumption and currently up to 3.2 megapixel resolution with auto-focus and auto-zoom options; features which provide important benefits to products incorporating our solutions, including increased battery life, enhanced image quality and ease of use.

Flat panel display drivers: We believe that our flat panel display drivers offer superior performance in shaping image signals and transmitting those signals to flat panel displays. These technical features result in sharper, brighter and higher-quality colored images in our customers’ end products. Furthermore, we believe that our flat panel display drivers enable thinner and more power-efficient flat panels that are easily integrated by our customers into their products.

Semiconductor manufacturing services: We have developed high-voltage, analog power and embedded memory specialty manufacturing process technologies that enable us to manufacture differentiated, high performance integrated semiconductor devices. For example, we developed the first high-voltage, high- performance CMOS 0.18 µm process, which enables us to manufacture more integrated, and thus smaller and more cost-efficient, semiconductor products. We believe that our proprietary process technology allows us to meet a wide variety of the specialty semiconductor manufacturing needs of our customers.

Flexible In-House Manufacturing. Our in-house wafer manufacturing capacity allows us to provide dependable delivery and quality of integrated semiconductor products to our customers. We have the ability to ramp quickly to high volumes to meet the variable needs of our customers. We have significant wafer manufacturing capacity as a result of our former parent’s investments in our wafer fabrication facilities. Because we offer specialty process technologies that do not require expensive investment in leading edge smaller geometry process equipment, we are able to keep our capital expenditures relatively low.

Significant Cost Advantages. We maintain price competitiveness on our products through our low cost operating structure. The Asian location of our primary manufacturing and research and development facilities provides us with a number of cost advantages relative to operating in other regions in the world. Additionally, we believe that our history of competing in the highly cost-sensitive markets in which we operated when we were a unit of Hynix required us to refine our manufacturing processes for optimal cost efficiency.

Established Relationships With Key Consumer Electronics OEMs. Our long history of operating in Asia and our proximity to leading communications and consumer OEMs facilitate our close customer relationships with

leading innovators in the consumer electronics market. We have active local applications and engineering work support programs for our customers and collaborate closely with our customers in the design and manufacturing of their products.

Significant Management and Board Expertise. Our management and Board of Directors have significant previous experience with advanced semiconductor companies both in Asia and worldwide. Our executives have many years of experience at such leading companies as Hynix, Samsung, Fairchild Semiconductor, and ChipPAC. In addition, two of our equity sponsors, CVC and Francisco Partners, have a long history of investments in semiconductor companies. We believe that their understanding of semiconductor system solutions, relationships, and credibility with key customers provides us with a key competitive advantage.

Business Strategy

Our goal is to build upon our position as a leading provider of mixed-signal and digital multimedia semiconductors addressing the convergence of consumer electronics and communications devices. Our business strategy emphasizes the following key elements:

Leverage Our Substantial Intellectual Property. We intend to use our broad patent portfolio and specific end market expertise to deliver system-level products with higher levels of integration and performance to customers in our existing and new markets. In CMOS image sensors, we intend to leverage our strong pixel design and manufacturing expertise to introduce higher resolution, more integrated and cost-effective solutions for camera-equipped mobile handsets and to penetrate emerging applications for image sensors in the automotive, medical and industrial markets over time. In flat panel display drivers, we intend to leverage our broad library of circuit building blocks, our embedded memory capabilities, our understanding of the major flat panel display types and our process technology to continue to reduce time to market and introduce new products that enhance image quality and operate with greater power efficiency. Our manufacturing process expertise and related intellectual property underlies and supports many of the advances in our technology.

Strengthen Collaboration With Key Customers. We intend to continue strengthening and deepening relationships with our key customers by collaborating on critical design and product development roadmaps. We believe such collaborative relationships will solidify our position with our customers, further our competitive differentiation and accelerate our drive for deeper customer and new market penetration. For example, close collaboration with our mobile handset customers has allowed us to deliver improved interfaces between baseband and image processors, which have resulted in solutions with smaller form factors and improved image quality.

Increase Large Account Penetration. We have a global customer base consisting of leading consumer electronics OEMs and contract manufacturers. Many of our customers have multiple product variations that use image-capture and processing. We will seek to increase our customer penetration by taking advantage of our broad product portfolio and existing relationships to cross-sell existing products to our customers and to penetrate product variations where our solutions are currently not used.

Broaden Our Customer Base. We intend to expand our customer base across various applications and geographic locations by leveraging our position as a supplier to many of the largest global consumer electronics companies and delivering to potential customers proven, innovative solutions. We also believe that as consumer electronics and communications applications converge and proliferate, we will increasingly have opportunities to sell our products into new markets such as the automotive, medical and industrial markets. We also intend to expand our global sales presence to penetrate new accounts worldwide and grow existing account relationships. We will leverage our sales representatives and distributors located throughout Asia, the United States, and Europe to further these goals.

Leverage Our Capital Light Business Model. We acquired significant proprietary process technologies and wafer manufacturing capacity from our former parent, Hynix. We intend to leverage these investments made by

Hynix to drive our growth and margin improvement. Furthermore, we plan to continue to keep our capital expenditures relatively low by maintaining our focus on specialty process technologies that do not require expensive investment in leading edge technologies. If needed, we will access other foundries that provide such technology in the future. We believe this approach will lead to a higher return on invested capital.

Products and Services

We have a balanced portfolio of products that address many of the most rapidly growing consumer electronics markets. We have determined, based on the nature of our operations and products offered to customers, that our reportable segments are Imaging Solutions, Display Solutions, and Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. The Imaging Solutions segment’s primary products are CMOS image sensors, and the Display Solutions segment’s primary products are flat panel display drivers. The Semiconductor Manufacturing Service segment provides wafer foundry services to clients.

Imaging Solutions. Our highly integrated image sensors are designed to be cost effective and to provide brighter, sharper, more colorful and, thus enhanced, image quality for use primarily in applications that require small form factors, low power consumption, effective heat dissipation and high reliability. Our image sensors fully satisfy these key criteria and are used in image capture applications such as camera-equipped mobile handsets and personal computer cameras. Our in-house manufacturing capabilities enable us to continuously fine tune our CMOS process technology to deliver improved image-capture sensitivity and accuracy.

CMOS image sensors are typically less expensive to produce and consume less power than other types of image sensors. Historically, CMOS image sensors were primarily used for low-cost applications for which high-image quality was not a priority. Recently, advances in semiconductor manufacturing processes and design techniques have led to improvements in CMOS image sensor performance and quality. As a result, CMOS image sensors have become useful, relatively low-cost solutions for use in applications such as camera-equipped mobile handsets and PDAs, where high-image quality, low power consumption, small size and low-cost are important considerations.

According to iSuppli, total worldwide image sensor revenue is expected to grow from $6.56 billion to $9.146 billion from 2006 to 2010, while unit shipments for area sensors such as our products will grow from 919 million units in 2006 to 1.538 billion units in 2010. Image sensor revenues for wireless electronics are forecasted by iSuppli to grow from 29% of the total revenue in 2006 to 64% by 2010. Conversely, revenues for consumer electronics will drop from 45% to 18% of the total market. Handsets accounted for 70% of all image sensor unit shipments in 2005 and will increase at a compound annual growth rate of 20% to account for 77% of all sensor shipments by 2010. Importantly, sensors for digital still cameras will only increase at a 5.8% compound annual growth rate from 98 million units in 2005, or 14.5% of the total, to 130 million units in 2010, or 8.4% of the total.

Our CMOS image sensors are characterized by a high level of integration. Many CMOS image sensors systems are made up of at least two integrated circuits: the CMOS image sensor itself and a separate image signal processor, or ISP. With the continuing demand for ever smaller camera-enabled devices, small size has become an increasingly important consideration for manufacturers of camera phones and similar products. Our products meet this demand for smaller form factors by integrating both our proprietary image sensor and image signal processor onto a single chip, thus occupying approximately half of the space required by multiple chip solutions, while providing equivalent or even superior image quality with lower power consumption and a lower overall cost.

We offer CMOS image sensors with resolutions of VGA, 1.0MP (megapixels), 1.3MP, 2.1MP and 3.2MP. Our solutions enable small form factor camera module implementations which are required for today’s demanding industrial designs, such as very thin mobile phones. All of our solutions support both video and still capture modes, and provide sub-sampling modes to enable preview modes of operation with reduced power

consumption. The choice of resolution by an OEM customer may involve many factors such as size, power and cost target. By offering a full line of solutions, we can service our customer’s requirements across the multiple end products they may offer.

Our imaging solutions segment received revenues of $60.5 million and had a gross loss of $4.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, revenues and gross profit of $163.3 million and $25.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, and revenues and gross profit of $58.1 million and $12.7 million during the three-month period ended December 31, 2004.

Display Solutions. Our flat panel display driver solutions are used in a wide variety of displays for mass market and commercial applications such as mobile handsets, handheld gaming devices, PDAs, displays for desktop and mobile computer monitors and flat panel televisions. We produce highly integrated flat panel display driver solutions and have pioneered developments in embedded memory and in the design and manufacturing of display drivers, enabling our customers to provide improved picture quality through thinner, smaller, more power-efficient displays.

Display drivers are the critical semiconductor components that enable the display’s functionality. A display driver operates by interfacing with the host processor to generate the precise analog voltages and currents required to create images on the display. The performance characteristics of a display driver are critical to the quality and visual appeal of the images and text generated on the display and, in mobile devices, the power efficiency of the device. Our display drivers are highly integrated semiconductors that are customized for the particular needs of our customers. We believe that our design engineering expertise, technology leadership, manufacturing process expertise and library of functional building blocks produce display drivers that enable a wide variety of display types with high-impact visual performance.

The overall end market for flat panel display drivers is composed of a multitude of consumer electronics device markets such as television, laptop and desktop computers and portable consumer devices, including mobile handsets. This overall market can be broken down into several distinct sub-markets which we serve. These sub-markets include large panel TFTs, typically used in flat panel televisions and computer displays, small panel TFTs, typically used in mobile handsets, OLEDs and Color STNs. iSuppli forecasts in the Display Driver ICs Market Tracker that small and medium flat panel display producer shipments will increase from approximately 1.897 billion units in 2006 to 2.226 billion units by 2010, a compound annual growth rate of 4.1%. DisplaySearch forecasts the large TFT LCD market size to increase from 258 million units and $96 billion revenue in 2006 to 462 million units and $138 billion revenue in 2010, a compound annual growth rate of 16%.

We provide display drivers for use in several different types of display technologies and for a variety of end-market applications as discussed below.

TFT-LCD. TFT is an advanced active matrix LCD technology that uses a matrix of transistors embedded on a thin film of silicon to change the transparency of the LCD when voltage is applied. TFT-LCD technology is currently widely used for notebook computers and large scale flat panel monitors (Large TFT) as well as for displays for high-end mobile devices such as advanced mobile handsets (Small TFT). We currently provide Large TFT display drivers for use in mobile and desktop computer displays and in stand-alone flat panel television displays. We also provide Small TFT display drivers for use in mobile handsets, PDAs and in other consumer devices such as handheld gaming devices.

Color STN. Color STN is a low-power, low-cost solution based on passive matrix LCD technology and is widely used in color mobile displays available in the market today. Our Color STN display drivers are used in mobile applications such as mobile handsets, PDAs and handheld gaming devices.

Organic Light Emitting Diode or OLED. OLED is a relatively new display technology used in both mobile displays as well as in larger displays. OLED technology provides enhanced picture quality, low power consumption and long product life; it also has fast image response time, making it an ideal solution

for displaying motion pictures on mobile devices. We currently offer display drivers for OLED displays used in mobile handsets and other mobile devices.

Our display solutions segment received revenues of $273.7 million and gross profit of $35.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, $326.1 million and $66.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, and $60.3 million and $4.5 million during the three-month period ended December 31, 2004.

Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. We provide semiconductor manufacturing services primarily to semiconductor companies that do not have their own fabs. We target the market for diversified semiconductor products that require differentiated specialty process technologies for their manufacture, including high-voltage CMOS, non-volatile memory processes, power, analog and mixed-signal processes. We focus on specialty process technologies that do not require significant recurring capital investment, and we are able to better differentiate ourselves through the depth of our intellectual property portfolio and process technology skills.

The increasing trend toward the outsourcing of semiconductor manufacturing has resulted in a rapid increase in the size of this market. According to iSuppli, the worldwide foundry service market is projected to grow from in excess of $26.6 billion in 2006 to $44.3 billion in 2010, a compound annual growth rate of 13.6%.

Typical applications serviced by our semiconductor manufacturing services business are high-voltage, analog and mixed-signal, power, and non-volatile memory products for consumer, data processing, mobile, game and data communication end-markets. We have developed specialty manufacturing process technologies that enable us to manufacture differentiated, high-performance integrated semiconductor devices. For example, we developed a distinctive high-voltage, high-performance CMOS 0.18 µm process that enables us to manufacture more integrated, and thus smaller and more cost efficient, semiconductor products. We believe that our proprietary process technology allows us to meet a wide variety of the specialty semiconductor manufacturing needs of our customers.

Our internal wafer fab facilities serve both our in-house product design groups and external foundry customers, allowing for both specialty process technology expertise and flexible manufacturing capacity. We target to be the primary-source provider of semiconductor manufacturing services for specialty process technologies for our foundry customers.

Our semiconductor manufacturing services segment received revenues of $342.4 million and gross profit of $45.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2006, $345.4 million and $110.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2005, and $88.3 million and $19.1 million during the three-month period ended December 31, 2004.

Customers

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we sold over 2,200 products to more than 240 customers. In the year ended December 31, 2006, our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 65.6% of our net sales, and we had one customer, a group of LG affiliates including LG.Philips LCD, representing greater than 10% of our net sales. See “Risk Factors—A significant portion of our sales comes from a relatively limited number of customers.”

Revenue classified by geography is determined by the headquarters locations of our customers. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we received revenues of $62.3 million from external customers in the United States and $682.0 million from all foreign countries, of which 60.7% was from Korea, 11.5% from Japan, 17.4% from Taiwan, and 7.5% from China, Hong Kong, and Macau. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we received revenues of $45.5 million from external customers in the United States and $892.2 million from all foreign countries, of which 57.4% was from Korea, 11.0% from Japan, 16.0% from Taiwan, and 11.8% from China, Hong Kong, and Macau. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2004, we received revenues of $9.3 million from external customers in the United States and $234.3 million from all foreign countries, of

which 54.3% was from Korea, 16.2% from Japan, 12.8% from Taiwan, and 13.5% from China, Hong Kong, and Macau.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

We sell our products through a direct sales force and a network of authorized agents and distributors. We have strategically located our sales and technical support offices near concentrations of major customers. Our direct sales force consists primarily of representatives located in our headquarters in Korea, as well as representatives located elsewhere throughout Asia, the United States, and Europe. Our network of authorized agents and distributors consists of agents in the United States and Europe and distributors and agents in the Asia Pacific region. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we derived approximately 74% of net sales through our direct sales force and 26% of net sales through our network of authorized agents and distributors.

Our product inventory is primarily located in Korea and is available for drop shipment globally. Outside of Korea, we maintain limited amounts of product inventory, and our sales representatives generally relay orders to our headquarters for fulfillment. Our agreements with our authorized agents and distributors are usually terminable by either party on relatively short notice.

Research and Development

Our expenditures for research and development were $131.2 million, representing 17.6% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006, $107.6 million, representing 11.5% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005, and $97.8 million, representing 9.0% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our research and development efforts focus on process technology, design methodology and intellectual property for our semiconductor products and foundry services. As a result, we have implemented improvements to our manufacturing processes, design software and design libraries, including our 0.15 µm high-voltage process and our 0.13 µm CIS process and library. We also work closely with our major customers in many research and development activities, including joint intellectual property development, to increase the likelihood that our products will be more easily designed into the customers’ products and consequently achieve rapid and lasting market acceptance. In CMOS image sensors, we are focusing on pixel size reduction, thereby enabling smaller form factors and higher resolution sensors. In flat panel display drivers, we are focusing on further integration. In semiconductor manufacturing services, our research and development work allows us to add features such as mixed-signal, high voltage, embedded memory and power devices.

Raw Materials

We use processes that require specialized raw materials that are generally available from a limited number of suppliers. In 2006, we diversified suppliers for many of our raw materials, including chemicals, gases, and tape, which is one of the process materials for our display drivers. We continue to attempt to qualify additional suppliers for these materials. Although we have not experienced any significant raw material shortages in the past, it is possible that going forward our business and results of operations could be adversely affected due to supply shortages or price increases for raw materials.

Worldwide supplies of silicon wafers, an important raw material for the semiconductors we manufacture, have been decreasing due to a worldwide shortage of polysilicon, the raw material of wafers, and are not expected to increase until late 2008. Polysilicon is also a key raw material for solar cells, the demand for which has steadily increased over the last two years.

Intellectual Property

As of March 1, 2007, our portfolio of intellectual property assets included approximately 8,500 registered and pending patents. Our patents expire at various times over the next 18 years. While these patents are in the aggregate important to our competitive position, no single registered or pending patent is material to us.

Pursuant to the intellectual property license agreement that we entered into with Hynix in connection with the Original Acquisition, we obtained from Hynix a non-exclusive license to certain intellectual property of Hynix that is mostly patent-related, and we granted to Hynix a non-exclusive license to certain of our intellectual property. Additionally, we have entered into exclusive and non-exclusive licenses and development agreements with third parties relating to the use of intellectual property of the third parties in our products and our design processes, including licenses related to embedded memory technology, design tools, process simulation tools, circuit designs, and ARM’s ARM7 and ARM9 core-based System-on-Chip.

In addition, we rely on proprietary know-how, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop products and maintain our competitive position. We attempt to protect our proprietary know-how and our other trade secrets by executing, when appropriate, confidentiality agreements with our customers and employees. We cannot assure you that our competitors will not discover comparable or the same knowledge and techniques through independent development or other means.

Competition

We operate in highly competitive markets. Although no one company competes with us in all of our product lines, we face significant competition in each of our market segments.

Our competitors include other manufacturers and designers of system semiconductors, standard products, and semi-standard programmable digital logic semiconductor products, as well as customers who design their own semiconductors that are manufactured at third party foundries.

We compete with other semiconductor providers based on design experience, the ability to service customer needs from the design phase to the shipping of a completed product, length of design cycle, longevity of technology support and sales and technical support personnel. Our ability to successfully compete depends on internal and external variables, both within and outside of our control. These variables include, but are not limited to, the timeliness with which we can develop new products and technologies, product performance and quality, manufacturing yields and availability, customer service, pricing, industry trends and general economic trends.

Employees

Our worldwide workforce consisted of 3,504 employees (full- and part-time) as of March 1, 2007, of which 455 were involved in sales, general and administrative, 485 were in research and development, 92 were in quality, reliability and assurance and 2,472 were in manufacturing (comprised of 401 in engineering and 2,071 in operations). As of March 1, 2007, 2,149 employees, or approximately 61% of our workforce, were represented by the MagnaChip Semiconductor Labor Union, which is a member of the Federation of Korean Metal Workers Trade Unions.

Currently, members of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU), representing the former employees of two subcontractors that we retained for only three months in 2004, have demonstrated and may continue to demonstrate at our campus in Cheongju, Korea. The KCTU is demanding that we pressure other subcontractors to hire the employees and that we pay monetary compensation to the employees. These demonstrations have required additional interim expenses and may have a continuing negative impact on our operations in the future.

Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate, governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, use, handling, storage and disposal of, and exposure to, hazardous substances (including asbestos)

and wastes, soil and groundwater contamination and employee health and safety. These laws and regulations are complex, constantly changing and have tended to become more stringent over time. We cannot assure you that we have been, or will be at all times, in complete compliance with all these laws and regulations or that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with these laws and regulations in the future. The adoption of new environmental, health and safety laws, the failure to comply with new or existing laws, or issues relating to hazardous substances could subject us to material liability (including substantial fines or penalties), impose the need for additional capital equipment or other process requirements upon us, curtail our operations, or restrict our ability to expand operations.

For More Information

We file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, including any amendments to these reports, are available on our website at www.magnachip.com. The public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. For information on the operation of the Public Reference Room, please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry may limit our ability to maintain or increase net sales and profit levels during industry downturns.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and periodically experiences significant economic downturns characterized by diminished product demand, resulting in production overcapacity and excess inventory in the markets we serve, which can result in rapid erosion of average selling prices. The industry has experienced significant downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles of both semiconductor companies’ and their customers’ products and the decline in general economic conditions.

We have experienced these conditions in our business in the past and may experience renewed, and possibly more severe and prolonged, downturns in the future as a result of such cyclical changes. This may reduce our profitability and the value of our business.

Customer demand is difficult to accurately forecast.

We make significant decisions, including determining the levels of business that we will seek and accept, production schedules, component procurement commitments, personnel needs and other resource requirements, based on our estimates of customer requirements. The short-term nature of commitments by many of our customers and the possibility of rapid changes in demand for their products reduces our ability to accurately estimate future customer demand. On occasion, customers may require rapid increases in production, which can challenge our resources and reduce margins. We may not have sufficient capacity at any given time to meet our customers’ increased demand for our product. Conversely, downturns in the semiconductor industry may cause and have caused our customers to significantly reduce the amount of products ordered from us. Because many of our costs and operating expenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in customer demand may decrease our gross margins and operating income.

Our customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities or delay production.

We generally do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers. Customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities or delay production for a number of reasons. Cancellations, reductions or delays by a significant customer or by a group of customers, which we have experienced as a result of the recent downturn in the semiconductor industry, have adversely affected and may continue to adversely

affect our results of operations. In addition, while we do not obtain long-term purchase commitments, we generally agree to the pricing of a particular product for the entire lifecycle of the product, which can extend over a number of years. If we underestimate our costs when determining the pricing, our margins and results of operations would be adversely affected.

A significant portion of our sales comes from a relatively limited number of customers.

If we were to lose key customers or if customers cease to place orders for our high volume devices, our financial results will be adversely affected. While we served more than 240 customers in the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2006, net sales to our 10 largest customers represented approximately 65.6% of our net sales for the period. We had one individual customer and one group of affiliated customers that each represented greater than 10% of our net sales during the year ended December 31, 2006. Significant reductions in sales to any of these customers, the loss of major customers or the curtailment of orders for our high-volume devices within a short period of time would adversely affect our business.

Our industry is highly competitive.

The semiconductor industry is highly competitive and includes hundreds of companies, a number of which have achieved substantial market share. Current and prospective customers for our products evaluate our capabilities against the merits of our direct competitors. Some of our competitors are well-established as independent companies and have substantially greater market share and manufacturing, financial, research and development and marketing resources than we do. We also compete with emerging companies that are attempting to sell their products in specialized markets, and with the internal capabilities of many of our significant customers. We expect to experience continuing competitive pressures in our markets from existing competitors and new entrants. Any consolidation among our competitors could enhance their product offerings and financial resources, further enhancing their competitive position. Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including the following: our ability to offer cost effective products on a timely basis using our technologies; our ability to accurately identify and respond to emerging technological trends and demand for product features and performance characteristics; product introductions by our competitors; our ability to adopt or adapt to emerging industry standards; and the number and nature of our competitors in a given market. Many of these factors are outside of our control. In the future, our competitors may capture our existing or potential customers and our customers may satisfy more of their requirements internally. As a result, we may experience declining revenues and profits.

A decline in average selling prices could decrease our profits.

In the past, our industry has experienced a decline in average selling prices. A decline in average selling prices for our products, if not offset by reductions in the costs of producing such products, would decrease our gross profits and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Growth in the consumer electronics and other end markets for our products is an important component in our success.

Our continued success will depend in part on the growth of various consumer electronics markets and other end markets that use our semiconductors and on general economic growth. To the extent that we cannot offset recessionary periods or periods of reduced growth that may occur in these markets through greater penetration of these markets, our sales may decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer as a result.

We depend on successful technological advances for growth.

Our industry is subject to rapid technological change and product obsolescence as customers and competitors create new and innovative products and technologies. Products or technologies developed by other

companies may render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive and we may not be able to access leading edge process technologies or to license or otherwise obtain essential intellectual property required by our customers. Our inability to continue identifying new product opportunities, or manufacturing technologically advanced products on a cost-effective basis, may result in decreased revenues and a loss of market share to our competitors.

We may not be able to attract or retain the technical or management employees necessary to remain competitive in our industry.

We depend on our ability to attract and retain skilled technical and managerial personnel. We could lose the services of, or fail to recruit, skilled personnel, which could hinder our research and product development programs or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we encounter future labor problems, we may fail to deliver our products in a timely manner which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

As of March 1, 2007, approximately 61% of our employees were represented by the MagnaChip Semiconductor Labor Union, which is a member of the Federation of Korean Metal Workers Trade Unions. We cannot assure you that issues with the labor union and other employees will be resolved favorably for us in the future, that we will not experience significant work stoppages in future years or that we will not record significant charges related to those work stoppages.

We may incur costs to engage in future business combinations or strategic investments and the anticipated benefits of those transactions may not be realized.

As part of our business strategy, we may seek to enter into business combinations, investments, joint ventures and other strategic alliances with other companies in order to maintain and grow revenue and market presence as well as to provide us with access to technology, products and services. Those transactions would be accompanied by risks that may harm our business, such as difficulties in assimilating the operations, personnel and products of an acquired business or in realizing the projected benefits; disruption of our ongoing business; potential increases in our indebtedness and contingent liabilities; and charges if the acquired company or assets are later worth less than the amount paid for them in the Original Acquisition. In addition, our senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our notes may prohibit us from making acquisitions that we may otherwise wish to pursue.

We depend on high utilization of our manufacturing capacity.

As many of our costs are fixed, a reduction in capacity utilization, together with other factors such as yield and product mix, could reduce our profit margins and adversely affect our operating results. A number of factors and circumstances may reduce utilization rates, including periods of industry overcapacity, low levels of customer orders, operating inefficiencies, mechanical failures and disruption of operations due to expansion or relocation of operations, power interruptions, fire, flood or other natural disasters or calamities.

The failure to achieve acceptable manufacturing yields could adversely affect our business.

The manufacture of semiconductors requires precision, a highly-regulated and sterile environment and expensive equipment. We may have difficulty achieving acceptable yields in the manufacture of our products. Slight impurities or defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer or other factors can cause significant difficulties, particularly in connection with the production of a new product, the adoption of a new manufacturing process or any expansion of our manufacturing capacity and related transitions.

We rely on certain subcontractors.

The majority of our net sales are derived from semiconductor devices assembled in advanced packages. The packaging of semiconductors is a complex process requiring, among other things, a high degree of technical skill and advanced equipment. We outsource our semiconductor packaging to subcontractors, most of which are located in Korea and Southeast Asia. We rely on these subcontractors to package our devices with acceptable quality and yield levels. If our semiconductor packagers experience problems in packaging our semiconductor devices or experience prolonged quality or yield problems, our operating results could be adversely affected.

We depend on successful parts and materials procurement for our manufacturing processes.

We use a wide range of parts and materials in the production of our semiconductors, including silicon, processing chemicals, processing gases, precious metals and electronic and mechanical components. We procure materials and electronic and mechanical components from domestic and foreign sources and original equipment manufacturers. If we cannot obtain adequate materials in a timely manner or on favorable terms for the manufacture of our products, either or both of our revenues or profits will decline.

We face product liability risks and the risk of negative publicity if our products fail.

Our semiconductors are incorporated into a number of end products, and our business is exposed to product liability risk and the risk of negative publicity if our products fail. Although we maintain insurance for product liability claims, the amount and scope of our insurance may not be adequate to cover a product liability claim that is asserted against us. In addition, product liability insurance could become more expensive and difficult to maintain and, in the future, may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

In addition, we are exposed to the product liability risk and the risk of negative publicity affecting our customers and suppliers. Our sales may decline if any of our customers are sued on a product liability claim. We may also suffer a decline in sales from the negative publicity associated with such a lawsuit or with adverse public perceptions in general regarding our customers’ products.

Our ability to compete successfully and achieve future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology, as well as our ability to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others.

We seek to protect our proprietary technologies and know-how through the use of patents, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and other security measures. The process of seeking patent protection takes a long time and is expensive. We cannot assure you that patents will issue from pending or future applications or that, if patents issue, they will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that the rights granted under the patents will provide us with meaningful protection or any commercial advantage. Some of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent application. The confidentiality agreements on which we rely may be breached and may not be adequate to protect our proprietary technologies. We cannot assure you that other countries in which we market our services will protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States.

Our ability to compete successfully depends on our ability to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. We have no means of knowing what patent applications have been filed in the United States until they are published. In addition, the semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Litigation, which could result in substantial costs to us and diversion of our resources, may also be necessary to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights or to defend against claimed infringement of the rights of others. In the event of an adverse outcome in any such litigation, we may be required to pay substantial damages, indemnify customers or licensees for damages they may suffer if the products they purchase from us or the technology they license from us violate the intellectual property rights of

others; stop our manufacture, use, sale or importation of infringing products; expend significant resources to develop or acquire non-infringing technologies; discontinue processes; or obtain licenses to the intellectual property we are found to have infringed. We cannot assure you that we would be successful in such development or acquisition or that such licenses would be available under reasonable terms, or at all.

Our competitors may develop, patent or gain access to know-how and technology similar to our own. Failure to protect our existing intellectual property rights may result in the loss of valuable technologies or our having to pay other companies for infringing on their intellectual property rights.

We are subject to many environmental laws and regulations that could affect our operations or result in significant expenses.

We are subject to requirements of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate, governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, use, handling, storage and disposal of, and exposure to, hazardous substances (including asbestos) and wastes, soil and groundwater contamination and employee health and safety. These laws and regulations are complex, constantly changing and have tended to become more stringent over time. We cannot assure you that we have been, or will be at all times, in complete compliance with all these laws and regulations or that we will not incur material costs or liabilities in connection with these laws and regulations in the future. The adoption of new environmental, health and safety laws, the failure to comply with new or existing laws, or issues relating to hazardous substances could subject us to material liability (including substantial fines or penalties), impose the need for additional capital equipment or other process requirements upon us, curtail our operations, or restrict our ability to expand operations.

We could suffer adverse tax and other financial consequences as a result of changes in, or differences in the interpretation of, applicable tax laws.

Our company organizational structure is based, in part, on assumptions about the various tax laws, including withholding tax, and other laws of applicable non-U.S. jurisdictions. In addition, our Korean subsidiary (“MagnaChip Korea”) was granted a limited tax-holiday under Korean law in October 2004, which provides for certain tax exemptions for corporate taxes, withholding taxes, acquisition taxes, property and land taxes and other taxes for five years. Our interpretations and conclusions are not binding on any taxing authority, and, if our assumptions about tax and other laws are incorrect or if the authorities were to change or modify the relevant laws, we could suffer adverse tax and other financial consequences or have the anticipated benefits of our company organizational structure materially impaired.

A limited number of persons indirectly control us.

CVC, Francisco Partners, and CVC Asia Pacific own approximately 34.1%, 34.1% and 18.3%, respectively, of the outstanding voting interests in MagnaChip. By virtue of their ownership of these voting interests, and the securityholders’ agreement among MagnaChip and its unitholders, these entities have significant influence over our management and will be able to determine the outcome of all matters required to be submitted to the unitholders for approval, including the election of a majority of our directors and the approval of mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

We may need additional capital in the future and it may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.

We may require more capital in the future to fund our operations, finance investments in equipment and infrastructure, and respond to competitive pressures and potential strategic opportunities. Additional capital may not be available when needed or, if available, may not be available on satisfactory terms. If we are unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, or if we are unable to obtain capital at all, we may have to reduce our operations or forego opportunities and it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our international operations are subject to various risks that may lead to decreases in financial results.

We face risks inherent in international operations, such as unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other market barriers, political, social and economic instability, adverse tax consequences, war, civil disturbances and acts of terrorism, difficulties in accounts receivables collection, extended payment terms and differing labor standards, enforcement of contractual obligations and protection of intellectual property. These risks may lead to increased costs or decreased revenue growth, or both.

Any increase in tensions with North Korea could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Relations between Korea and North Korea have been tense throughout Korea’s modern history. The level of tension between Korea and North Korea has fluctuated and may increase or change abruptly as a result of current and future events. Although we do not derive any revenue from, nor sell any products in, North Korea, any future increase in tensions which may occur, for example, the breakdown of high-level contacts between Korea and North Korea or the occurrence of military hostilities, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to risks associated with currency fluctuations.

Our revenues are denominated in various currencies, specifically, the Korean Won, Japanese Yen, Euro and U.S. dollar. As a result, changes in the exchange rates of these currencies or any other applicable currencies to the U.S. dollar will affect the translated price of products and therefore operating margins and could result in exchange losses.

The majority of our costs are denominated in Korean Won and to a lesser extent in Japanese Yen, U.S. dollar and Euro. Therefore, changes in the exchange rates of these currencies or any other applicable currencies to the U.S. dollar will affect cost of goods sold and operating margins and could result in exchange losses.

We cannot fully predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our profitability. From time to time, we may have engaged in, and may continue to engage in, exchange rate hedging activities in an effort to mitigate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. However, we cannot assure you that any hedging technique we implement will be effective. If it is not effective, we may experience reduced operating margins.

Our historical financial information may not be representative of our results as a separate company.

Prior to the Original Acquisition, we operated as a division of Hynix. Historical financial information for periods prior to September 30, 2004, was derived from Hynix’s consolidated financial statements, has been presented on a carve-out basis and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations or cash flows would have been had we been a separate, stand-alone company during the periods presented. As carve-out financial statements, the financial statements include allocations of the costs of shared activities and overhead of Hynix and of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment shared with Hynix. These allocations are based upon various assumptions and estimates, some of which are subjective. Actual results of our operations had we operated on a stand-alone basis, may differ from those allocations and estimates. Also, as part of the Original Acquisition we did not acquire certain assets that were included in the carve-out financial statements and we assumed certain additional costs and obligations that are not reflected in the carve-out financial statements. Accordingly, the carve-out financial statements should not be relied upon as being representative of our financial position or operating results had we operated on a stand-alone basis, nor may they be representative of our financial position or operating results following the Original Acquisition.

Our expenses could increase if Hynix were unwilling or unable to provide certain services related to our shared facilities with Hynix.

Because we share certain facilities with Hynix, a few services that are essential to our business are provided to us by or through Hynix. These services include electricity, bulk gasses and de-ionized water, campus facilities, wastewater and sewage management, and environmental safety. If any of our agreements with Hynix were terminated or if Hynix were unwilling or unable to fulfill its obligations to us under the terms of these agreements, we would have to procure these services on our own and as a result may experience an increase in our expenses.

In addition, we lease building and warehouse space from Hynix in Cheongju, Korea, and lease to Hynix some of the space we own in Cheongju, Korea. If Hynix were to become insolvent, we could lose our leases on some of our building and warehouse space.

Research and development investments may not yield profitable and commercially viable products and thus will not necessarily result in increases in revenues for us.

We invest significant resources in our research and development. However, research and development efforts may not yield commercially viable products. During each stage of research and development there is a substantial risk that we will have to abandon a potential product which is no longer marketable and in which we have invested significant resources. In the event we are able to develop viable new products, a significant amount of time will have elapsed between our investment in the necessary research and development effort and the receipt of any related revenues.

Investor confidence may be adversely impacted if we are unable to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Beginning with our fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, we will be subject to rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which require us to include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K our management’s report on, and assessment of the effectiveness of, our internal controls over financial reporting. Beginning with our fiscal year ending December 31, 2008, our independent auditors will be required to attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. If we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, there is a risk that we will not comply with all of the requirements imposed by Section 404. Moreover, effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. Any of these possible outcomes could result in an adverse reaction in the financial marketplace due to a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which ultimately could harm our business and could negatively impact the market price of our securities.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not Applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

We own and operate five wafer fabrication facilities, or fabs, which have a combined production capacity of over 119,000 eight-inch equivalent wafers per month. We manufacture wafers at our two 8-inch fabs and our 6-inch fab located in Cheongju, Korea and our 8-inch fab and our 5-inch fab located in Gumi, Korea. The Cheongju facilities have three main buildings totaling 164,058 square meters. The Gumi facilities have two main buildings with 50,351 square meters devoted to manufacturing. We also lease from Hynix certain exclusive-use space plus certain common- and joint-use space in several buildings, primarily warehouses and utility facilities, in Cheongju, Korea.

In addition to our fabs located in Cheongju and Gumi, Korea, we lease facilities in Seoul, Korea, Osaka, Japan, and Sunnyvale, California. Each of these facilities includes administration, sales and marketing, research and development, and operations functions. We also lease design facilities in Tokyo, Japan, which also has a sales and marketing office, and Lake Oswego, Oregon, and sales and marketing offices at our subsidiaries in several other countries.

The ownership of our wafer manufacturing assets is an important component of our business strategy that enables us to develop proprietary, differentiated products and maintain a high level of manufacturing control resulting in high production yields, shortened design and production cycles, adequate manufacturing capacity, and the capture of the wafer manufacturing profit margin.

The table below sets forth information with respect to our manufacturing facilities and technologies:


Manufacturing Facility	Location	Wafer Size	Technology
F-5	Cheongju	8”	0.18 / 0.15 / 0.13µm
F-4	Cheongju	8”	0.35 / 0.25 / 0.22µm
F-3	Gumi	8”	0.5 / 0.35µm
F-2	Cheongju	6”	0.8 /0.6 /0.5µm
F-1	Gumi	5”	1.2µm

We outsource most of our back-end manufacturing processes, including assembly, test and packaging to independent providers of these services.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are subject to lawsuits and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business and intellectual property litigation and infringement claims. Intellectual property litigation and infringement claims, in particular, could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling our products. We are currently not involved in any legal proceedings, the outcome of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

There is currently no established public trading market for our outstanding common equity.

Holders

The approximate number of record holders of our outstanding class of common equity as of March 1, 2007, was 206.

Dividends

We did not pay any dividends in fiscal year 2006. Our ability to pay dividends is restricted by certain covenants contained in our senior credit facilities, as well as certain restrictions contained in our indentures relating to our senior notes and our subordinated notes.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth our selected financial and other data as of the dates and periods indicated. The information contained in this table should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and our historical financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004			Year ended December 31
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004			2003			2002
	(Successor Company)(1)									(Predecessor Company)(1)
	*(in millions of US dollars, except unit data)*
Statement of Operations Data
Net Sales
Related party(2)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	163.8		$	260.7		$	306.8
Other		744.3			937.7			243.6			677.8			570.1			393.5

		744.3			937.7			243.6			841.6			830.8			700.3
Cost of sales		644.9			729.0			204.5			654.6			752.5			691.0

Gross profit		99.4			208.7			39.1			187.0			78.3			9.3
Selling, general and administrative		87.7			123.3			29.8			54.0			68.7			61.9
Research and development		131.2			107.6			22.1			75.7			86.6			87.0
Restructuring and impairment charges		94.3			36.2			—			—			—			—

Operating income (loss)		(213.8	)		(58.4	)		(12.8	)		57.3			(77.0	)		(139.6	)

Interest expense, net		(57.2	)		(57.2	)		(16.7	)		(17.7	)		(37.8	)		(46.8	)
Foreign currency gain, net		50.9			16.5			30.4			5.3			1.4			8.6
Other		—			—			—			1.1			1.1			1.3

Other income (expenses)		(6.3	)		(40.7	)		13.7			(11.3	)		(35.3	)		(36.9	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(220.1	)		(99.1	)		0.9			46.0			(112.3	)		(176.5	)
Income tax expenses		9.2			1.8			6.7			2.8			1.4			1.8

Net income (loss)	$	(229.3	)	$	(100.9	)	$	(5.8	)	$	43.2		$	(113.7	)	$	(178.3	)

Dividends to preferred unitholders		10.9			9.9			13.4			N/A			N/A			N/A

Net loss attributable to common units	$	(240.2	)	$	(110.8	)	$	(19.2	)		N/A			N/A			N/A

Net loss per common unit—basic and diluted	$	(4.54	)	$	(2.10	)	$	(0.38	)		N/A			N/A			N/A

Weighted average number of units—basic and diluted		52,911,734			52,898,497			50,061,910			N/A			N/A			N/A
Balance Sheet Data at period end
Cash and cash equivalents	$	89.2		$	86.6		$	58.4		$	—		$	—		$	—
Working capital(3)		122.6			141.4			129.3			75.9			21.7			3.1
Total assets		770.1			1,040.6			1,154.5			653.8			790.0			1,077.8
Total indebtedness(4)		750.0			750.0			750.7			252.6			468.1			631.7
Preferred units		117.4			106.5			96.5			—			—			—
Owners’ equity		N/A			N/A			N/A			206.7			155.3			268.3
Unitholders’ equity		(284.5	)		(46.5	)		55.9			N/A			N/A			N/A
Foreign exchange rate (KRW/USD)(5)
Average exchange rate		954.3			1,023.8			1,090.8			1,163.3			1,191.8			1,250.3
End-of-period exchange rate		930.0			1,010.0			1,035.1			1,152.0			1,192.0			1,186.3

(1)

On October 6, 2004, MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC completed the Original Acquisition. For accounting purposes and consistent with its reporting periods, the Company has used October 1, 2004 as the effective date of the Original Acquisition since the financial results from October 1, 2004 onwards accrued to the Company’s benefit. As a result, the Company has reported its operating results and financial position for all periods from and after October 1, 2004, as those of the successor company. The predecessor company periods and the successor company periods have different bases of accounting and are therefore not comparable.

(2)	Primarily relates to wafer foundry contract manufacturing services to Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Display Technology and other related parties during the predecessor company periods when the Company was the System IC division within Hynix.

(3)	Working capital is calculated as current assets less current liabilities.

(4)	Total indebtedness is calculated as long and short-term borrowings, including the current portion of long-term borrowings.

(5)	As a substantial portion of the Company’s revenues and assets are recorded in KRW functional currency, conversion to US Dollar reporting currency is required at the end of each reporting period in order to follow the methodology prescribed in SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors set forth elsewhere in this Form 10-K and in the Company’s prior public filings with the SEC. These forward–looking statements are made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events impacting the Company and, therefore, involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The Company’s management cautions that forward–looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward–looking statements. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. While the Company periodically reassesses material trends and uncertainties affecting the Company’s results of operations and financial condition in connection with the preparation of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and certain other sections contained in the Company’s quarterly, annual or other reports filed with the SEC, the Company does not intend to review or revise any particular forward–looking statement in light of future events.

Overview

We are a leading designer, developer and manufacturer of mixed-signal and digital multimedia semiconductors addressing the convergence of consumer electronics and communication devices. We focus our core business on CMOS image sensors and flat panel display drivers, which are complex, high-performance mixed-signal semiconductors that capture images and enable and enhance the features and capabilities of both small and large flat panel displays. We also provide wafer foundry services whereby we leverage our specialized process technologies and low cost manufacturing facilities to produce semiconductors for third parties using their product designs. Our solutions are used in a wide variety of consumer and commercial mass market applications, such as mobile handsets, including camera-equipped mobile handsets, flat panel monitors and televisions, mobile displays, portable computer displays, handheld gaming devices, PDAs and audio-visual equipment such as DVD players.

We have three separate business segments: Display Solutions, Imaging Solutions and Semiconductor Manufacturing Services.

•

Display Solutions: Our Display Solutions segment offers flat panel display drivers for the entire product range of small to large panel displays, including mobile handsets, handheld gaming devices, PDAs, displays for desktop and mobile computer monitors and flat panel televisions. Our products also cover a broad range of technologies and interfaces including LTPS, TFT, CSTN, OLED technologies, RSDS and mini-LVDS interfaces.

•

Imaging Solutions: Our Imaging Solutions segment address a broad spectrum of consumer electronics products ranging from camera-equipped mobile handsets to personal computer webcams, offering VGA, 1.3, 2.1 and 3.2 megapixel CMOS image sensors. Our highly integrated image sensors are designed to be cost effective and to provide brighter, sharper and more colorful image quality for use primarily in applications that require small form factors, low power consumption, effective heat dissipation and high reliability.

•

Semiconductor Manufacturing Services: Our Semiconductor Manufacturing Services segment uses our process technology and manufacturing facilities to manufacture semiconductor wafers for third parties based on their designs. We provide our services to specialty markets that utilize high-voltage, embedded memory, analog and power processes. We offer customized services for clients globally at our state-of-the-art fabrication facilities located in Cheongju and Gumi, Korea. Our fabs provide us with large scale, cost-effective and flexible capacity enabling us to rapidly scale to high volume to meet shifts in demand by our end customers.

Basis of Presentation

Prior to October 1, 2004, our consolidated financial statements were prepared on a carve-out basis from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of Hynix using the actual results of operations and actual basis of assets and liabilities of our business. The consolidated statements of operations include allocations of certain raw materials, other assets and accounts payable which our business has historically shared with Hynix, and allocations of certain manufacturing costs, general and administrative, sales and marketing, and other miscellaneous expenses. These allocations were made on a specifically identifiable basis or using the relative percentages, as compared to Hynix’s other businesses, of sales, headcount, raw material consumption or other reasonable methods. Hynix and MagnaChip considered these allocations to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided. We believe the assumptions underlying the consolidated financial statements are reasonable. However, the consolidated financial statements may not necessarily reflect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows in the future or what our results of operations, financial position and cash flows would have been, had we been a separate stand-alone company during the historical carve-out periods presented. As part of the Original Acquisition, we did not acquire certain assets that were included in the carve-out financial statements and we assumed certain additional obligations that are not reflected in the carve-out financial statements. Accordingly, the carve-out financial statements should not be relied upon as being representative of our financial position or operating results had we operated on a stand alone basis, nor may they be representative of our financial position or operating results following the Original Acquisition.

Prior to our fiscal year 2006, we operated in a single segment—semiconductor manufacturing. In our fiscal year 2006, subsequent to the appointment of new chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) as defined by Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Relate Information, the manner in which the CODM reviewed the Company’s operational results and made significant business decisions was changed to include disaggregated financial information with respect to our three primary business units. Segment information for the prior periods was prepared in conformity with the current segment structure.

Results of Operations—Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005


	Year ended December 31, 2006					Year ended December 31, 2005					Change
	Amount			% of net sales		Amount			% of net sales		Amount			%
	*(in millions of US dollars; %)*
Net sales	$	744.3		100.0		$	937.7		100.0		$	(193.4	)	(20.6	)
Cost of sales		644.9		86.6			729.0		77.7			(84.1	)	(11.5	)

Gross profit		99.4		13.4			208.7		22.3			(109.3	)	(52.4	)

Selling, general and administrative expenses		87.7		11.8			123.3		13.1			(35.6	)	(28.9	)
Research and development expenses		131.2		17.6			107.6		11.5			23.6		21.9
Restructuring and impairment charges		94.3		12.7			36.2		3.9			58.1		160.5

Operating income (loss)		(213.8	)	(28.7	)		(58.4	)	(6.2	)		(155.4	)	266.1
Interest expense, net		(57.2	)	(7.7	)		(57.2	)	(6.1	)		0.0		0.0
Foreign currency gain, net		50.9		6.8			16.5		1.8			34.4		208.5

Income (loss) before income taxes		(220.1	)	(29.6	)		(99.1	)	(10.5	)		(121.0	)	122.1
Income tax expenses		9.2		1.2			1.8		0.2			7.4		411.1

Net income (loss)	$	(229.3	)	(30.8	)	$	(100.9	)	(10.7	)	$	(128.4	)	127.3


*Net Sales*

	Year ended December 31, 2006					Year ended December 31, 2005					Change
	Amount			% of total		Amount			% of total		Amount			%
	*(in millions of US dollars; %)*
Display solutions	$	273.7		36.8		$	326.1		34.8		$	(52.4	)	(16.1	)
Imaging solutions		60.5		8.1			163.3		17.4			(102.8	)	(63.0	)
Semiconductor Manufacturing Services		342.4		46.0			345.4		36.8			(3.0	)	(0.9	)
All other		67.7		9.1			102.9		11.0			(35.2	)	(34.2	)

	$	744.3		100.0		$	937.7		100.0		$	(193.4	)	(20.6	)

We derive a majority of our net sales from three operating segments: Display Solutions, Imaging Solutions and Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. The “All other” category for 2006 represents certain business activities other than these business segments, principally composed of rental and unit processing. All other for the prior period also included certain business activities exited in late 2005 or early 2006, such as our application processor and DRAM foundry business.

Total net sales for 2006 decreased $193.4 million, or 20.6% compared to 2005. Net sales generated from the three operating segments in 2006 were $676.6 million, a decrease of $158.2 million or 18.9% from net sales from the three operating segments in 2005.

Display Solutions. Net sales from Display Solutions for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $273.7 million, a $52.4 million or 16.1% decrease from $326.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This decrease was primarily attributable to sales volume decrease in large display driver products as a result of our customer’s inventory correction, build-up of inventory in the prior year and subsequent reductions of inventory in 2006 due to less-than-expected market demand from our major customers. In addition, average selling price erosion during 2006 also had a negative impact on net sales.

Imaging Solutions. Imaging Solutions net sales decreased $102.8 million in 2006, or 63% compared to net sales generated in 2005. This decrease was primarily attributable to missed opportunities from our delays in transition to new mega-pixel products, which was expected to substitute our VGA products. Revenue from our traditional VGA products decreased year-over-year due to lower market demand and a decline in average selling price.

Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. Net sales from Semiconductor Manufacturing Services for the year ended December 31, 2006, were $342.4 million, a $3.0 million or 0.9% decrease compared to net sales of $345.4 million for 2005. A moderate decrease in average selling price was mostly offset by an increase in wafer volume.

All other. Net sales from All other for 2006 were $67.7 million compared to $102.9 million for 2005. The year-over-year reduction of $35.2 million represents net sales from the exited application processor business and DRAM foundry business, which was partially offset by an increase in revenue from unit processing.

Gross Profit


	Year ended December 31, 2006					Year ended December 31, 2005			Change
	Amount			% of net sales		Amount		% of net sales	Amount			%
	*(in millions of US dollars; %)*
Display solutions	$	35.6		13.0		$	66.6	20.4	$	(31.0	)	(46.5	)
Imaging solutions		(4.0	)	(6.6	)		25.4	15.6		(29.4	)	(115.7	)
Semiconductor Manufacturing Services		45.7		13.3			110.4	32.0		(64.7	)	(58.6	)
All other		22.1		32.6			6.3	6.1		15.8		250.8

	$	99.4		13.4		$	208.7	22.3	$	(109.3	)	(52.4	)

Total gross profit decreased $109.3 million in 2006, or 52.4%, compared to gross profit generated in 2005. Gross margin percentage for 2006 was 13.4% of net sales, a decrease of 8.9% from 22.3% for 2005. This decline in gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to lower utilization of our manufacturing capacity as a result of substantial sales decreases, coupled with an overall decrease in average selling prices.

Display Solutions. Gross margin percentage for Display Solutions for the year ended December 31, 2006 declined to 13.0% compared to 20.4% for the year ended December 31, 2005. This decline in gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to lower average selling price and higher overhead cost per-unit driven by a decrease in unit volume.

Imaging Solutions. Imaging Solutions reported gross loss for the year ended December 31, 2006, due to a significant reduction in revenues as a result of a weak market position for new products, coupled with significant decreases in market demand for existing products.

Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. Gross margin for Semiconductor Manufacturing Services declined to 13.3% in 2006 from 32.0% in 2005. The year-over-year decrease was primarily attributable to lower margin mix within the segment.

All other. Gross margin percentage for All other for 2006 increased to 32.6% from 6.1% for the year ended December 31, 2005. This increase is mainly attributable to the discontinuation of the less profitable application processor and DRAM foundry businesses.

Operating Expenses

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $87.7 million or 11.8% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $123.3 million or 13.1% for the year ended December 31, 2005. This decrease of $35.6 million or 28.9% from the prior year was primarily

attributable to a reduction in professional service fees driven by our cost containment efforts and a decrease in amortization expense of intangible assets as a result of an impairment taken during the year.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $131.2 million, a $23.6 million or 21.9% increase from $107.6 million for the year ended December 21, 2005. This increase in research and development expenses during the year primarily represents our focus on the introduction of new products, especially in the Imaging Solutions and Display Solutions segments. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense increased to 17.6% in current period compared to 11.5% in the prior period.

Restructuring and Impairment Charges. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded restructuring and impairment charges totaling $94.3 million, which included $92.9 million of impairment charges under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets and $1.4 million of restructuring charges under SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.

The impairment charges of $92.5 million recorded during 2006 related to certain fixed assets and technology and customer-based intangible assets (the “asset group”) comprising our Imaging Solution business. At the end of 2005, the capacity utilization of the Fab was under the level that we believe to be normal. This was primarily due to a transition in product mix, coupled with a seasonal decrease in market demand, which was deemed to be temporary and recoverable. However, in 2006, our management determined, based on revised forecasting, that the projected demand for certain of its products in our Imaging Solutions business was significantly less than previously forecasted and that this decline was not temporary or seasonal. Therefore, we assessed whether there had been an impairment of the asset group pursuant to SFAS No. 144 and, based on the assessment, recorded the impairment charge. We also recorded $0.4 million of impairment charges in association with the disposition of certain held-for-sale assets.

The $1.4 million of restructuring charges for 2006 were incurred in connection with the termination of certain of our management and employees.

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded a one-time charge of $36.2 million of restructuring and impairment charges which included $33.5 million for asset impairment and $2.7 million for restructuring.

Other Income (Expense)

Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense was $57.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, consistent with $57.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Substantially all of our interest expense is to serve our long-term borrowings of $750.0 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 7.4%.

Net Foreign Currency Gain. Net foreign currency gain for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $50.9 million, compared to $16.5 for the year ended December 31, 2005. A substantial portion of our net foreign currency gain was non-cash translation gain recorded for intercompany borrowings at one of our subsidiaries.

Income Tax Expenses

Income tax expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $9.2 million while income tax expenses were $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The lower income tax expenses in the prior period were primarily attributable to the income tax benefit recognized for a temporary difference related to revenue recognition at our Japanese subsidiaries, which became recognizable as a result of change in business model. Income tax expense for 2006 was comprised of $5.2 million of withholding taxes on the interest paid by one of our subsidiaries to its parent company, a $2.0 million income tax effect from the decrease of deferred tax assets and an aggregate $2.0 million of current income taxes incurred at various jurisdictions where we had our operations.

Results of Operations—Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004


						Year ended December 31, 2004
	Year ended December 31, 2005					Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004			Total twelve months ended December 31, 2004					Change
	Amount			% of net sales		Amount			Amount			Amount			% of net sales		Amount			%
	(Successor Company)								(Predecessor Company)
	*(in millions of US dollars; %)*
Net sales
Related party	$	—		—		$	—		$	163.8		$	163.8		15.1		$	(163.8	)	(100.0	)
Others		937.7		100.0			243.6			677.8			921.4		84.9			16.3		1.8

		937.7		100.0			243.6			841.6			1,085.2		100.0			(147.5	)	(13.6	)
Cost of sales		729.0		77.7			204.5			654.6			859.1		79.2			(130.1	)	(15.1	)

Gross profit		208.7		22.3			39.1			187.0			226.1		20.8			(17.4	)	(7.7	)

Selling, general and administrative expenses		123.3		13.1			29.8			54.0			83.8		7.7			39.5		47.1
Research and development expenses		107.6		11.5			22.1			75.7			97.8		9.0			9.8		10.0
Restructuring and impairment charges		36.2		3.9			—			—			—		—			36.2		n/a

Operating income (loss)		(58.4	)	(6.2	)		(12.8	)		57.3			44.5		4.1			(102.9	)	(231.2	)
Interest expense, net		(57.2	)	(6.1	)		(16.7	)		(17.7	)		(34.4	)	(3.2	)		(22.8	)	66.3
Foreign currency gain, net		16.5		1.8			30.4			5.3			35.7		3.3			(19.2	)	(53.8	)
Others, net		—		—			—			1.1			1.1		0.1			(1.1	)	n/a

Income (loss) before income taxes		(99.1	)	(10.5	)		0.9			46.0			46.9		4.3			(146.0	)	(311.3	)
Income tax expenses		1.8		0.2			6.7			2.8			9.5		0.9			(7.7	)	(81.1	)

Net income (loss)	$	(100.9	)	(10.7	)	$	(5.8	)	$	43.2		$	37.4		3.4		$	(138.3	)	(369.8	)

Net Sales


				Year ended December 31, 2004
	Year ended December 31, 2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004		Nine months ended September 30, 2004		Total twelve months ended December 31, 2004			Change
	Amount		% of total	Amount		Amount		Amount		% of total	Amount		%
	(Successor Company)					(Predecessor Company)
	*(in millions of US dollars; %)*
Display solutions	$	326.1	34.8	$	60.3	$	198.8	$	259.1	23.9	67.0		25.9
Imaging solutions		163.3	17.4		58.1		142.1		200.2	18.5	(36.9	)	(18.4	)
Semiconductor Manufacturing Services		345.4	36.8		88.3		270.2		358.5	33.0	(13.1	)	(3.7	)
All other		102.9	11.0		36.9		230.5		267.4	24.6	(164.5	)	(61.5	)

	$	937.7	100.0	$	243.6	$	841.6	$	1,085.2	100.0	(147.5	)	(13.6	)

Total net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $937.7 million, a $147.5 million or 13.6% decrease from $1.1 billion in 2004, which consisted of $841.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and $243.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004. The reduction was primarily attributable to a decrease of $133.4 million in our DRAM foundry business with Hynix, which is included in the All other category, driven by our strategic decision to focus on three core segments. Net sales generated from the three operating segments in 2005 were $834.8 million, compared to $817.8 million in 2004.

Display Solutions. Net sales from Display Solutions for the year ended December 31, 2005 were $326.1 million, a $67.0 million or 25.9% increase from $259.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. This revenue increase for Display Solutions was driven by an expansion in market demand, partially offset by a slight decline in average selling prices.

Imaging Solutions. Imaging Solutions net sales for the year ended December 2005 were $163.3 million, a decrease of $36.9 million or 18.5%, compared to $200.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. This decrease in net sales was mainly attributable to a decline in average selling price, especially in VGA products, which was partially offset by an increase in unit volume sales.

Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2005 generated from Semiconductor Manufacturing Services were $345.4 million, relatively consistent compared to $358.5 million of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 as a decrease in sales volume was mostly offset by an increase in average selling price.

All other. Net sales from All other decreased 61.5% to $102.9 million in 2005 from $267.4 million in 2004 as we strategically reduced DRAM foundry and application solutions in an effort to focus on three major business segments.

Gross Profit


				Year ended December 31, 2004
	Year ended December 31, 2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004		Nine months ended September 30, 2004		Total twelve months ended December 31, 2004			Change
	Amount		% of net sales	Amount		Amount		Amount		% of net sales	Amount			%
	(Successor Company)					(Predecessor Company)
	*(in millions of US dollars; %)*
Display solutions	$	66.6	20.4	$	4.5	$	30.3	$	34.8	13.4	$	31.8		91.4
Imaging solutions		25.4	15.6		12.7		56.7		69.4	34.7		(44.0	)	(63.4	)
Semiconductor Manufacturing Services		110.4	32.0		19.1		86.3		105.4	29.4		5.0		4.7
All other		6.3	6.1		2.8		13.7		16.5	6.2		(10.2	)	(61.8	)

	$	208.7	22.3	$	39.1	$	187.0	$	226.1	20.8	$	(17.4	)	(7.7	)

Total gross profit for 2005 decreased $17.4 million or 7.7%, compared to gross profit generated in 2004 mainly due to a decrease in revenue base. Gross margin percentage for 2005 increased to 22.3% of net sales from 20.8% of net sales for 2004. This improvement in gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to lower depreciation costs for 2005 associated with the application of purchase accounting from the Original Acquisition.

Display Solutions. Gross margin percentage for Display Solutions for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased to 20.4% as compared to 13.4% for the year ended December 31, 2004. The increase in gross margin percentage was primarily attributable to lower per-unit overhead costs driven by a significant increase in unit volume produced during 2005.

Imaging Solutions. Gross margin percentage for Imaging Solutions for 2005 was 15.6% compared with 34.7% for 2004. The gross margin decrease from 2004 was primarily attributable to decrease in average selling prices.

Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. Gross margin for Semiconductor Manufacturing Services increased to 32.0% in 2005 from 29.4% in 2004. This increase in gross margin percentage in 2005 resulted from higher average selling price and lower depreciation expenses during the period.

All other. Gross margin percentage for All other for 2005 was 6.1%, relatively consistent with 6.2% for 2004.

Operating Expenses

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $123.3 million or 13.1% of net sales in 2005. This represents a $39.5 million or 47.1% increase from a total of $83.8 million or 7.7% of net sales in 2004, which consisted of $54.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and $29.8 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to amortization of intangible assets recorded upon the application of purchase accounting as a result of the Original Acquisition. We also recognized increased professional fees related to consulting and infrastructure build-out as well as additional warranty reserves to cover possible exposures to future claims from customers.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses in 2005 were $107.6 million, a $9.8 million or 10.0% increase from $97.8 million in 2004, which consisted of $75.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and $22.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004. The increase in research and development expenses was mainly due to our reinforcement of research and development centers worldwide through our mergers and acquisitions and process development to support next generation products. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense increased to 11.5% in 2005 from 9.0% in 2004.

Restructuring and Impairment Charges. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded a one-time charge of $36.2 million of restructuring and impairment charges associated with the Company’s initiative to focus on its core businesses and streamline the organization. The amount included $33.5 million for asset impairment and $2.7 million for restructuring.

Other Income (Expense)

Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense was $57.2 million in 2005, a $22.8 million or 66.3% increase from aggregated interest expense of $34.4 million in 2004, which consisted of $17.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and $16.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004. The increase in net interest expense was primarily due to interest expenses incurred on the long-term debt of $750.0 million, which was issued in December 2004 and outstanding throughout the year 2005.

Net Foreign Currency Gain. Net foreign currency gain for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $16.5 million, compared to $35.7 for the year ended December 31, 2004. A substantial portion of our net foreign currency gain for 2005 was non-cash translation gain recorded for intercompany borrowings at one of our subsidiaries.

Income Tax Expenses

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $1.8 million in 2005, compared to $6.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, which on an aggregate basis totaled $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2005 was primarily attributable to $5.2 million of Korean withholding tax on the interest

income paid to our Korean subsidiary’s parent company. Income tax expense including this withholding tax was partially offset by the recognition of a deferred tax asset at our Japanese subsidiaries based on temporary difference related to revenue recognition.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal capital requirements are to fund working capital needs, to meet required debt payments, including debt service payments on the notes and, if drawn upon, the senior credit facility, and to invest in research and development and capital equipment. We anticipate that operating cash flow, together with available borrowing capacity under our senior credit facility, will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs, our research and development and capital expenditures needs and service requirements on our debt obligations for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2006 we had total long-term debt outstanding of $750.0 million.

Our principle sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents and available borrowings under our senior credit facility of $100 million. As of December 31, 2006 our cash and cash equivalents balance was $89.2 million or 11.6% of our total assets, a $2.6 million increase from $86.6 million or 8.3% of total assets as of December 31, 2005. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was due to cash inflow from operating activities coupled with an increase from foreign currency translation gains, mostly offset by cash outflows for capital expenditures and other investing activities.

We generated cash from operating activities of $30.5 million during the year 2006, which principally reflects the Company’s net loss of $229.3 million adjusted by $247.2 million of total non-cash items composed mainly of depreciation and amortization expenses and impairment charges. Cash from operating activities for 2006 decreased $73.1 million from $103.6 million for 2005. This decrease in cash from operating activities between the two periods was primarily due to 52.4% lower gross profits mitigated by a decrease in working capital during the year 2006.

Our working capital balance as of December 31, 2006 was $122.6 million compared to $141.4 million as of December 31, 2005. The decrease of $18.8 million in our working capital balance consisted primarily of a $35.4 million decrease in accounts receivable and $30.8 million decrease in inventories, partially offset by a $34.5 million decrease in accounts and other accounts payable and $5.3 million decrease in accrued expenses. This decrease in working capital is mainly attributable to a 20.6% decline in total net sales.

For investing activities, we used cash of approximately $33.4 million in 2006 compared to $64.1 million in 2005. The decrease in cash used for investing activities during the year 2006 was primarily attributable to lower capital equipment expenditures during the year. Cash outflows for acquisitions of subsidiaries in 2005 in an effort to reinforce global R&D capability also led to a higher investing cash outlay in 2005. We did not consummate any business acquisitions during the year 2006. Capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $41.4 million, a decrease of $23.1 million or 35.8% compared to $64.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This year over year decrease was a result of managing capital expenditure timing in order to better support the growth of our business from new customers and to optimize returns on investment.

For financing activities, we used $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. As we had sufficient capital resources available to serve our capital requirements we did not have significant financing activities during the year 2006. The cash outlay in 2006 was mainly due to our repurchase of common units upon termination of certain of our management and employees. Cash outflow in 2005 was mainly for the repayment of short-term borrowings at one of our subsidiaries that we acquired during the year.

Future Financing Activities. Our primary future capital requirements on a recurring basis will be funding working capital needs, meeting required debt payments, funding research and development, and capital expenditures. We anticipate that operating cash flows, together with available borrowings under our senior credit

facility, will be sufficient to meet these capital requirements for the foreseeable future. We may from time to time incur additional debt.

We may need to incur additional debt or issue equity to make strategic acquisitions of investments. However, we cannot assure you that such financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or that such financing will be available at all.

Contractual Obligations

Summarized in the table below are our obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations and minimum lease payment obligations as of December 31, 2006.


	Payments Due by Period
	Total	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	Thereafter	Interest expense
	*(in millions of US dollars)*
Revolving credit facility	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Secured notes and subordinated notes(*)	750.0	—	—	—	—	500.0	250.0
Operating lease	59.5	11.9	11.9	11.9	11.9	11.9	—
Others	8.5	7.7	1.1	—	—	—	—	(0.3	)

(*)	Excludes interest obligations on revolving credit facility and notes.

The Floating Rate Second Priority Senior Secured Notes of $300 million and Second Priority Senior Secured Notes of $200 million mature in 2011, while the Senior Subordinated Notes of $250 million mature in 2014. Interest rates are 3 month LIBOR + 3.25%, 6⁷/8% and 8%, respectively. These notes will be paid in full upon maturity.

Each indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to (i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) pay dividends or make other distributions on its capital stock or repurchase, repay or redeem its capital stock, (iii) make certain investments, (iv) incur liens, (v) enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates, (vi) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to the Company by its subsidiaries, and (vii) sell all or substantially all of its assets or merge with or into other companies.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

On December 23, 2004, two of the Company’s subsidiaries, MagnaChip Semiconductor S.A. and MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Company entered into a senior credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities providing for a $100 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The undrawn portion of such senior secured credit line as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were $93.8 million and $83 million, respectively. The utilized portions of the credit line are related to the issuance of letters of credit rather than cash drawdowns.

Other than the senior credit facility, there are no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plan—an amendment of SFAS No.87, 88, 106 and 132(R). This Statement requires an employer to recognize the over funded or under funded status of a defined benefit post retirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position, and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007.

We do not expect that the implementation of SFAS No. 158 will have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 requires companies to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy, as defined and may be required to provide additional disclosures based on that hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB No. 108 which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The guidance is applicable for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. We do not expect that adoption of SAB 108 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain income tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The Interpretation stipulates recognition and measurement criteria in addition to classification, interim period accounting and significantly expanded disclosure provisions for uncertain tax positions that are expected to be taken in a company’s tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement addresses the accounting for recognized servicing assets and liabilities related to certain transfers of the servicer’s financial assets and for acquisitions or assumptions of obligations to service financial assets that do not relate to the financial assets of the servicer and its related parties. SFAS No. 156 requires that all recognized servicing assets and liabilities are initially measured at fair value, and subsequently measured at either fair value or by applying an amortization method for each class of recognized servicing assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 156 is effective in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement amends SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140, and improves the financial reporting of certain hybrid financial instruments by requiring more consistent accounting. Specifically, this Statement allows fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. This Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of this Statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires our management to make significant judgments and estimates that affect our financial position and results of operations. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, including the accounting policies discussed below, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue is derived from the sale of semiconductor products we design and the manufacture of semiconductor wafers for third parties. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement

exists, the product has been delivered and title and risk of loss have transferred, the price is fixed and determinable, and collection of resulting receivables is reasonably assured. For certain distributors, standard products are sold without rights to return products or stock rotation or price protection rights. Our policy is to recognize revenue upon delivery of products to customers, where shipment represents the point when the rights and risks of ownership have passed to the customer, when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the price is fixed or determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Specialty foundry services are performed pursuant to manufacturing agreements and purchase orders. Standard products are shipped and sold based upon purchase orders from customers. All amounts billed to a customer related to shipping and handling are classified as sales, while all costs incurred by us for shipping and handling are classified as expenses.

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make payment. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be required. We record warranty liabilities for the estimated costs that may be incurred under our limited warranty. This warranty covers product defects based on compliance to our specifications and is normally applicable for twelve months from the date of purchase. These liabilities are recorded when related revenue is recognized. Warranty costs include the costs to replace the defective product. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the historical and anticipated rate of warranty claims on those repairs and the cost per claim to satisfy our warranty obligations. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, we periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amounts as necessary.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, using the average cost method, which approximates the first in, first out method. If net realizable value is less than cost at the balance sheet date, the carrying amount is reduced to the realizable value, and the difference is recognized as a loss on valuation of inventories under cost of sales. We estimate the net realizable value for such finished goods and work-in-progress based on current invoice prices. Inventory reserves are established when conditions indicate that the net realizable value is less than cost due to physical deterioration, obsolescence, changes in price levels, or other causes. Reserves are also established for excess inventory based on inventory levels in excess of six months of projected demand, as judged by management, for each specific product.

In addition, as prescribed in SFAS No. 151, the cost of inventories is determined based on the normal capacity of each fabrication facility. In case the capacity utilization is lower than a certain level, that the management believes to be normal, the fixed overhead costs per production unit which exceeds those under normal capacity, are charged to cost of sales rather than capitalized as inventories.

Useful Lives of Tangible and Intangible Assets

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Buildings and related structures are depreciated over the 10 to 40 year periods. Machinery, equipment and other assets including vehicles are depreciated over the estimated useful lives ranging 5 to 10 years.

Upon the Original Acquisition, machinery, equipment and other assets were assumed from Hynix, approximately 50% depreciated. Accordingly, remaining useful lives of these assets were determined at approximately 50% of initial useful lives.

Our intangible assets represent rights under patents, trademarks, property use rights, customer relationship and technology, and are amortized over the periods of benefit, ranging up to 10 years, on a straight-line basis.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review the carrying value of fixed assets for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and/or disposition. Factors which could trigger an impairment review include the following: (i) significant negative industry or economic trends, (ii) exiting an activity in conjunction with a restructuring of operations, (iii) current, historical or projected losses that demonstrate continuing losses associated with an asset, and (iv) management’s assessment of future manufacturing capacity requirements. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. The estimation of future cash flows involves numerous assumptions, which require our judgment, including, but not limited to, future use of the assets for our operations versus sale or disposal of the assets, future-selling prices for our products and future production and sales volumes. In addition, we must use our judgment in determining the groups of assets for which impairment tests are separately performed.

Restructuring Charges

We recognize restructuring charges in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Certain costs and expenses related to exit or disposal activities are recorded as restructuring charges when liabilities for those costs and expenses are incurred.

Income taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in a company’s financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

We established valuation allowances for deferred tax assets at most of our subsidiaries since, other than with respect to one particular subsidiary, it is not probable that a majority of the deferred tax assets will be realizable. The valuation allowance at this particular subsidiary was not set up since it is expected that the deferred tax assets at this subsidiary will be deemed realizable based on the current prospects for its future taxable income.

Unit-based Compensation

In 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective application method and began to account for unit-based compensation based on a fair value method. Under the provision of SFAS No. 123(R), unit-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair-value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. Consistent with prior-period pro forma presentation under SFAS No. 123, we use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value options. In developing assumptions for fair value calculation under SFAS No. 123(R), we use estimates based on historical data and market information. A small change in the assumptions used in the estimate can cause a relatively significant change in the fair value calculation.

The valuation of our common unit is based on an independent appraisal from a third party and is updated reflecting the changes in our financial results and prospects. Determination of the fair value of our common units involves complex and subjective judgments. If we make different judgments or adopt different assumptions, material differences could result in the timing and amount of the unit-based compensation expenses recorded because the estimated fair value of the underlying units for the options granted would be different.

Segment Information

We have determined, based on the nature of our operations and products offered to customers, that our reportable segments are Display Solutions, Imaging Solutions, and Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. Our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) as defined by SFAS 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, allocates resources to and assesses the performance by these segments. Prior to 2006, we had a single reportable segment—semiconductor manufacturing.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market conditions, including changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. In the normal course of our business, we are subject to market risk associated with interest rate movements and currency movements on our assets and liabilities.

Foreign Currency Risk. We have exposure to foreign currency exchange-rate fluctuations on net income from our subsidiaries denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, as our foreign subsidiaries in Korea, Taiwan, China, Japan and Hong Kong use local currency as their functional currency. From time to time these subsidiaries have cash and financial instruments in local currency. The amounts held in Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong and China are not material in regards to foreign currency movements. However, based on the cash and financial instruments balance at December 31, 2006 for our Korean subsidiary, a 10% devaluation of the Korean Won against the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a decrease of $3.2 million in our U.S. dollar financial instruments balance and cash balance.

Interest Rate Risk. The $200 million 6⁷/8% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2011 and the $250 million 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 are subject to changes in fair value due to interest rate changes. If the market interest rate had decreased by 10% and all other variables were held constant from their levels at December 31, 2006, we estimate that we would have additional interest expense costs over the market rate of $2.8 million (360 days basis). The fair value of these fixed rate notes would have decreased by $8.6 million or increased by $8.9 million with a 10% increase or decrease in the interest rate, respectively.

Cash Flow Interest Rate Risk. In 2005, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to convert the variable interest rate on our Floating Rate Second Priority Senior Secured Notes to a fixed interest rate for the periods to maturity date of June 2008. With this interest rate swap, cash flow interest rate risk was replaced with exposure to interest rate risk. For details, refer to “Note 9. Long-term Borrowings.”

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements


		Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		36

Consolidated Financial Statements

Statements of Operations (for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the three months ended December 31, 2004 (successor company) and the nine months ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company))		38

Balance Sheets (as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 (successor company))		39

Statements of Changes in Unitholders’ Equity (for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the three months ended December 31, 2004 (successor company) and the nine months ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company))		40

Statements of Cash Flows (for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the three months ended December 31, 2004 (successor company) and the nine months ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company))		41

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		42

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Unitholders of

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (Successor Company)

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, of changes in unitholders’ equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three-month period ended December 31, 2004 (successor basis), in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers

Seoul, Korea

March 26, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Unitholders of

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (Predecessor Company)

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated (carve-out) statements of operations, of changes in owners’ equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and its subsidiaries (Predecessor Company) (the “Company”) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor basis), in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers

Seoul, Korea

June 15, 2005

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands of US dollars, except unit data)


	Year Ended						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	December 31, 2006			December 31, 2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Net sales
Related party	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	163,760
Other		744,352			937,656			243,582			677,828

		744,352			937,656			243,582			841,588
Cost of sales		644,911			728,999			204,461			654,569

Gross profit		99,441			208,657			39,121			187,019

Selling, general and administrative expenses		87,677			123,211			29,784			53,982
Research and development expenses		131,252			107,590			22,058			75,657
Restructuring and impairment charges		94,266			36,234			—			—

Operating income (loss)		(213,754	)		(58,378	)		(12,721	)		57,380

Other income (expenses)
Interest expense, net		(57,159	)		(57,236	)		(16,816	)		(17,749	)
Foreign currency gain, net		50,861			16,532			30,437			5,364
Other		—			—			—			1,070

		(6,298	)		(40,704	)		13,621			(11,315	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(220,052	)		(99,082	)		900			46,065

Income tax expenses		9,258			1,816			6,725			2,828

Net income (loss)	$	(229,310	)	$	(100,898	)	$	(5,825	)	$	43,237

Dividends accrued on preferred units		10,912			9,928			13,428

Net loss attributable to common units	$	(240,222	)	$	(110,826	)	$	(19,253	)

Net loss per common unit—Basic and diluted	$	(4.54	)	$	(2.10	)	$	(0.38	)

Weighted average number of units—Basic and diluted		52,911,734			52,898,497			50,061,910

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands of US dollars, except unit data)


	December 31, 2006			December 31, 2005
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	89,173		$	86,574
Restricted cash		—			2,837
Accounts receivable, net		76,665			112,053
Inventories, net		57,846			88,677
Other receivables		6,754			9,501
Other current assets		13,626			10,148

Total current assets		244,064			309,790

Property, plant and equipment, net		336,279			485,077
Intangible assets, net		139,729			191,389
Other non-current assets		49,981			54,391

Total assets	$	770,053		$	1,040,647

Liabilities and Unitholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	62,399		$	93,911
Other accounts payable		32,423			35,368
Accrued expenses		23,647			28,968
Other current liabilities		2,980			10,102

Total current liabilities		121,449			168,349

Long-term borrowings		750,000			750,000
Accrued severance benefits, net		62,836			55,124
Other non-current liabilities		2,935			7,196

Total liabilities		937,220			980,669

Commitments and contingencies
Series A redeemable convertible preferred units; 60,000 units authorized, 50,091 units issued and 0 unit outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005		—			—
Series B redeemable convertible preferred units; 550,000 units authorized, 450,692 units issued and 93,997 units outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005		117,374			106,462

Total redeemable convertible preferred units		117,374			106,462

Unitholders’ equity
Common units; 65,000,000 units authorized, 52,720,784 and 53,091,570 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively		52,721			53,092
Additional paid-in capital		2,451			2,169
Accumulated deficit		(370,314	)		(130,092	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		30,601			28,347

Total unitholders’ equity		(284,541	)		(46,484	)

Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred units and unitholders’ equity	$	770,053		$	1,040,647

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Unitholders’ Equity and Owners’ Equity

(In thousands of US dollars, except unit data)


	Common Units					Additional Paid-In Capital			Owner’s Equity		Deferred Stock Compensation		Accumulated deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Total
	Units		Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital			Owner’s Equity		Deferred Stock Compensation		Accumulated deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Total
(Predecessor Company)
Balance at January 1, 2004									$	135,781	$	2,350				$	17,183		$	155,314
Comprehensive income :
Net income										43,237		—					—			43,237
Foreign currency translation adjustments										—		—					4,842			4,842

Total comprehensive income																				48,079
Deferred stock compensation										—		3,324					—			3,324

Balance at September 30, 2004									$	179,018	$	5,674				$	22,025		$	206,717

(Successor Company)
Balance at October 1, 2004	49,713,286		$	49,713		$	—						$	(13	)	$	(116	)	$	49,584
Issuance of common units	363,627			364			—							—			—			364
Exercise of unit options	2,456,090			2,456			—							—			—			2,456
Issuance of warrants in connection with Original Acquisition	—			—			2,100							—			—			2,100
Payment of accumulated accrued dividends	—			—			—							(10,891	)		—			(10,891	)
Dividends accrued on preferred units	—			—			—							(2,537	)		—			(2,537	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss	—			—			—							(5,825	)		—			(5,825	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	—			—			—							—			20,621			20,621

Total comprehensive income																				14,796

Balance at December 31, 2004	52,533,003		$	52,533		$	2,100						$	(19,266	)	$	20,505		$	55,872

Issuance of common units	504,317			504			10							—			—			514
Exercise of unit options	54,250			55			59							—			—			114
Dividends accrued on preferred units	—			—			—							(9,928	)		—			(9,928	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss	—			—			—							(100,898	)		—			(100,898	)
Fair valuation of derivatives	—			—			—							—			4,534			4,534
Foreign currency translation adjustments	—			—			—							—			3,308			3,308

Total comprehensive loss																				(93,056	)

Balance at December 31, 2005	53,091,570		$	53,092		$	2,169						$	(130,092	)	$	28,347		$	(46,484	)

Exercise of unit options	46,062			46			42							—			—			88
Repurchase of common units	(416,848	)		(417	)		(3	)						—			—			(420	)
Unit-based compensation	—			—			243							—			—			243
Dividends accrued on preferred units	—			—			—							(10,912	)		—			(10,912	)
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss	—			—			—							(229,310	)		—			(229,310	)
Fair valuation of derivatives	—			—			—							—			(193	)		(193	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	—			—			—							—			2,447			2,447

Total comprehensive loss	—			—			—							—			—			(227,056	)

Balance at December 31, 2006	52,720,784		$	52,721		$	2,451						$	(370,314	)	$	30,601		$	(284,541	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands of US dollars)


	Year Ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(229,310	)	$	(100,898	)	$	(5,825	)	$	43,237
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		188,560			202,929			45,855			266,862
Provision for severance benefits		11,497			16,583			3,397			15,353
Amortization of debt issuance costs		3,701			3,432			4,411			—
Gain on foreign currency translation, net		(54,188	)		(15,880	)		(33,263	)		(3,811	)
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net		1,490			(829	)		(193	)		(488	)
Impairment charges		92,858			33,576			—			—
Unit/stock-based compensation		243			—			—			3,324
Other		3,023			721			494			3,138
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		44,091			(25,812	)		(43,270	)		(7,067	)
Inventories		37,064			(806	)		36,513			(18,070	)
Other receivables		3,180			62,821			(56,917	)		(548	)
Deferred tax assets		1,954			(12,935	)		—			—
Accounts payable		(38,423	)		24,928			(33,061	)		(5,719	)
Other accounts payable		(15,897	)		(66,069	)		81,509			18,329
Accrued expenses		(7,453	)		(5,184	)		17,711			584
Other current assets		5,063			2,713			(6,009	)		(1,177	)
Other current liabilities		(7,329	)		200			9,842			1,450
Payment of severance benefits		(8,589	)		(13,831	)		(2,898	)		(6,602	)
Other		(1,065	)		(2,012	)		(1,011	)		3,376

Net cash provided by operating activities		30,470			103,647			17,285			312,171

Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from disposal of plant, property and equipment		3,651			673			—			—
Proceeds from disposal of intangible assets		2,819			—			—			—
Purchase of plant, property and equipment		(39,196	)		(62,334	)		(23,346	)		(84,595	)
Payment for intellectual property registration		(2,203	)		(2,174	)		(108	)		(2,128	)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired of $4,620 and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for three months ended December 31, 2004, respectively		—			(11,749	)		(488,152	)		—
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		3,002			10,307			(12,350	)		—
Other		(1,458	)		1,205			(2,027	)		1,392

Net cash used in investing activities		(33,385	)		(64,072	)		(525,983	)		(85,331	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of Senior Secured and Subordinated Notes		—			—			750,000			—
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		—			—			45,867			—
Proceeds from short-term borrowings		—			—			720			—
Issuance of common units		88			628			2,820			—
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred units		—			—			3,636			—
Repayment of short-term borrowings		—			(12,883	)		—			(46,978	)
Repayment of long-term borrowings		—			—			(347,718	)		(179,862	)
Repurchase of common units		(420	)		—			—
Redemption of redeemable convertible preferred units		—			—			(406,786	)		—
Payment of preferred dividends		—			—			(10,891	)		—
Debt issuance costs paid		—			(594	)		(27,635	)		—
Other		—			—			(16	)		—

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(332	)		(12,849	)		9,997			(226,840	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		5,846			1,452			10,217			—

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,599			28,178			(488,484	)		—

Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of the period		86,574			58,396			546,880			—

End of the period	$	89,173		$	86,574		$	58,396		$	—

Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	56,025		$	53,373		$	11,862		$	17,791

Cash paid for income taxes	$	12,685		$	15,370		$	76		$	2,828

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

1. General

The Company

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and its subsidiaries (successor company) (the “Company”) is a leading designer, developer and manufacturer of mixed-signal and digital multimedia semiconductors addressing the convergence of consumer electronics and communication devices.

The Company operates in three segments—Display Solutions, Imaging Solutions and Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. The Display Solutions segment offers flat panel display drivers for the entire product range of small to large panel displays, including mobile handsets, handheld gaming devices, PDAs, displays for desktop and mobile computer monitors and flat panel televisions. The Imaging Solutions segment addresses a broad spectrum of consumer electronics products ranging from camera-equipped mobile handsets to personal computer webcams, offering VGA, 1.3, 2.1 and 3.2 megapixel CMOS image sensors. The Semiconductor Manufacturing Services segment uses the Company’s process technology and manufacturing facilities to manufacture semiconductor wafers for third parties based on their designs. The Company has five wafer fabrication facilities located in Cheongju and Gumi in the Republic of Korea.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC was created on November 26, 2003 and was capitalized on September 10, 2004 under the laws of the State of Delaware. It was created with the sole purpose of acquiring the non-memory business (the “Business”) of Hynix Semiconductor Inc. (“Hynix”), which acquisition was completed with effect from October 1, 2004 (the “Original Acquisition”).

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements are summarized below.

For the periods as of and prior to September 30, 2004, the accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented on a carve-out basis reflecting the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and changes in owner’s equity and cash flows that were directly attributable to the Business of Hynix (predecessor company), which was purchased on October 6, 2004. The Company has used October 1, 2004, as the effective date of the Original Acquisition since the financial results from October 1, 2004 onwards accrue to its benefit.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company including its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements and disclosures. The most significant estimates and assumptions relate to the useful life of property, plant and equipment, allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, contingent liabilities, inventory valuation, restructuring accrual and impairment of long-lived assets. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future, actual results may be different from the estimates.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company has assessed in accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation, the functional currency of each of its subsidiaries in Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom and has designated the U.S. dollar to be their respective functional currencies. The Company and its other subsidiaries are utilizing their local currencies as their functional currencies. The financial statements of the subsidiaries in functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into the U.S. dollar in accordance with SFAS No. 52. All the assets and liabilities are translated to the U.S. dollar at the end-of-period exchange rates. Capital accounts are determined to be of a permanent nature and are therefore translated using historical exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated using average exchange rates. Foreign currency translation adjustments arising from differences in exchange rates from period to period are included in the foreign currency translation adjustment account in accumulated comprehensive income (loss) of unitholders’ equity. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included as a component of other income (expense) in the statement of operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an original maturity date of three months or less.

Accounts receivable reserves

An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided based on the aggregate estimated collectibility of their accounts receivable. The Company records an allowance for cash returns, presented within accounts receivable, based on the historical experience of the amount of goods that will be returned and refunded. In addition, the Company also includes in accounts receivable, an allowance for additional products that may have to be provided, free of charge, to compensate customers for products that do not meet previously agreed yield criteria, the low yield compensative reserve.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, using the average cost method, which approximates the first in, first out method (“FIFO”). If net realizable value is less than cost at the balance sheet date, the carrying amount is reduced to the realizable value, and the difference is recognized as a loss on valuation of inventories within cost of sales. Inventory reserves are established when conditions indicate that the net realizable value is less than costs due to physical deterioration, obsolescence, changes in price levels, or other causes. Reserves are also established for excess inventory based on inventory levels in excess of six months of projected demand, as judged by management, for each specific product.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Property, Plant and Equipment


Buildings		30 - 40 years
Building related structures		10 - 20 years
Machinery and equipment		5 - 10 years
Vehicles and others		5 years

Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures that enhance the value or significantly extend the useful lives of the related assets are capitalized.

Borrowing costs incurred during the construction period of assets are capitalized as part of the related assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparison of its carrying amount with the future net cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value of the assets and the fair value of assets using the present value of the future net cash flows generated by the respective long-lived assets.

Restructuring Charges

The Company recognizes restructuring charges in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Certain costs and expenses related to exit or disposal activities are recorded as restructuring charges when liabilities for those costs and expenses are incurred.

Lease Transactions

The Company accounts for lease transactions as either operating leases or capital leases, depending on the terms of the underlying lease agreements. Machinery and equipment acquired under capital lease agreements are recorded at cost as property, plant and equipment and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. In addition, the aggregate lease payments are recorded as capital lease obligations, net of unaccrued interest. Interest is amortized over the lease period using the effective interest rate method. Leases that do not qualify as capital leases are classified as operating leases, and the related rental payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Software

The Company capitalizes certain external costs that are incurred to purchase and implement internal-use computer software. Direct costs relating to the development of software for internal use are capitalized after technological feasibility has been established, in accordance with Statement Of Position (“SOP”) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Depreciation is calculated on a straight line basis over five years.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets acquired from Hynix include technology and customer relationships which are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 4 to 8 years. Other intellectual property assets acquired represent rights under patents, trademarks and property use rights and are amortized over the periods of benefit, ranging up to 10 years, on a straight-line basis.

Fair Value Disclosures of Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of financial instruments is determined by the Company, using available market information and valuation methodologies considered to be appropriate. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these financial instruments.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $612.6 million, $738.8 million and $750.0 million as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The fair value estimates presented herein were based on market interest rates and other market information available to management as of each balance sheet date presented. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The approximate fair values do not take into consideration expenses that could be incurred in an actual settlement. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

Accrued Severance Benefits

The majority of accrued severance benefits is for employees in the Company’s Korean subsidiary. Pursuant to the Labor Standards Act of Korea, most employees and executive officers with one or more years of service are entitled to severance benefits upon the termination of their employment based on their length of service and rate of pay. As of December 31, 2006, 97% of all employees of the Company were eligible for severance benefits.

Accrued severance benefits are funded through a group severance insurance plan. The amounts funded under this insurance plan are classified as a deduction to the accrued severance benefits. Subsequent accruals are to be funded at the discretion of the Company.

In accordance with the National Pension Act of the Republic of Korea, a certain portion of accrued severance benefits is deposited with the National Pension Fund and deducted from the accrued severance benefits. The contributed amount is refunded to employees from the National Pension Fund upon their retirement.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered and title and risk of loss have transferred, the price is fixed and determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Utilizing these criteria, product revenue is generally recognized upon delivery of the product at the end-customer’s location when the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer. Revenue is deferred from sales to distributors until the product is ultimately sold to the end-customer.

All amounts billed to a customer related to shipping and handling are classified as sales while all costs incurred by the Company for shipping and handling are classified as selling expenses. The amounts charged to selling expenses are $1,332 thousand and $1,867 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, $412 thousand for the three-month period ended December 31, 2004 (successor company) and $1,394 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company).

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Derivative Financial instruments

The Company’s primary objective for holding derivative financial instruments is to manage cash flow risk inherent in debts with variable interest rates. The company recognizes all derivative financial instruments at fair value as either assets or liabilities and reports changes in the fair value of those instruments in earnings or other comprehensive income depending on whether they meet the criteria for designation as hedging transactions under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended.

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $81 thousand and $310 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, $173 thousand for the three-month period ended December 31, 2004 (successor company), and $71 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company).

Product Warranties

The Company records, in other current liabilities, warranty liabilities for the estimated costs that may be incurred under its basic limited warranty. This warranty covers defective products, and related liabilities are accrued when product revenues are recognized. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty liability include historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and repair costs per claim to satisfy the Company’s warranty obligation. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts when necessary.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include wafer, masks, employee expense, contractor fees, building costs, utilities, and administrative expenses.

Licensed Patents and Technologies

The Company has entered into a number of royalty agreements to license patents and technology used in the design and manufacture of its products. The payments under these agreements include an initial payment to acquire the rights, and a royalty payment, calculated based upon the sales of the related products. The initial payments, usually paid in installments, represents a non-refundable commitment, such that the total present value of these payments is recorded as a liability upon execution of the agreement, and the costs are deferred over the period of the agreement. The royalty payments are charged to the statement of operations as incurred.

Unit-Based Compensation (Successor Company)

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment (revised 2004). As the Company elected to use the modified prospective application method, no restatement was made to the consolidated statements of operations for prior periods. Under SFAS 123(R), unit-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. As permitted under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company elected to recognize compensation expense for all options with graded vesting based on the graded attribution method.

Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for its unit-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and provided the required pro forma disclosures of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

As the exercise prices for all option grants were in excess of the fair value of the underlying units on the respective grant dates, no compensation cost was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the three months ended December 31, 2004.

Consistent with the valuation method for the disclosure-only provisions of FAS No. 123, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing-model to measure the grant-date-fair-value of options. The Black-Scholes model requires certain assumptions to determine an option’s fair value, including expected term, risk free interest, expected volatility and fair value of underlying common unit. The expected term of each option grant was based on employees’ expected exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior and the risk free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve for the period corresponding with the expected term at the time of grant. The expected volatility was estimated using historical volatility of share prices of similar public entities. No dividends were assumed for this calculation of option value. The fair value of the underlying common unit is determined based on an independent appraisal from a third party and is updated to reflect changes in the Company’s financial results and prospects.

Stock option Plan (Predecessor Company)

Stock options under employee stock plans prior to the Original Acquisition were accounted for using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. As part of the presentation of the Business on a carve-out basis, stock compensation was allocated to the Business based on the employees that historically have worked in the Business. The compensation cost for the Business was $3,324 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004.

Earnings per Unit

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, the Company computes basic earnings per unit by dividing net income available to common unitholders by the weighted average number of common units outstanding during the period which would include to the extent their effect is dilutive: redeemable convertible preferred units, options to purchase common units and warrants to purchase common units. Diluted earnings per unit reflect the dilution of potential common units outstanding during the period. In determining the hypothetical units repurchased, the Company uses the average unit price for the period.

Income Taxes

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC has elected to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and therefore is not subject to income taxes on its income. Taxes on its income are the responsibility of the individual equity owners of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC. The Company operates a number of subsidiaries, which are subject to local income taxes in those markets.

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in a company’s financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Segment Information

The Company has determined, based on the nature of its operations and products offered to customers, that its reportable segments are Display Solutions, Imaging Solutions, and Semiconductor Manufacturing Services. The Display Solutions segment’s primary products are flat panel display drivers and the Imaging Solutions segment’s primary products are CMOS image sensors. The Semiconductor Manufacturing Service segment provides for wafer foundry services to clients. Net sales and gross profit for the “All other” category primarily relates to certain business activities that do not constitute operating or reportable segments.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) as defined by SFAS 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, allocates resources to and assesses the performance of each segment using information about its revenue and gross profit. The Company does not identify or allocate assets by segments, nor does the CODM evaluate operating segments using discrete asset information. In addition, the Company does not allocate operating expenses, interest income or expense, other income or expense, or income tax expenses to the segments. Management does not evaluate segments based on these criteria.

Prior to 2006, the Company had a single reportable segment. In 2006, subsequent to the appointment of our new CODM, the Company changed the manner in which the CODM reviewed the Company’s operational results and made significant business decisions to include disaggregated financial information of its three primary business units. Segment information for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 was prepared in conformity with the current segment structure.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral for customers on accounts receivable. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, but historically has not experienced significant losses related to individual customers or groups of customers in any particular industry or geographic area. The Company derives a substantial portion of its revenues from export sales through its overseas subsidiaries in Asia, North America and Europe.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plan – an amendment of SFAS No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). This Statement requires an employer to recognize the over funded or under funded status of a defined benefit post retirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position, and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. SFAS 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2007. The Company does not expect that the implementation of SFAS No. 158 will have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 requires companies to disclose the fair value of their financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy, as defined and may be required to provide additional disclosures based on that hierarchy. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108 which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The guidance is applicable for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company does not expect that adoption of SAB 108 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain income tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The Interpretation stipulates recognition and measurement criteria in addition to classification and interim period accounting. The Interpretation significantly expanded disclosure provisions for uncertain tax positions that are expected to be taken in a company’s tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement addresses the accounting for recognized servicing assets and liabilities related to certain transfers of the servicer’s financial assets and for acquisitions or assumptions of obligations to service financial assets that do not relate to the financial assets of the servicer and its related parties. SFAS 156 requires that all recognized servicing assets and liabilities are initially measured at fair value, and subsequently measured at either fair value or by applying an amortization method for each class of recognized servicing assets and liabilities. SFAS 156 is effective in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 156 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement amends SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140, and improves the financial reporting of certain hybrid financial instruments by requiring more consistent accounting. Specifically, this Statement allows fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. This Statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect that adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3. Original Acquisition

On October 6, 2004, the Company completed its purchase of the Business, as outlined in the Business Transfer Agreement, as amended (the “BTA”) from Hynix, for cash, liabilities assumed, plus a warrant to purchase 5,079,254 common equity interests in the Company, valued by independent valuation. In October 2005, the Company agreed to pay Hynix an additional $6,238 thousand in cash as a working capital settlement payment. This additional amount, which was paid in full subsequently in October 2005, was included as part of the purchase consideration and therefore acquisition costs of related assets were subsequently adjusted.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

A summary of purchase consideration including such subsequent working capital settlement as well as assets and liabilities acquired is as follows:


Purchase consideration:
Cash	$	475,471
Loan assumed		285,807
Warrant to purchase common units		2,100

		763,378
Fair value of assets and liabilities acquired:
Current assets		(173,517	)
Non-current assets		(755,618	)
Current liabilities		119,262
Non-current liabilities		46,495

	$	—

Intangible assets acquired in connection with this acquisition are included in non-current assets and summarized as below:


	Acquisition cost		Weighted average amortization period
Technology	$	24,536	5.3 years
Customer relationship		174,134	7.0 years
Intellectual property assets		7,928	5.2 years

	$	206,598	6.7 years

At the date of the Original Acquisition, the Company obtained an independent valuation of the acquired property, plant and equipment and the acquired intangible assets, to ascertain the fair value of these assets, and in addition, applied adjustments to the book value of the other assets and liabilities transferred from Hynix to calculate the total fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. The Company also re-assessed the remaining useful lives of the acquired property, plant and equipment, and commenced depreciation on a straight-line basis, using the remaining useful lives of the acquired property, plant and equipment and acquired intangibles.

The aggregate fair values obtained exceeded the total purchase consideration of $763,378 thousand, and this difference was applied to the Company’s intangible and non-current tangible assets on a pro-rata basis, such that the adjusted fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired equaled the total purchase consideration, with no residual negative goodwill.

4. Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 consist of the following:


	December 31, 2006			December 31, 2005
Accounts receivable	$	65,203		$	93,221
Notes receivable		16,812			25,115
Less:
Allowances for doubtful accounts		(1,418	)		(617	)
Cash return reserve		(1,450	)		(3,000	)
Low yield compensation reserve		(2,482	)		(2,666	)

Accounts receivable, net	$	76,665		$	112,053

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Changes in allowance for doubtful accounts for each period are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Beginning balance	$	(617	)	$	(383	)	$	—		$	(145	)
Bad debt expense		(739	)		(229	)		(340	)		(57	)
Write off		—			—			—			94
Translation adjustments		(62	)		(5	)		(43	)		(5	)

Ending balance	$	(1,418	)	$	(617	)	$	(383	)	$	(113	)

Changes in cash return reserve for each period are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Beginning balance	$	(3,000	)	$	(2,156	)	$	(815	)	$	(71	)
Addition to (reversal of) reserve		(2,100	)		(8,131	)		(3,660	)		(1,895	)
Payment made		3,862			7,351			2,475			1,161
Translation adjustments		(212	)		(64	)		(156	)		(10	)

Ending balance	$	(1,450	)	$	(3,000	)	$	(2,156	)	$	(815	)

Changes in low yield compensation reserve for each period are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Beginning balance	$	(2,666	)	$	(2,911	)	$	(2,874	)	$	—
Addition to (reversal of) reserve		(4,117	)		(4,747	)		(2,260	)		(4,430	)
Payment made		4,520			5,059			2,533			1,584
Translation adjustments		(219	)		(67	)		(310	)		(28	)

Ending balance	$	(2,482	)	$	(2,666	)	$	(2,911	)	$	(2,874	)

5. Inventories

Inventories as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 consist of the following:


	December 31, 2006			December 31, 2005
Finished goods	$	16,169		$	28,414
Semi-finished goods and work-in-process		39,492			60,095
Raw materials		11,774			5,814
Materials in-transit		2,063			1,966
Less: valuation allowances		(11,652	)		(7,612	)

Inventories, net	$	57,846		$	88,677

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Changes in valuation allowances for each period are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Beginning balance	$	(7,612	)	$	(6,274	)	$	—		$	(6,651	)
Loss on valuation		(10,212	)		(2,816	)		(6,339	)		(7,728	)
Write off		6,868			1,627			383			7,923
Translation adjustments		(696	)		(149	)		(318	)		(229	)

Ending balance	$	(11,652	)	$	(7,612	)	$	(6,274	)	$	(6,685	)

6. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are comprised of the following:


	December 31, 2006			December 31, 2005
Buildings and related structures	$	162,383		$	149,236
Machinery and equipment		369,683			472,388
Vehicles and others		42,772			32,438

		574,838			654,062
Less: accumulated depreciation		(252,814	)		(181,806	)
Land		12,481			11,492
Construction in-progress		1,774			1,329

Property, plant and equipment, net	$	336,279		$	485,077

Aggregate depreciation expenses totaled $153,245 thousand and $157,678 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, $34,421 thousand for the three-month period ended December 31, 2004 (successor company) and $261,640 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company), respectively. In addition, capitalized interest costs totaled $64 thousand and $144 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, $53 thousand for the three-month period ended December 31, 2004 (successor company) and $334 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company), respectively.

Property, plant and equipment are pledged as collateral for our senior secured revolving credit facility and our Second Priority Senior Secured Notes to a maximum of $780 million as of December 31, 2006.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

7. Intangible assets

Intangible assets at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:


	December 31, 2006			December 31, 2005
Technology	$	21,289		$	23,911
Customer relationships		170,209			193,958
Goodwill		15,095			15,095
Intellectual property assets		9,742			10,969
Less: accumulated amortization		(76,606	)		(52,544	)

Intangible assets, net	$	139,729		$	191,389

Aggregate amortization expenses for intangible assets totaled $35,315 thousand and $45,251 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, $11,434 thousand for the three-month period ended December 31, 2004 (successor company) and $5,222 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 (predecessor company), respectively. The estimated aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the next five years is $29,334 thousand in 2007, $26,477 thousand in 2008, $17,725 thousand in 2009, $16,252 thousand in 2010 and $13,602 thousand in 2011.

Intangible assets are pledged as collateral for our senior secured revolving credit facility and our Second Priority Senior Secured Notes as of December 31, 2006.

8. Product Warranties

Changes in accrued warranty liabilities for each period are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Beginning balance	$	1,036		$	1,448		$	2,677		$	794
Addition to (reversal of) warranty reserve		(340	)		1,362			(977	)		4,103
Payments made		(647	)		(1,804	)		(477	)		(2,265	)
Translation adjustments		63			30			225			45

Ending balance	$	112		$	1,036		$	1,448		$	2,677

9. Long-Term Borrowings

On December 23, 2004, two of the Company’s subsidiaries, MagnaChip Semiconductor S.A. and MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Company, issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of Second Priority Senior Secured Notes consisting of $300 million aggregate principal amount of Floating Rate Second Priority Senior Secured Notes and $200 million aggregate principal amount of 6⁷/8% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes. At the same time, such subsidiaries issued $250 million aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Subordinated Notes.

Concurrently with the issuance of the Second Priority Senior Secured Notes, the Company entered into a new senior credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, financial institutions and other entities providing for a $100 million senior secured revolving credit facility. Interest is charged at current rates when drawn upon.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Details of long-term borrowings as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are presented as below:


	Maturity	Annual interest rate (%)	Amount of principal
Floating Rate Second Priority Senior Secured Notes	2011	3 month LIBOR +3.250	$	300,000
6⁷/8% Second Priority Senior Secured Notes	2011	6.875		200,000
8% Senior Subordinated Notes	2014	8.000		250,000

			$	750,000

The senior secured revolving credit facility and Second Priority Senior Secured Notes are collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company. These notes will be paid in full upon maturity.

Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are subject to significant conditions, including compliance with financial ratios and other covenants and obligations.

As of December 31, 2006, the Company and all of its subsidiaries except for MagnaChip Semiconductor (Shanghai) Company Limited have jointly and severally guaranteed each series of the Second Priority Senior Secured Notes on a second priority senior secured basis. As of December 31, 2006, the Company and all of its subsidiaries except for MagnaChip Semiconductor Ltd. (Korea) and MagnaChip Semiconductor (Shanghai) Company Limited have jointly and severally guaranteed the Senior Subordinated Notes on an unsecured, senior subordinated basis. In addition, the Company and each of its current and future direct and indirect subsidiaries (subject to certain exceptions) will be guarantors of Second Priority Senior Secured Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes.

In connection with the issuance of the notes and obtaining of the credit facility, the Company capitalized certain costs and fees, which are being amortized using the effective interest method or straight-line method over their respective terms, 2009 to 2014. Amortization costs, which were included in interest expense in the accompanying statements of operations, amounted to $3,701 thousand, $3,432 thousand and $167 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the three-month period ended December 31, 2004, respectively. The remaining capitalized costs as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $21,860 thousand, $25,113 thousand and $27,812 thousand, respectively. In addition, in connection with the repayment of the assumed debt from Hynix, the Company wrote off $4,084 thousand of previously capitalized financing fees for the three-month period ended December 31, 2004. These amounts have all been included in interest expense in the accompanying statement of operations.

On December 29, 2006, the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), dated as of December 29, 2006 (the “Fifth Amendment”), with MagnaChip Semiconductor S.A. and MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Company, as borrowers, the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto (the “Lenders”), and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “Agent”). Under the Fifth Amendment, among other things, (i) the Company agreed to furnish to the Agent and the Lenders (a) monthly liquidity and flash revenue reports along with an officer’s

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

certificate, (b) monthly narrative reports and management’s discussion and analysis regarding the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations, and (c) monthly reports regarding the cash accounts maintained by the Company and its subsidiaries; and (ii) the existing financial covenants set forth in Section 6.10 of the Credit Agreement were revised and additional financial covenants related to minimum EBITDA and liquidity requirements were added. The foregoing description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Fifth Amendment, which is referenced herein as Exhibit 10.3.e to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.

On March 26, 2007, the Company entered into the Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2007 (the “Sixth Amendment”), with MagnaChip Semiconductor S.A. and MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Company, as borrowers, the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, and the Agent. Under the Sixth Amendment, among other things, the existing financial covenants set forth in Section 6.10 of the Credit Agreement were revised to provide that authorized but unspent capital expenditures in a calendar quarter during 2007 carry over to increase the authorized limit on capital expenditures in successive quarters.

Interest Rate Swap

Effective June 27, 2005, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement (the “Swap”) that converted the variable interest rate based on the 3-month London Inter-bank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.25% to fixed interest rate on the Company’s Floating Rate Second Priority Senior Secured Notes (the “Notes”). This Swap will be in effect until 15 June, 2008.

The Swap qualifies as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The Company is utilizing the “hypothetical derivative method” to measure the effectiveness by comparing the changes in value of the actual derivative versus the change in fair value of the “hypothetical derivative.” Under this methodology, the actual swap was effective when compared to the hypothetical hedge.

Changes in fair value of the Swap are recorded under other comprehensive income in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company recorded a decrease in the fair value of $193 thousand and an increase in the fair value of $4,534 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, the Company recognized interest income of $2,944 thousand and interest expense of $550 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which represents the differences between fixed and variable rates.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

10. Accrued Severance Benefits

Changes in accrued severance benefits for each period are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Beginning balance	$	56,967		$	52,925		$	47,082		$	40,015
Provisions		11,497			16,583			3,397			15,352
Transferred from acquired company		—			196			—			—
Severance payments		(8,589	)		(13,831	)		(2,898	)		(6,837	)
Effect of foreign currency translation		4,767			1,094			5,344			1,473

		64,642			56,967			52,925			50,003
Less: Cumulative contributions to the National Pension Fund		(867	)		(900	)		(1,234	)		(1,304	)
Group severance insurance plan		(939	)		(943	)		(977	)		(1,202	)

	$	62,836		$	55,124		$	50,714		$	47,497

The severance benefits are funded approximately 2.79%, 3.24% and 4.18% as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, through severance insurance deposits for the payment of severance benefits, and the account is deducted from accrued severance benefits. In addition, the Company expects to pay the following future benefits to its employees upon their normal retirement ages:


	Severance benefit
2007 – 2008	$	—
2009		70
2010		215
2011		76
2012 – 2016		1,511

The above amounts were determined based on the employees’ current salary rates and the number of service years that will be accumulated upon their retirement dates. These amounts do not include amounts that might be paid to employees that will cease working with the Company before their normal retirement ages.

11. Redeemable Convertible Preferred Unit

The Company issued 49,727 units as Series A redeemable convertible preferred unit (the “Series A”) and 447,420 units as Series B redeemable convertible preferred unit (the “Series B”) on September 23, 2004 and additionally issued 364 units of Series A and 3,272 units of Series B on November 30, 2004, respectively. All of Series A were redeemed by cash on December 27, 2004 and a portion of the Series B were redeemed by cash on December 15, 2004 and December 27, 2004.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Changes in Series B for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three months ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004
	2006			2005
	Units	Amount		Units	Amount		Units		Amount
—Series A
Beginning of period	—	$	—	—	$	—	49,727		$	49,727
Issuance	—		—	—		—	364			364
Redemption	—		—	—		—	(50,091	)		(51,907	)
Accrual of preferred dividends	—		—	—		—	—			1,816

End of period	—	$	—	—	$	—	—		$	—

—Series B
Beginning of period	93,997	$	106,462	93,997	$	96,534	447,420		$	447,420
Issuance	—		—	—		—	3,272			3,272
Redemption	—		—	—		—	(356,695	)		(365,770	)
Accrual of preferred dividends	—		10,912	—		9,928	—			11,612

End of period	93,997	$	117,374	93,997	$	106,462	93,997		$	96,534

The Series B were issued to the original purchasers of the Company in 2004. Holders of Series B receive dividends which are cumulative, whether or not earned or declared by the board of directors. The cumulative cash dividends accrue at the rate of 10% per unit per annum on the Series B original issue price, compounded semi-annually.

Conversion

The outstanding Series B units are convertible, in whole or in part, into common equity interests upon or concurrently with the first public offering of the common equity interests of the Company at the Company’s option or the holder’s option based on a formula, represented by the conversion ratio. The conversion ratio for the Series B units is an amount equal to the original issue price per unit plus an amount per unit equal to full cumulative dividends accrued and unpaid to the date of the consummation of the first public offering, divided by the per common equity interest price to the public in the Company’s first public offering of equity securities.

Dividends

Holders of Series B receive dividends which are cumulative, whether or not earned or declared by the board of directors. The cumulative cash dividends accrue at the rate of 10% per unit per annum on the Series B original issue price, compounded semi-annually. Such dividends are payable in semi-annual installments in arrears commencing March 15, 2005.

Liquidation

In the event of liquidation, the holders of Series B are entitled to receive, out of the assets of the Company legally available for distribution to its members, whether from capital, surplus or earnings, an amount equal to the Series B original issue price in cash per unit plus an amount equal to full cumulative dividends accrued and unpaid thereon to the date of final distribution, and no more. If the net assets of the Company are insufficient to

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

pay the holders of all outstanding Series B and of any units ranking on a parity with the Series B, the full amounts to which they respectively shall be entitled, such assets, or the proceeds thereof, shall be distributed ratably among the holders of the Series B and any units ranking on a parity with the Series B in accordance with the amounts which would be payable on such distribution if the amount to which the holders of the Series B and any units ranking on a parity with the Series B are entitled were paid in full.

Voting

As provided in Company Operating Agreement, the holders of Series B shall not be entitled to vote on any matter submitted to a vote of the Members, and not be entitled to notice of any meeting of Members.

Redemption

If any outstanding Series B remain outstanding on the 14^th anniversary after issuance of the Series B, then the holders of a majority of the then outstanding Series B shall have the right to elect to have the Company redeem all outstanding Series B from funds legally available, at a price per unit equal to $1,000 plus an amount per unit equal to full cumulative dividends accrued and unpaid thereon to the redemption date.

Also the Series B may be redeemed from funds legally available, in whole or in part, at the election of the Company, expressed by resolution of the board of directors, at any time and from time to time at a price of $1,000 per unit plus any cumulative dividends accrued and unpaid.

12. Warrant

In connection with the Original Acquisition, the Company issued a warrant, which is recorded as additional paid in capital, to Hynix, which enables Hynix to purchase 5,079,254 common units of the Company. The value of each warrant to purchase one common unit is $0.414, which was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: fair value of $1.00 per unit; exercise price of $1.00 per unit; risk free rate of interest of 2.50%; volatility of 86%; dividend rate of 0%; and term of 2 years. This warrant expired unexercised in accordance with its terms on October 6, 2006.

13. Equity Incentive Plans

The Company adopted two equity incentive plans effective October 6, 2004 and March 21, 2005, respectively, which are administered by the Compensation Committee designated by the board of directors. Employees, consultants and non-employee directors are eligible for the grant of options to purchase the Company’s common units or restricted common units subject to terms and conditions determined by the Committee. The term of options in no event exceed ten years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2006, an aggregate maximum of 7,890,864 common units were authorized and reserved for all future and outstanding grants of options.

Unit options are generally granted with exercise prices of no less than the fair market value of the Company’s common units on the grant date. Generally, options vest and become exercisable in periodic installments, with 25% of the options vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and 6.25% of options vesting on the last day of each calendar quarter thereafter. In most cases, the requisite service period, or the period during which a grantee is required to provide service in exchange for option grants, coincides with the vesting period.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

Restricted units are issued upon the exercise of certain options to purchase restricted common units. Restricted units issued are subject to restrictions which generally lapse in installments over a four-year period.

The following summarizes unit option and restricted unit activities for the year ended December 31, 2006. At the date of grant, all options had an exercise price at or above the fair value of common units:


	Number of restricted stock	Number of options	Weighted average exercise price (in US dollars)	Weighted average remaining contractual life
Outstanding at January 1, 2006	1,726,062	3,780,643	1.6
Granted	—	2,107,500	1.6
Exercised	—	46,063	1.9
Forfeited / Repurchased	409,348	772,552	1.5
Released from restriction	517,936	—	n/a

Outstanding at December 31, 2006	798,778	5,069,528	1.6	8.6 years

Exercisable at December 31, 2006	N/A	1,588,000	1.6	7.9 years

Total unit option related compensation expense pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $243 thousand. As of December 31, 2006, there was $358 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average future period of 1.2 years. Total fair value of options vested for the year ended December 31, 2006 is $167 thousand.

The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to measure the fair value of each option grant. The following summarizes the grant-date fair value of options granted during the specified periods and assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on a weighted average basis:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Grant-date fair value of option (in US dollars)	$	0.22		$	0.22		$	0.38		$	0.38
Expected term		2.3Years			2.1Years			2.2 Years			3.5Years
Risk-free interest rate		4.9	%		3.3	%		2.6	%		3.75	%
Expected volatility		46.7	%		57.8	%		64.8	%		144.5	%
Expected dividends		—			—			—			—

The total cash received from employees as a result of option exercises was $88 thousand, $112 thousand and $2,456 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three months ended December 31, 2004, respectively. None of the options exercised during these periods had any intrinsic value.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

The following presents pro forma net loss and per unit data as if the fair value based method had been applied to account for the unit-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2005, three months ended December 31, 2004 and nine months ended September 30, 2004:


	Year ended December 31, 2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)						(Predecessor Company)
Net income (loss), as reported	$	(100,898	)	$	(5,825	)	$	43,237
Dividends accrued on preferred units		9,928			13,428

Net income (loss) attributable to common units (owner)		(110,826	)		(19,253	)		43,237
Add: unit(stock)-based compensation expense included in reported net income (loss), net of tax		—			—			3,324
Deduct: unit(stock)-based compensation expense determined under the fair value method, net of tax		(411	)		(995	)		(5,614	)

Pro forma net income (loss)	$	(111,237	)	$	(20,248	)	$	40,947

As reported loss per unit	$	(2.10	)	$	(0.38	)
Pro forma loss per unit	$	(2.10	)	$	(0.40	)

The pro forma presentation for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is based on stock options granted by Hynix before the Original Acquisition. However, none of these options were transferred as part of the Original Acquisition.

14. Restructuring and Impairment Charges

2006 Restructuring and Impairment Charges

During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded restructuring and impairment charges totaling $94,266 thousand, which included $92,858 thousand of impairment charges under SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived assets and $1,408 thousand of restructuring charges under SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.

The impairment charges of $92,540 thousand recorded during 2006 related to certain fixed assets and technology and customer-based intangible assets (the “asset group”) comprising our Imaging Solution business. At the end of fiscal year 2005, the capacity utilization of the Fab was under the level that we believe to be normal. This was primarily due to a transition in product mix coupled with a seasonal decrease in market demand, which was deemed to be temporary and recoverable. However, in 2006, our management determined, based on revised forecasting, that the projected demand for certain of its products was significantly less than previously forecasted and that this decline was not temporary or seasonal. Therefore, we assessed whether there had been a material impairment on the asset group pursuant to SFAS 144 and, based on the assessment, recorded impairment charges.

The impairment charge was measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset group over its fair value. The fair value of the asset group was estimated using a present value technique, where expected future cash flows from the use and eventual disposal of the asset group were discounted by an interest rate commensurate with the risk of the cash flows. The net book value of the asset group before the impairment charges was approximately $185,985 thousand.

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

In addition, the Company recorded impairment charges in the amount of $318 thousand related to the disposition of certain assets previously designated as assets held-for-sale and $1,408 thousand of restructuring charges in connection with the termination of certain of our management and employees.

2005 Restructuring and Impairment Charges

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded $36,234 thousand of restructuring and impairment charges which included $33,576 thousand of asset impairments and $2,658 thousand of restructuring.

In an effort to focus on its major business segments - Display Solutions, Imaging Solutions and Semiconductor Manufacturing Services, the Company made a strategic decision to divest its Application Processor business. Based on such decision, the Company recognized impairment charges on certain tangible and intangible assets related to the divesture. The impairment charge was measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset group over the fair value measured at the selling price of the assets.

In addition, the Company took a total of $2,658 thousand of restructuring charges which included early retirement costs and other related costs associated with the sale of Application Processor business.

15. Income Tax Expenses

The Company’s income tax expenses are composed of domestic and foreign income taxes depending on the relevant tax jurisdiction. For the Predecessor Company “Domestic” refers to the income before taxes, current income taxes and deferred income taxes generated or incurred in Korea. For the Successor Company, however, it refers to the income before taxes, current income taxes and deferred income taxes generated or incurred in the US, in which the ultimate parent of the Company resides.

The components of income tax expense are as follows:


	Year ended December 31						Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006			2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)									(Predecessor Company)
Income before income taxes
Domestic	$	5,862		$	(3,528	)	$	3,136		$	48,660
Foreign		(225,914	)		(95,554	)		(2,236	)		(2,595	)

	$	(220,052	)	$	(99,082	)	$	900		$	46,065

Current income taxes expense (benefits)
Domestic	$	(17	)	$	(9	)	$	266		$	—
Foreign		7,226			14,041			6,459			2,828

		7,209			14,032			6,725			2,828

Deferred income taxes expense (benefits)
Domestic		—			—			—			—
Foreign		2,049			(12,216	)		—			—

		2,049			(12,216	)		—			—

Total income tax expenses	$	9,258		$	1,816		$	6,725		$	2,828

MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Tabular dollars in thousands, except unit data)

The ultimate parent of the Company is a limited liability company, a non-taxable entity for US tax purposes and thus the statutory income tax rate shall be zero. A substantial portion of the income tax expenses above is incurred from MagnaChip Korea, which is the principal operating entity within the Company. The statutory income tax rate of MagnaChip Korea, including tax surcharges, applicable to the Company was approximately 27.5% in 2006 and 2005, which was reduced from 29.7% in 2004 in accordance with the Corporate Income Tax Law as amended on December 31, 2003. MagnaChip Korea is eligible for a tax exemption in which its corporate income tax is reduced by 50% from 2004 to 2006 and 30% from 2007 to 2008.

The income tax rate used to calculate the tax provision by the Predecessor Company was the statutory income tax rate of Korea, which was 29.7%. For the Successor Company, the statutory income tax rate is zero as its ultimate parent is a non-taxable US entity. The provision for domestic and foreign income taxes incurred is different from the amount calculated by applying the statutory tax rate to the net income before income taxes. The significant items causing this difference are as follows:


	Year ended December 31					Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	2006		2005			Three months ended December 31, 2004			Nine months ended September 30, 2004
	(Successor Company)								(Predecessor Company)
Provision computed at statutory rate	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	13,682
Permanent differences		1,850		(521	)		(161	)		532
Change in statutory tax rate		13,035		1,256			5,125			(818